I had to add an additional repository to get the failing dependency to
resolve:
resolvers += "Spring Plugins Repository" at "
https://repo.spring.io/plugins-release/;
> However, we do not officially support Maven builds,
Um, why? This is a java based project, and maven is the de-facto standard
It seems that the issue is not with reference_url field itself. There is
one copy field which has the reference_url field as source and another
field called url_path as destination.
This destination field url_path has the following field type definition.
This is true _unless_ you fetch from docValues. docValues are SORTED_SETs,
so the results will be both ordered and deduplicated if you return them
as part of the field list.
Don’t really think it needs to go into the ref guide, it’s just inherent in
storing
any kind of value. You wouldn’t expect
Thanks, and genuinely asking: is there written somewhere in the
documentation too? If no, could anyone suggest to me which doc page should
I try to update?
On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 8:08 PM Colvin Cowie
wrote:
> The order of values within a multivalued field should match the insertion
> order. --
The order of values within a multivalued field should match the insertion
order. -- we certainly rely on that in our product.
Order is guaranteed to be maintained for values in a multi-valued field.
>
Hi all,
simple question: Solr float/double multivalue fields preserve the order of
inserted values?
Best regards,
Vincenzo
--
Vincenzo D'Amore
First, remove the “mm” parameter from the request handler definition. That can
be added back in and tweaked later, or just left out.
Second, you don’t need any query syntax to search for two words. This query
should work fine:
books bags
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
I think it's better to think of Solr as a piece of infrastructure or
component for you to build these things, rather than a product that has a
lot of capabilities for some specific use case.
So you can find 'lego pieces' to build some of these things, but with Solr
you need to build these things
Thanks for Jan's response.
I tried to set this "nodes" parameter by ModifiableSolrParams. But the null
is return from GenericSolrRequest.
Could anyone advise the best approach to setup this parameter for multiple
nodes?
Thanks,
Chien
--
Sent from:
Does it fail similarly on 8.5.0 and .1?
On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 6:38 AM Erick Erickson
wrote:
> There have been some issues with Maven, see:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9170
>
> However, we do not officially support Maven builds, they’re there as a
> convenience, so there may
Please let s know what version of Solr you use, otherwise it’s very hard to know
whether you’re running into https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8812
or similar.
But two things to try:
1> specify q.op
lr
2> specify mm=0%
Best,
Erick
> On Jul 2, 2020, at 1:22 AM, Tushar Arora wrote:
>
>
There have been some issues with Maven, see:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9170
However, we do not officially support Maven builds, they’re there as a
convenience, so there may still
be issues in future.
> On Jul 2, 2020, at 1:27 AM, Ali Akhtar wrote:
>
> If I try adding
Hi,
We are performing QA performance testing on couple of collections which holds 2
billion and 3.5 billion docs respectively. Indexing happens from a separate
client using solrJ which uses 10 thread and batch size 1000. From last 2-3
weeks we have been noticing either slow indexing or timeout
Thanks a lot for your time to respond for my clarifications.
We are having two environment,
ENV A and ENV B ( Both same capacity of RAM ( r5.2xlarge and same number of
shards and replicas type (NRT) for the collection)
ENV A - it is having a collection which is optimized ( segment count 1 and
Hi,
I have setup Solr 8.5 version and now facing problem with CPU utilization shown
at Dashboard.
It always says 0%, even though there are processes running on the node, like
"ab" for load testing and data import.
I need help to fix this. Please help if someone has seen this issue.
15 matches
Mail list logo