Hi all,
I use solr-7.3.1 release,when split a shard1 to shard1_0_1,
encountered OOM error,then shard1_0_1 publish a status as
recovery_failed.
How to deal with a shard in recovery_failed status?
Remove shard1_0_1 and then do split shard1 again?
Or any other way to retry?
Best wishes,
> On Jun 17, 2019, at 1:17 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
>
>> Ideally I’d like Solr/Jetty to be able to white-list any connection from a
>> root-owned socket.
>
> Solr typically runs as a non-privileged user. If the start script detects
> that it's running as root, it will refuse to start
Solr requires a very precise format, the one you’re sending has both
too many zeros to the right of the decimal point and is missing the
terminating ‘Z’. See:
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/working-with-dates.html
The output you’re getting is from Tika, which is used by Solr.
You’ll
Bram:
Here’s a fuller explanation that you might be interested in:
https://lucidworks.com/2011/12/28/why-not-and-or-and-not/
Best,
Erick
> On Jun 17, 2019, at 11:32 AM, Bram Biesbrouck
> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 7:11 PM Shawn Heisey wrote:
>
>> On 6/17/2019 4:46 AM, Bram
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 7:11 PM Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 6/17/2019 4:46 AM, Bram Biesbrouck wrote:
> > q={!parent which=-(parentUri:*)}*:*
>
> Pure negative queries do not work in Lucene. Sometimes, when you do a
> single-clause negative query, Solr is able to detect the problem and
>
Hello,
I install solr 8.1.1 and when I trying indexing libreoffice files (ods,
odt,...) throws:
org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: ERROR:
[doc=D42039220124097949-A100020965] Error adding field
'last_modified'='2019-06-14T16:59:47.61000' msg=Invalid Date
On 6/16/2019 10:43 PM, Felipe Gasper wrote:
Does Solr do its own authentication, or does Jetty do that? One of the benefits
of UNIX sockets is that the socket exposes the peer’s credentials, so
Solr/Jetty could implement logic that says, “ah, you’re root? Cool, you’re in.”
As far as I know,
On 6/17/2019 4:46 AM, Bram Biesbrouck wrote:
q={!parent which=-(parentUri:*)}*:*
Pure negative queries do not work in Lucene. Sometimes, when you do a
single-clause negative query, Solr is able to detect the problem and
automatically make an adjustment so the query works. This happens
Hello! We (Etsy) would like to optimize primary key lookup speed. Our
primary key is a 32-bit integer -- and are wondering what the
state-of-the-art is for FieldType and Codec these days for maximizing the
throughput of 32-bit ID lookups.
Context:
Specifically, we're looking to optimize the
Hi,
Has any one tried with the following project to index MongoDB via DIH?
I tried to use it. But could not add a filter in the find() method.
Any suggestions? Thanks!
https://github.com/james75/SolrMongoImporter
--
Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
Hi all,
https://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/FTS/Solr
^^ I’m looking at this documentation and am wondering if its discussion
of the managed-schema and schema.xml files is inaccurate/incomplete/misleading.
Dovecot’s documentation implies that it’s normal operation for the
There are a number of possibilities, but what this really sounds
like is that you aren’t committing your documents. There’s more
than you want to know here:
https://lucidworks.com/2013/08/23/understanding-transaction-logs-softcommit-and-commit-in-sorlcloud/
But here’s the short form: In the
yes, this is the way to do it
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 6:54 AM Jan Høydahl wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Have you tried adding all your commands to the same file?
>
> {
> "add-requesthandler":{"name":"/foo","class":"solr.SearchHandler"},
>
Dear all,
I'm new to this list, so let me introduce myself. I'm Bram, author of a
linked data framework called Stralo. We're working toward version 1.0, in
which we're integrating Solr indexing and querying of RDF triples (
I am newbie to Apache Manifold (ver – 2.12) and Solr(ver – 7.6) with
Zookeeper (ver 3.14). I have created three collections in Solr out of which
data for two comes from Manifold while one has from manual data insert
through simple solr API. When I run jobs in Manifold I can see data is
getting
Hi Edwin,
Yes the field is defined just like the other fields:
BR
Martin
Internal - KMD A/S
-Original Message-
From: Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo
Sent: 4. juni 2019 10:32
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: highlighting not working as expected
Hi Martin,
What fieldType are you
Hi Jörn,
Thanks for your input!
I do not use stop-words, so that should not be the issue. The encoding of the
documents might be an issue, as they come in many different file formats. It
will however need to test this.
The field is defined as below:
BR
Martin
Internal - KMD A/S
17 matches
Mail list logo