the first result is
high and then each additional document is a minimal increment in time.
Do a query with rows=1 (or even 0) and see what the minimum query time is
for your query, index, and environment.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Aleksey Vorona
Sent: Wednesday, November 21
Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm
On Nov 21, 2012 6:04 PM, Aleksey Vorona avor...@ea.com wrote:
In all of my queries I have timeAllowed parameter. My application is ready
for partial results. However, whenever Solr returns partial result it is a
very bad result.
For example, I have a test query
In all of my queries I have timeAllowed parameter. My application is
ready for partial results. However, whenever Solr returns partial result
it is a very bad result.
For example, I have a test query and here its execution log with the
strict time allowed:
WARNING: Query: omitted; Elapsed
Hi,
Our application sometimes generates queries with one of the constraints:
field:[* TO *]
I expected this query performance to be the same as if we omitted the
field constraint completely. However, I see the performance of the two
queries to differ drastically (3ms without all-wildcard
Thank both of you for the responses!
-- Aleksey
On 12-09-27 03:51 AM, Erick Erickson wrote:
I'll echo Otis, nothing comes to mind...
Unless you were indexing stuff to the _slaves_, which you should
never do, now or in the past
Erick
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 12:00 AM, Aleksey Vorona avor
Hi,
I remember having some issues with replication and autocommit
previously. But now we are using Solr 3.6.1. Are there any known issues
or any other reasons to avoid autocommit while using replication? I
guess not, just want confirmation from someone confident and competent.
-- Aleksey
Hi,
I have a field with space in its name (that is a dynamic field). How can
I execute search on it?
I tried q=aattr_box%20%type_sc:super and it did not work
The field name is aattr_box type
-- Aleksey
On 12-09-19 11:04 AM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
I have a field with space in its name (that is a dynamic
field). How can I execute search on it?
I tried q=aattr_box%20%type_sc:super and it did not work
The field name is aattr_box type
How about q=aattr_box\ type_sc:super
That works! Thank you!
to, but I predict you'll regret if if you don't G.
Best
Erick
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Aleksey Vorona avor...@ea.com wrote:
On 12-09-19 11:04 AM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
I have a field with space in its name (that is a dynamic
field). How can I execute search on it?
I tried q=aattr_box%20
Thank you. I did the test with curl the same way you did it and it works.
I still can not get ab (apache benchmark) to reuse connections to
solr. I'll investigate this further.
$ ab -c 1 -n 100 -k 'http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q=*:*' | grep Alive
Keep-Alive requests:0
-- Aleksey
On
Hi,
Running example Solr from the 3.6.1 distribution I can not make it to
keep persistent HTTP connections:
$ ab -c 1 -n 100 -k 'http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q=*:*' | grep
Keep-Alive
Keep-Alive requests:0
What should I change to fix that?
P.S. We have the same issue in production
. Assume close to signal end
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
response
...removed the rest of the response body...
-- Aleksey
On 12-09-05 03:54 PM, Aleksey Vorona wrote:
Hi,
Running example Solr from the 3.6.1 distribution I can not make it to
keep persistent HTTP connections:
$ ab -c 1 -n 100
of the
tuning knobs before jumping to a solution. Also be aware that
the first time, for instance, a sort gets performed there's a lengthy
hit for warming the caches so you should disregard the first few
queries, or do appropriate autowarming.
Best
Erick
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Aleksey Vorona
of the previous binaries.
-- Aleksey
On 12-08-29 06:17 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
Not much information to go on here, have you tried the DIH
debugging console? See:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler#interactive
Best
Erick
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Aleksey Vorona avor...@ea.com
Hi, we are running Solr 3.6.1 and see an issue in our load tests. Some
of the queries our load test script produces result in huge number of
hits. It may go as high as 90% of all documents we have (2.5M). Those
are all range queries. I see in the log that those queries take much
more time to
On 12-08-29 11:44 AM, dhaivat dave wrote:
Hello everyone .
Can any one know any component or tool that can be used for testing the
solr performance.
People were recommending https://code.google.com/p/solrmeter/ earlier.
-- Aleksey
We have Solr 3.6.1 running on Jetty (7.x) and using DIH to get data from
the MySQL database. On one of the environment the import always fails
with an exception: http://pastebin.com/tG28cHPe
It is a null pointer exception on connection being null. I've tested
that I can connect from the Solr
17 matches
Mail list logo
