On 10/10/2018 11:33 PM, Sourav Moitra wrote:
Hello Shawn,
Thanks for quick reply.
Where precisely are you seeing the 98% usage?
On the Solr web UI. Although the same Solr UI is reporting heap usage
to be below 1 GB.
Also I found that Solr Java is holding(VIRT) 8GB of total memory even
with
Hello Shawn,
Thanks for quick reply.
> > Where precisely are you seeing the 98% usage?
On the Solr web UI. Although the same Solr UI is reporting heap usage
to be below 1 GB.
Also I found that Solr Java is holding(VIRT) 8GB of total memory even
with Xmx set to 2g using top command.
Can it be due
On 10/10/2018 10:08 PM, Sourav Moitra wrote:
We have a Solr server with 8gb of memory. We are using solr in cloud
mode, solr version is 7.5, Java version is Oracle Java 9 and settings
for Xmx and Xms value is 2g but we are observing that the RAM getting
used to 98% when doing indexing.
How can
Hello,
We have a Solr server with 8gb of memory. We are using solr in cloud
mode, solr version is 7.5, Java version is Oracle Java 9 and settings
for Xmx and Xms value is 2g but we are observing that the RAM getting
used to 98% when doing indexing.
How can I ensure that SolrCloud doesn't use
Thanks for confirm. Indeed, we are planning on adding log monitoring as
well to work around this issue.
It seems to me that if SOLR is unable to recognize an irreparable failure,
then that is a bug. I filed this bug to track.
1.SOLR-12850
Hi Piyush,
I suppose your end goal is to search special chars too and I hope you are
using it typeahead.
Keyword tokenizer keep the complete string as token. So when you search
with partial it won't match.
You could add the n-gram filter. Then output of keyword tokenizer will be
broken in
Best Option - Put a load balancer/distributor in front of it.
Other Option - Edit jetty.xml.Solr uses Jetty, and so the key is in the
HTTPConfiguration for jetty.
This file, in my installation is in solr-X.Y.Z/etc/jetty.xml
There is some documentation at
How to restrict solr 7.4 to use TLS 1.2 only?
Keith
Anyone have any insight here?
On 10/8/18, 3:34 PM, "David Santamauro" wrote:
Hi, quick question. Should
1) {!complexphrase inOrder=false}f: ( "cat jump"~2 )
... and
2) f: ( "cat jump"~2 )
... yield the same results? I'm trying to diagnose a more
I haven't found a way to reproduce the problem other that running our
entire set of code. I've also been trying different things to make sure to
problem is not from my end and so far I haven't managed to fix it by
changing my code. It has to be a race condition somewhere but I just can't
put my
Thank you, Shawn. I'm now using a custom HttpClient that I create in a
similar manner as SolrJ, and it works quite well.
Of course, a fix in a future release would be great, so that we can
remove the workaround eventually.
Thanks,
Andreas
Shawn Heisey schrieb am 10.10.2018 um 16:31:
On
Well assigning a bogus version that generates a 409 error then
immediately doing an RTG on the doc doesn't fail for me either 18
million tries later. So I'm afraid I haven't a clue where to go from
here. Unless we can somehow find a way to generate this failure I'm
going to drop it for the
On 10/1/2018 6:54 AM, Andreas Hubold wrote:
Is there some other way to configure an HTTP proxy, e.g. with
HttpSolrClient.Builder? I don't want to create an Apache HttpClient
instance myself but the builder from Solrj (HttpSolrClient.Builder).
Unless you want to wait for a fix for SOLR-12848,
I've now created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12848 for this
problem.
--
Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
Hi,
I am trying to read documents from a file system into Solr, using
dataimporthandler but keep getting the following errors:
[cid:image002.png@01D46082.022FF7A0]
Exception while processing: files document :
null:org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DataImportHandlerException:
15 matches
Mail list logo
