Usually for this situation, I will set an arbitrary date like '1900-01-01'.
Solr's date field won't be able to accept value like 'null' or '-00-00'.
Regards,
Edwin
On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 at 20:55, Jörn Franke wrote:
> Simply not insert it
>
> > Am 04.03.2019 um 09:30 schrieb Jasmin Mamtora :
>
Hi,
For your info, this issue is occurring in the new Solr 7.7.1 as well.
Regards,
Edwin
On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 at 10:28, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Anyone else has other suggestions or have faced the same problem?
>
> Regards,
> Edwin
>
> On Wed, 20 Feb 2019 at 16:58, Zheng Lin Edwin
Reinstall it. If the hardware is the same.
On Mon, 4 Mar 2019, 20:45 Gael Jourdan-Weil, <
gael.jourdan-w...@kelkoogroup.com> wrote:
> Hi Erick,
>
> We are running Solr 7.6.0.
> We recently upgraded from 7.2.1 but we already had theses issues with Solr
> 7.2.1.
>
> Is the overseer different from
Hi Erick,
We are running Solr 7.6.0.
We recently upgraded from 7.2.1 but we already had theses issues with Solr
7.2.1.
Is the overseer different from the leader?
In the Solr Admin UI > SolrCloud > Tree > overseer > leader file I can see the
machine being the leader is not the one having issues
What version of Solr? There are some anecdotal reports of abnormal CPU loads on
very recent Solr’s.
Is the server with the high load the “Overseer”? In the admin
UI>>SolrCloud>>tree you can see which node is the Overseer. This is really a
shot in the dark, as unless you are doing a lot of
First, if you _changed_ the analysis chain without re-indexing all documents,
that could account for it.
Second, the analysis page is a little tricky. It _assumes_ that the words you
put in the boxes have been parsed into the field you select. So let’s say you
have this field “title” that has
Dear Furkan,
I did. What i am not able to understand correctly at the moment, how to run
SOLR in parallel.
So, i figured out that we can run indexing with SolrJ with XML file.
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Index-database-with-SolrJ-using-xml-file-directly-throws-an-error-td4426491.html
There’s no restriction on the except in the sense that if you add a
document with the _same_ as a document already in the index, Solr
will delete the old document and add a new one. That would account for your
deleted documents.
> On Mar 4, 2019, at 8:31 AM, Juergen Melzer (DPDHL IT
No, we are using only
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrClient#addBeans(java.util.Collection)
and we have an autocommit used.
Gruß
Jürgen Melzer
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Walter Underwood [mailto:wun...@wunderwood.org]
Gesendet: Montag, 4. März 2019 17:29
An:
Do you update documents? That deletes the old and adds the new.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Mar 4, 2019, at 8:27 AM, Juergen Melzer (DPDHL IT Services)
> wrote:
>
> Hi all
>
> We have a strange situation. When we are creating
Hi all
We have a strange situation. When we are creating the index we see a lot of
documents that are marked as deleted. But we don't delete any document while we
are adding documents.
We are thinking about the uniquekey that might be that problem. Is there any
restriction regarding using a
Hello Furkan,
Yes the 3 servers have exact same configuration.
Varnish load balancing is effectively round robin.
We monitor the number of requests per second, and we effectively see the 3
servers are receiving same amount of requests.
Kind Regards,
Gaël
De :
Hi Gaël,
Does all three servers have same specifications? On the other hand, is your
load balancing configuration for Varnish is round-robin?
Kind Regards,
Furkan KAMACI
On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 3:18 PM Gael Jourdan-Weil <
gael.jourdan-w...@kelkoogroup.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I come again to
Hi Sami,
Did you check delta import documentation:
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler#Using_delta-import_command
Kind Regards,
Furkan KAMACI
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 7:24 PM sami wrote:
> Hi Shawan, can you please suggest a small program or atleast a backbone of
> a
> program which
Hi Fiz,
Could you elaborate your question?
Kind Regards,
Furkan KAMACI
On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 7:41 PM Fiz Ahmed wrote:
> Hi Solr Experts,
>
> Can you please suggest Code review techniques for SOLR related changes in a
> Project.
>
>
> Thanks
> FIZ
> AML Team.
>
Simply not insert it
> Am 04.03.2019 um 09:30 schrieb Jasmin Mamtora :
>
> Hi,
>
> I am using solr 7.5 version and i have a question related to the null value
> insert in solr or insert date with '-00-00'.
>
> Please suggest me , if we can do this.
>
> Thanks and Regards,
> Jasmin
Thanks James,
it works!
--
Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
Hi,
I am using solr 7.5 version and i have a question related to the null value
insert in solr or insert date with '-00-00'.
Please suggest me , if we can do this.
Thanks and Regards,
Jasmin Mamtora
Hello,
I come again to the community for some ideas regarding a performance issue we
are having.
We have a SolrCloud cluster of 3 servers.
Each server hosts 1 replica of 2 collections.
There is no sharding, every server hosts the whole collection.
Requests are evenly distributed by a Varnish
Greetings,
I have a couple of questions about Solr /Wordpress integration -
First , I am not "committed to using WordPress as a front end. If there is a
better front end option , I would be willing to convert. For functionality ,
all I am looking for is the ability to full txt search , highlight
Thank you for the answer and heading me to this solution. But I've already
used this filter for index analysis and I'm not getting any result. So I
don't understand why I'm not getting the result.
If I use the Analysis tool, I'm gettin
So, maybe the problem is other? But I don't see what can be
Good afternoon solr community. I'm having an issue debugging an edismax query
which appears to behave differently across two separate collections with what I
believe to be the same default query parameters. Each collection contains
different data but are configured using similar default query
Using QParser solved the problem.
Many thanks, best regards and a nice start in the week,
--
Moritz Schmidt
Am 01.03.19, 11:25 schrieb "Mikhail Khludnev" :
Just a guess
QueryParser might be a Lucene class, which isn;t aware of Solr scheme and
hence might not properly convert term
23 matches
Mail list logo
