Frange Alternative in the filter query

. Regards, Aman Deep Singh

Re: Difference in queryString and Parsed query

Hi Lavanya, This is probably due to the kstem Filter factory it is removing the y charactor ,since the stemmer has rule of words ending with y . Regards, Aman Deep Singh > On 21-Jan-2019, at 5:43 PM, Mikhail Khludnev wrote: > > querystring is what goes into QPaser, pa

Solr Expand throws NPE along with elevate component

or all the queries. Regards, Aman Deep Singh

Solr scale function scale single doc to min value

with same value Solr version = 6.6.0 Scale function = scale(query({!type=edismax v=$q}),0,100) Regards Aman deep singh

Re: Solr mm is field Level in case sow is false

) 4. Ngrams field (model related field, partial word matches) > On 29-Nov-2017, at 8:30 AM, Steve Rowe <sar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Aman, see my responses inline below. > >> On Nov 28, 2017, at 9:11 PM, Aman Deep Singh <amandeep.coo...@gmail.com> >>

Re: Solr mm is field Level in case sow is false

Thanks steve, I got it but my problem is u can't make the every field with same analysis, Is there any chance that sow and mm will work properly ,I don't see this in future pipe line also,as their is no jira related to this. Thanks , Aman deep singh On 28-Nov-2017 8:02 PM, "Steve Rowe&

Solr mm is field Level in case sow is false

and any way to fix so that mm will work across fields in qf. Thanks, Aman Deep Singh

Re: mm is not working if you have same term multiple times in query

lock1 bar1 lock2, but that would mess score… Maybe there is something specific about your usecase that could be used to make it work. Emir > On 22 Sep 2017, at 15:17, Aman Deep Singh <amandeep.coo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Emir, > Thanks for the reply, > I understand how the

Re: mm is not working if you have same term multiple times in query

)dynamically ,will definitely try to use the function query. Thanks, Aman Deep Singh On 22-Sep-2017 6:25 PM, "Emir Arnautović" <emir.arnauto...@sematext.com> wrote: > Hi Aman, > You have wrong expectations: Edismax does respect mm, it’s just that it is > met. If you take a lo

mm is not working if you have same term multiple times in query

doc 1 in resultset as i don't want user to get the Doc1. Schema < tokenizer class="solr.StandardTokenizerFactory"/> Their is no synonym is added also. Thanks, Aman Deep Singh

Re: Case sensitive synonym value

Hi all, Any update on this issue. -Aman On 10-Aug-2017 8:27 AM, "Aman Deep Singh" <amandeep.coo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, > Ignore case is set to true and it is working fine > > > On 10-Aug-2017 12:43 AM, "Erick Erickson" <erickerick...@gmail.com&

Re: Arabic words search in solr

Try the edge ngram filter https://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#solr.EdgeNGramFilterFactory I think it will help you solve the problem On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 7:08 PM mohanmca01 <mohanmc...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Aman Deep Singh, > > Thanks for your update..

RE: Arabic words search in solr

You can configure mm either in the request handler sorconfig.xml or pass as a request parameter along side the user query For more detail refer https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/The+DisMax+Query+Parser example of sample handler is 10 searchFields 100% dismax

Re: Case sensitive synonym value

Yes, Ignore case is set to true and it is working fine On 10-Aug-2017 12:43 AM, "Erick Erickson" <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote: You set ignoreCase="true" though, right? On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 8:39 AM, Aman Deep Singh <amandeep.coo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi

Re: Case sensitive synonym value

atch PRF applewatch iwatch WDF applewatch iwatch LCF applewatch iwatch Thanks, Aman Deep Singh On 09-Aug-2017 8:46 PM, "Erick Erickson" <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote: > Admin/analysis is a good place to start figuring this out. For > instance, do you have lowerCaseFilter config

Case sensitive synonym value

ace the token with *applewatch and iwatch* (in lowercase),which i didn't want I need the synonyms to comes with the same case what i have configured i.e. *appleWatch and iWatch* Any idea on how to so that . Thanks, Aman Deep Singh

RE: Arabic words search in solr

Use mm=100% in the request handler It will give the same AND functionality On 06-Aug-2017 11:59 AM, "mohanmca01" wrote: hello Allison. thank you for the information. i referred to your slide "33", yes we are looking for same kind of results and solution. would you

Re: Facet is not working while querying with group

ically accumulate values in > them. You should set stored="false" for all destinations of copyField > directives. > > Best, > Erick > > On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 9:23 AM, Aman Deep Singh > <amandeep.coo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > No Shawn, > > I downlo

Re: Facet is not working while querying with group

Heisey <apa...@elyograg.org> wrote: > On 6/20/2017 11:01 PM, Aman Deep Singh wrote: > > If I am using docValues=false getting this exception > > java.lang.IllegalStateException: Type mismatch: isBlibliShipping was > > indexed with multiple values per docum

Re: Facet is not working while querying with group

6/20/2017 12:07 AM, Aman Deep Singh wrote: > > Again the same problem started to occur and I haven't change any schema > > It's only coming to the Numeric data types only (tint,tdouble) and that > too > > in group query only > > If I search with string field type it wo

Re: Could not load collection from ZK:

PM Shawn Heisey <apa...@elyograg.org> wrote: > On 6/20/2017 8:25 AM, Aman Deep Singh wrote: > > This error is coming in the application which is using solrj to > communicate > > to the solr > > full stacktrace is > > > > Request processing failed; nested

Re: Give boost only if entire value is present in Query

It was not matching the results for that particular field below is the debug data (+DisjunctionMaxQuerynameSearchNoSyn:7 nameSearchNoSyn:armour)~2)^9.0 | ((brandSearch:7 brandSearch:armour)~2) | ((nameSearch:7 nameSearch:armour)~2)^4.0 | (keywords:7 armour)^11.0 | ((descSearchNoSyn:7

Re: Could not load collection from ZK:

This error is coming in the application which is using solrj to communicate to the solr full stacktrace is Request processing failed; nested exception is com.gdn.solr620.org.apache. solr.common.SolrException: Could not load collection from ZK: productCollection

Could not load collection from ZK:

this. Thanks, Aman Deep Singh

Re: Facet is not working while querying with group

or field. But _changing_ either one is > chancy. > > Best, > Erick > > On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 5:34 AM, Aman Deep Singh > <amandeep.coo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I tried to recreate the collection and its working fine, > > But if i try to change the any field level

Re: Give boost only if entire value is present in Query

On June 19, 2017 11:01:49 AM EDT, Aman Deep Singh <amandeep.coo...@gmail.com> wrote: >Yes alessandro, >I know that their us some downsight of using sow =false but if don't >use >it then neither shingle nor bhram will work ,and these are required in >my >case/setup > >

Re: Give boost only if entire value is present in Query

Yes alessandro, I know that their us some downsight of using sow =false but if don't use it then neither shingle nor bhram will work ,and these are required in my case/setup On 19-Jun-2017 8:18 PM, "alessandro.benedetti" wrote: Isn't this a case where you don't want the

Re: Give boost only if entire value is present in Query

o not want match when user query is like ABC or ABC XYZ then you have to use phrase queries or fields with keyword tokenizer etc. and in which case above queries will not work. Thnx On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 8:27 AM, Aman Deep Singh <amandeep.coo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > I ha

Re: Facet is not working while querying with group

iguous > depending on where the issue is encountered. > > Best, > Erick > > On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Aman Deep Singh > <amandeep.coo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > But I only changed the docvalues not the multivalued , > > Anyway I will try to reproduce this by

Give boost only if entire value is present in Query

categoryKeywords^11 keywords^11 nameSearchNoSyn^9 descSearchNoSyn^2 5 nameSearch^9 brandSearch^8 descriptionSearch^2 categoryKeywords^10 keywords^10 nameSearch^9 descriptionSearch^2 0 searchFields 100% *:* 10 *,score 1 after true false 5 2 5 true true 5 10 *false* spellcheck Thanks, Aman Deep Singh

Re: Facet is not working while querying with group

> Best, > Erick > > On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Aman Deep Singh > <amandeep.coo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Yes ,it was a new schema(new collection),and after that I change only > > docvalues= true using schema api,but before changing the schema I have

Re: Facet is not working while querying with group

the parent of the "index" directory) (stand alone) or create a new collection (SolrCloud)? Best, Erick On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 1:39 AM, Aman Deep Singh <amandeep.coo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > Facets are not working when i'm querying with group command > request- > face

Re: Possible bug in Solrj-6.6.0

rClientCache can be shared by multiple requests and should be closed when the application exits. Joel Bernstein http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 2:17 AM, Aman Deep Singh <amandeep.coo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > I think their is a possibl

Facet is not working while querying with group

:476) at org.apache.solr.request.SimpleFacets.getTermCounts(SimpleFacets.java:405) at org.apache.solr.request.SimpleFacets.lambda$getFacetFieldCounts$0(SimpleFacets.java:803) ... 39 more However if I try to query without grouping it is working fine. Any Idea how to fix this. Thanks, Aman Deep Singh

Possible bug in Solrj-6.6.0

n - 2017-05-30 07:32:54] at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.io.stream.CloudSolrStream.open(CloudSolrStream.java:299) ~[solr-solrj-6.6.0.jar:6.6.0 5c7a7b65d2aa7ce5ec96458315c661a18b320241 - ishan - 2017-05-30 07:32:54] Thanks, Aman Deep Singh

Re: Phrase Query only forward direction

//cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Other+Parsers#OtherParsers-ComplexPhraseQueryParser > > > > > > Something like: > > > > q=({!edismax … ps=0 v=$qq}) OR {!complexphrase df=nameSearch v=$qq} > > > > where =12345 masitha > > > > Erik >

Re: Phrase Query only forward direction

Yes Erik I can use ps=0 but, my problem is that I want phrase which have same sequence and they can be present with in some distance E.g. If I have document masitha xyz 12345 I want that to be boosted since the sequence is in order .That's why I have use ps=5 Thanks, Aman Deep Singh On 12-Jun

Phrase Query only forward direction

34 1.2 = parameter k1 0.75 = parameter b 5.2576485 = avgFieldLength 2.56 = fieldLength Thanks, Aman Deep Singh

Re: Solr Atomic Document update Conditional

ag.org> wrote: On 5/18/2017 2:05 AM, Aman Deep Singh wrote: > Is their any way to do the SOLR atomic update based on some condition > Suppose in my SOLR schema i have some fields > >1. field1 >2. field2 >3. field1_timestamp >4. field2_timestamp > >

Solr Atomic Document update Conditional

found a SOLR thread for same question http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Conditional-atomic-update-td4277224.html but it doesn't contains any solution Thanks, Aman Deep Singh

Re: Automatic conversion to Range Query

Yes hoss, it only convert to the range query when there is two token only,,BTW thanks for raising the issue On 11-May-2017 5:38 AM, "Chris Hostetter" wrote: > : I'm facing a issue when i'm querying the Solr > : my query is "xiomi Mi 5 -white [64GB/ 3GB]" > ...

Re: Automatic conversion to Range Query

or various Apple products. Could you not have an enumerated type for the products, and simplify everything? I must be missing something here. Cheers -- Rick On May 6, 2017 8:38:14 AM EDT, Shawn Heisey <apa...@elyograg.org> wrote: >On 5/5/2017 12:42 PM, Aman Deep Singh wrote: >> Hi Eric

Re: Automatic conversion to Range Query

12:57, Shawn Heisey <apa...@elyograg.org> wrote: > >> On 5/6/2017 7:09 AM, Aman Deep Singh wrote: >> After escaping the square bracket the query is working fine, Is their >> any way in the parser to avoid the automatic conversion if not proper >> query will be

Re: Automatic conversion to Range Query

eisey" <apa...@elyograg.org> wrote: On 5/5/2017 12:42 PM, Aman Deep Singh wrote: > Hi Erick, I don't want to do the range query , That is why I'm using > the pattern replace filter to remove all the non alphanumeric to space > so that this type of situation don't arrive

Re: Automatic conversion to Range Query

anything, also in the query I haven't mention any range > related keyword (TO). > If my query is like [64GB/3GB] it works fine and doesn't convert to range > query. > > Thanks, > Aman deep singh > > On 06-May-2017 12:04 AM, "Erick Erickson" <erickerick...@gmail.

Re: Automatic conversion to Range Query

is like [64GB/3GB] it works fine and doesn't convert to range query. Thanks, Aman deep singh On 06-May-2017 12:04 AM, "Erick Erickson" <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote: I'm going to go a little sideways and claim this is an "XY" problem, the range bits are a side-issue.

Automatic conversion to Range Query

arch:xiomi)) (nameSearch:mi) (nameSearch:5) -(Synonym(nameSearch:putih nameSearch:white))*(nameSearch:[64gb/ TO 3gb])*)~4) Now due to automatic conversion of query to Range query i'm not able to find the result Solr Version-6.4.2 Parser- edismax Thanks, Aman Deep Singh

RE: Solr Shingle is not working properly in solr 6.5.0

; >> Your fieldtype will look like this: > >> > >> - > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> - > >> > >> -- > >> Steve > >> www.lucidworks.com > >> > >&

Re: Solr Shingle is not working properly in solr 6.5.0

thus due to Boolean + it was not matching. Thanks, Aman Deep Singh On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 4:41 PM Rick Leir <rl...@leirtech.com> wrote: > Hi Aman > Did you try the Admin Analysis tool? It will show you which filters are > effective at index and query time. It will help you und

Solr Shingle is not working properly in solr 6.5.0

lso but nothing is giving me the correct response. Any idea how i can fetch that document even if the document is missing any token. My expected response will be getting the document "one plus one" even the user query has any additional term like "one plus one two" and so on. Thanks, Aman Deep Singh

Re: unable to get more throughput with more threads

You can play with the merge factor in the index config. If their is no frequent updates then make it 2 ,it will give you High throughput and less latency. On 24-Mar-2017 8:22 AM, "Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo" wrote: > I also did find that beyond 10 threads for 8GB heap size ,

Re: Solr shingles is not working in solr 6.4.0

, Mar 17, 2017 at 9:58 AM Aman Deep Singh <amandeep.coo...@gmail.com> wrote: > I also tried in 5.2.1 > for the query > > http://localhost:8984/solr/test/select?q=TITLE_SH:one\%20plus\%20one=xml=true > <http://localhost:8984/solr/test/select?q=TITLE_SH:one%5C%20plus%5C%20one=x

Re: Solr shingles is not working in solr 6.4.0

I also tried in 5.2.1 for the query http://localhost:8984/solr/test/select?q=TITLE_SH:one\%20plus\%20one=xml=true 0 1 TITLE_SH:one\ plus\ one xml true TITLE_SH:one\ plus\ one TITLE_SH:one\ plus\ one *((TITLE_SH:one plus TITLE_SH:one plus one)/no_coord) TITLE_SH:plus one* (TITLE_SH:one

Re: Solr shingles is not working in solr 6.4.0

-start.com/ - Resources for Solr users, new and experienced > > > On 16 March 2017 at 22:22, Aman Deep Singh <amandeep.coo...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > If I give query in quotes it converted query in to graph query as > > > > Graph(cust_sh6:"one plus one" has

Re: Solr shingles is not working in solr 6.4.0

tp://www.solr-start.com/ - Resources for Solr users, new and experienced > > > On 16 March 2017 at 13:06, Aman Deep Singh <amandeep.coo...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > For images dropbox url is > > https://www.dropbox.com/sh/6dy6a8ajabjtxrt/ > AAAoxhZQe2vp3sTl3Av71_eHa?dl

Re: Solr shingles is not working in solr 6.4.0

For images dropbox url is https://www.dropbox.com/sh/6dy6a8ajabjtxrt/AAAoxhZQe2vp3sTl3Av71_eHa?dl=0 On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 10:29 PM Aman Deep Singh <amandeep.coo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes I have reloaded the core after config changes > > > On 16-Mar-2017 10:28 PM, &quo

Re: Solr shingles is not working in solr 6.4.0

u definitely reloaded the core after changing definitions? http://www.solr-start.com/ - Resources for Solr users, new and experienced On 16 March 2017 at 12:37, Aman Deep Singh <amandeep.coo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Already check that i am sending sceenshots of various senarios &g

Re: Solr shingles is not working in solr 6.4.0

t; Regards, >Alex. > > http://www.solr-start.com/ - Resources for Solr users, new and experienced > > > On 16 March 2017 at 08:30, Aman Deep Singh <amandeep.coo...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Recently I migrated from solr 4 to

Solr shingles is not working in solr 6.4.0

Hi, Recently I migrated from solr 4 to 6 IN solr 4 shinglefilterfactory is working correctly my configration i But after updating to solr 6 shingles is not working