The database has 120 entries and 2 (not 20 as mentioned
earlier) plus new records are added and around the same number deleted.
For Full Import it takes approximately 4 minutes to Index.
Regards,
Anuj
On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 at 07:29, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo
wrote:
> Have you tried how lo
You need to set the field which you want to highlight in the hl.fl
parameter in your solrconfig.xml.
Highlighting can work in String field.
Regards,
Edwin
On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 at 05:53, Kumaresh AK wrote:
> How would I go about change by field type to facilitate highlighting ? I
> tried hl on my
Have you tried how long does it take to index all the entries?
Regards,
Edwin
On Fri, 12 Apr 2019 at 12:32, Anuj Bhargava wrote:
> We have a MySql database (news) which has the following fields -
> posting_id, date, name, currency, country, expiry etc
>
> The database has more than 120
Thanks Saurabh And Prince, Works perfectly.
On Sun, 14 Apr 2019 at 17:21, Prince Manohar
wrote:
> Basically, you need to boost some documents low.
>
> For this, you can either use solr’s Boost Query ( bq ) or Boost Function
> (bf)
> parameter.
>
> For example in your case:-
>
> If you want the d
How would I go about change by field type to facilitate highlighting ? I
tried hl on my current schema and the highlight section is empty. I guess I
need to change to multivalue text. Currently it is String Field as these
are identifiers and no analysis needed on those
On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at
On 4/13/2019 12:58 PM, John Davis wrote:
We noticed a sizable performance degradation when we add certain fq filters
to the query even though the result set does not change between the two
queries. I would've expected solr to optimize internally by picking the
most constrained fq filter first, bu
On 4/13/2019 9:29 PM, vishal patel wrote:
2> In production, lots of documents come for indexing within a second.If i do
hard commit interval to 60 seconds then in less times open searchers when hard
commit execute. Is it ohk for performance?
The autoCommit configuration should have openSearch
Patches welcome, but how would that be done? There’s no fixed schema at the
Lucene level. It’s even possible that no two documents in the index have any
fields in common. Given the structure of an inverted index, answering the
question “for document X does it have any value?" is rather “interes
Hi Carsten,
I think this is probably worth a jira. I'm not familiar enough with
bin/post to say definitively whether the behavior you mention is a
bug, or whether it's "expected" in some odd sense. But there's enough
uncertainty that I think it's worth recording there.
Best,
Jason
On Fri, Apr
Btw, can it be done by highlighting?
On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 3:22 PM Kumaresh AK wrote:
> Hi Mikhail,
> Thanks for the response. I see the results have the details I am looking
> for. But it is not well structured. I sense that the debug=results is for
> understanding the scoring behind the resu
Hi Mikhail,
Thanks for the response. I see the results have the details I am looking
for. But it is not well structured. I sense that the debug=results is for
understanding the scoring behind the results which can be more than what I
am looking for. Is there any other way ? The multivalued field ma
Basically, you need to boost some documents low.
For this, you can either use solr’s Boost Query ( bq ) or Boost Function (bf)
parameter.
For example in your case:-
If you want the documents with countries A and B to show last in the
result, you can use:-
bq=( country:A OR country:B )^-1
Note
fq=country :c1 OR c2 OR c3&sort=if(termfreq (country,c2),0,1) desc
Correcting query.
On Sun 14 Apr, 2019, 3:36 PM Saurabh Sharma,
wrote:
> I would suggest to sort on the basis of condition. First find all the
> records and then sort on the basis of condition where you will be putting
> spcific
Hi,
we're at the process of testing Solr for its indexing speed which is very
impotent to our application.
we've witnessed strange behavior that we wish to understand before using it.
when we indexed 1M docs it took about 63 seconds but when we indexed the same
documents only now we've nested the
I would suggest to sort on the basis of condition. First find all the
records and then sort on the basis of condition where you will be putting
spcific countries below other.
fq=country :c1 OR c2 OR c3&sort=if(termfreq (country,c2),1,0) desc
Here we are putting c2 below c1 and c3.
You can also
Hi ZarskiJ
> 1) I have not tried post as we are using SolrJ version 6.4 - There is no
> option to change the method of the request as far as I know from looking at
> the documentation.
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/6_4_2/solr-solrj/org/apache/solr/client/solrj/SolrClient.html#query-org.apache.
I have a field *country*. I need to do a search in which I need to show the
search result of a country or some countries, last in the search result for
eg. country code *BD*. What query should I use to get the above result.
fq=country:???&q=*%3A*
Hello, Kumaresh!
If you turn it to q you may try debug=results&debug.explain.structured=true
with some performance impact.
On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 2:41 AM Kumaresh AK wrote:
> Hello!
> I am new to SOLR. This is my field type definition:
>
> > > stored="true" multiValued="true" omitTermFreqAndP
18 matches
Mail list logo
