Hey there!
Is it safe to give users access to /admin/luke ? I restricted access for normal
users and I also restrict acces per solr document(via a plugin). But for some
reasonse users need informations from /admin/luke.
Can they destroy something or retrieve informations that they shouldn't
Hi Erik,
Thanks for the reply.
Currently using solr cloud 6.1.0 and below is the solr admin UI which shows
that routing changes after make upconfig command
Below values shown in Solr Admin UI are before make re-upconfig where all
data are indexed into particular shard.
Solr gets the query on some node. It then sends sub-requests out to
one replica for each shard, perhaps on other nodes. You'd have to
insure that the parameters get added before the subrequests are made.
In the logs you'll see things like DISTRIB=false for sub-requests, so
the first thing to check
On 12/13/2017 3:16 PM, Sundaram, Dinesh wrote:
> Thanks Shawn for your input, Is this errors specific only for zookeeper
> operations? If so is there any way to turn off default zookeeper which runs
> on 9983?
If you don't want to start the embedded zookeeper, then you want to be
sure that you
Thanks Shawn for your input, Is this errors specific only for zookeeper
operations? If so is there any way to turn off default zookeeper which runs on
9983?
Dinesh Sundaram
MBS Platform Engineering
Mastercard
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Heisey [mailto:apa...@elyograg.org]
Sent:
Yes, in general these sorts of tools are not open source. Splainer is the
only one listed above that is open source.
Querqy is one potential open source solution:
https://github.com/renekrie/querqy
Best!
-Doug
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 4:16 PM David Hastings wrote:
>
lucidworks fusion is not open source
David J. Hastings | Lead Developer
dhasti...@wshein.com | 716.882.2600 x 176
William S. Hein & Co., Inc.
2350 North Forest Road | Getzville, NY 14068
www.wshein.com/contact-us
From: Doug Turnbull
I would also add Lucidworks Fusion to the list. Its a more powerful /
feature-rich end-to-end solution built on top of Solr. It has various tools
friendly for business users, but comes with lots of other functionality you
may or may not find useful.
Best
-Doug
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 3:44 PM
There's a lot of tools out there that target different audiences
Splainer - Open source, dev focused, but helps business users understand
results
http://splainer.io
Quepid - Product (our company's product), relevance tool for keeping
business owners and developer in sync on relevance tuning
Hello Folks,
Currently, we are running FAST ESP as a Search System & are looking to migrate
from FAST ESP to SOLR.
I was just wondering if you Guys have any built-in Relevancy tool for the
Business Folks like what we have in FAST called SBC (Search Business Center)?
Thanks, Abhi
The PayloadScoreQuery always returns a score of zero, regardless of
payloads. The PayloadCheckQParser works fine, so I know that I am
successfully indexing the payloads. Details below
*payload field that I am searching on:*
*definition of payload field type:*
I am trying to work out how to share a parameter value in all the Solr nodes in
a cluster.
I have two custom search components. One is defined in the first-components
list and the other is defined in the last-components list. Ideally, the
first-component creates the parameter value and sets
On 12/13/2017 10:06 AM, Sundaram, Dinesh wrote:
Thanks Shawn, this helps. Now getting the below exception, is there any way to
avoid verifying this?
2017-12-13 17:00:39.239 DEBUG
(httpShardExecutor-4-thread-1-processing-n:xx.xx.xx.xx:8983_solr
[https:xx.xx.xx.xx:8983//solr]
Thanks Shawn, this helps. Now getting the below exception, is there any way to
avoid verifying this?
2017-12-13 17:00:39.239 DEBUG
(httpShardExecutor-4-thread-1-processing-n:xx.xx.xx.xx:8983_solr
[https:xx.xx.xx.xx:8983//solr] https:xx.xx.xx.xx:8983//solr) [ ]
Hi Erick,
I think it's json input I'm after. Here, some background might help, and
sorry for being unclear in my query. To date my index is made up of
about 2 dozen entities, collected with a pull from a remote mysql db.
This db is the persistence layer of a CMS we use. One of our departments
has
Glad that worked. No, there's no way to hard-code as the old solr.xml,
that's pretty antithetical to SolrCloud.
IIRC, though, you're making it too complicated ;)
Machine N goes down that hosts collection_shard1_replica32
Bring machine N+1 up with Solr
Collections API:
ADDREPLCIA with the
Then you'll have to re-index probably after you set up your new collections.
If you have stored _all_ your original fields you could query from
your 4x and index to your SolrCloud, but it'd be best if you could
just reindex from the original source.
Best,
Erick
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 10:02 PM,
No images come through in e-mail so I can't see what you're actually doing.
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 3:06 AM, Nimesh Aghera wrote:
>
>
> Hi Erik,
>
>
>
> Thanks for the reply.
>
>
>
> Currently using solr cloud 6.1.0 and below is the solr admin UI which
> shows that routing
You can do this with DIH, but that has some problems. I'd strongly
recommend you think about using Tika in an independent client code.
Here's a program that gets you started:
https://lucidworks.com/2012/02/14/indexing-with-solrj/
Best,
Erick
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 5:36 AM, Sean Gilhuly
So you need to index json docs? Or you want to process json input and
get it to Solr via SolrJ? Or???
https://lucidworks.com/2012/02/14/indexing-with-solrj/
will give you a skeleton how to connect to Solr and index Solr docs.
You'd have to parse the json and construct the SolrInputDocument and
From what I remember, you can set a custom permission for a specific user to be
able to delete a collection, or not allow anyone to delete a specific
collection.
Check out the “user defined permissions” section here:
https://lucidworks.com/2015/08/17/securing-solr-basic-auth-permission-rules/
Is there a bug with solr.SuggestComponent, Solr 6.30, and the delimiter
between multiple words in term?
If there are multiple words in the term suggested, the words are delimited
with an information separator, U+001E.
https://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/001e/index.htm
In Chrome Version
That is an old recommendation. Since Solr 5, Solr is no longer a war and
Tomcat is not supported. With modern Solr, you have only the one choice of
going to production with Jetty and there are hundreds (thousands maybe?) of
Solr implementations that do so. Jetty is now considered an
I have an existing solr installation which uses the mysql jdbc driver to
access a remote database and index some complex data structures. This
has been serving me very well for a good long time, but I now need to
expand it a bit. I need to add some additional data from another source
via json, and
Hi All,
Last day I was able to configure Solr Suggester for recommendation in my
site with the following settings
mySuggester
AnalyzingLookupFactory
DocumentDictionaryFactory
query_suggest
On 12/12/2017 1:23 PM, Anshum Gupta wrote:
> You might want to explore Rule based authorization in Solr and stop
> non-admin users from deleting collections etc. Here’s the link to the
> documentation:
> https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/rule-based-authorization-plugin.html
Because I've
We are setting up solrcloud 6.6 in production. In some blogs, I see that Jetty
is not recommended in prod environment. Is that the case ? Any specific
disadvantages of going with Jetty ?
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
Is there a bug with solr.SuggestComponent, Solr 6.30, and the delimiter
between multiple words in term?
If there are multiple words in the term suggested, the words are delimited
with an information separator, U+001E.
https://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/001e/index.htm
In Chrome Version
Is there a bug with solr.SuggestComponent, Solr 6.30, and the delimiter
between multiple words in term?
If there are multiple words in the term suggested, the words are delimited
with an information separator, U+001E.
https://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/001e/index.htm
In Chrome Version
Hello,
I have been successfully able to index archive files (zip, tar, and the
like) using solr cell, but the archive is returned as a single document
when I do queries. Is there a way to configure it so that files are
extracted recursively, and indexed separately?
I know that if I set the
Yes . It is working for me .
Thanks Emir & Mikhali :)
Just a last question . Will it hurt any other document index while indexing
partially with _version_ field or any other fallback if i am regularly
sending _version_:1 for each partial document update .
Example -
Hi Erik,
Thanks for the reply.
Currently using solr cloud 6.1.0 and below is the solr admin UI which shows
that routing changes after make upconfig command
Below image are before make re-upconfig where all data are indexed into
particular shard.
AMS_Config:
That can work, but the goal it’s to avoid human error (like the UI that enforce
you to type de name of the collection on delete) independently of the access
level.
Regards
--
/Yago Riveiro
On 12 Dec 2017 20:24 +, Anshum Gupta , wrote:
> You might want to explore Rule
Hi,
Did you try with _version_=1
“If the content in the _version_ field is equal to '1', then the document must
simply exist. In this case, no version matching occurs, but if the document
does not exist, the updates will be rejected.”
Regards,
Emir
--
Monitoring - Log Management - Alerting -
Hi Mikhali
Thanks for this knowledge .
But i want to prevent partial update in case of document not exists . I do
not want to call rest solr api to check existence of document before
updating document partially .
Is there not any configuration in solr to prevent creating new document in
case
35 matches
Mail list logo