Hi all,
Does anyone here have any experience hiring solr experts? Are there any
specific channels that you had good success with?
Thanks,
Asif
--
Asif Rahman
Lead Engineer - NewsCred
a...@newscred.com
http://platform.newscred.com
/Support
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 4:59 AM, Asif Rahman a...@newscred.com wrote:
Hi all,
Does anyone here have any experience hiring solr experts? Are there any
specific channels that you had good success with?
Thanks,
Asif
--
Asif Rahman
Lead Engineer - NewsCred
and iostat. Recently
http://www.newrelic.com/solr.html has been released
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/how-to-test-solr-s-performance-tp881928p885025.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Asif Rahman
Lead Engineer
it into a field query by boosting date ranges.
You would group in date ranges: documents in September would be
boosted 1.0, October 2.0, November 3.0 etc.
On 6/5/10, Asif Rahman a...@newscred.com wrote:
Thanks everyone for your help so far. I'm still trying to get to the
bottom
of whether switching
#How_can_I_boost_the_score_of_newer_documents
Sorry, this doesn't answer your question, but does contribute the fact that
some author of the FAQ at some point considered index-time boost not
neccesarily unreasonable.
From: Asif Rahman [a...@newscred.com]
Sent
if I
would see a performance improvement by switching over to index-time
boosting.
Thanks,
Asif
--
Asif Rahman
Lead Engineer - NewsCred
a...@newscred.com
http://platform.newscred.com
titles may match other parts of this query
HTH
Erick
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Asif Rahman a...@newscred.com wrote:
Hi,
What are the performance ramifications for using a function-based boost
at
search time (through bf in dismax parser) versus an index-time boost
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Asif Rahman a...@newscred.com wrote:
Perhaps I should have been more specific in my initial post. I'm doing
date-based boosting on the documents in my index, so as to assign a
higher
score to more recent documents. Currently I'm using a boost function
I see that the entries for PorterStemFilterFactory,
EnglishPorterFilterFactory, and SnowballPorterFilterFactory have been
removed from the Analyzers, Tokenizers, and Token Filters wiki page. Is
there a reason for this?
Thanks,
asif
--
Asif Rahman
Lead Engineer - NewsCred
a...@newscred.com
shape data?
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.orgwrote:
On Feb 20, 2010, at 8:53 AM, Asif Rahman wrote:
One piece of functionality that I need is the ability to index a spatial
shape. I've begun implementing this for solr 1.4 using just the spatial
, at 4:54 PM, Asif Rahman wrote:
What is the prevailing opinion on using solr 1.5 in a production
environment? I know that many people were using 1.4 in production for a
while before it became an official release.
Specifically I'm interested in using some of the new spatial features
What is the prevailing opinion on using solr 1.5 in a production
environment? I know that many people were using 1.4 in production for a
while before it became an official release.
Specifically I'm interested in using some of the new spatial features.
Thanks,
Asif
--
Asif Rahman
Lead
://www.nabble.com/Facets-with-an-IDF-concept-tp24071160p24959192.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Asif Rahman
Lead Engineer - NewsCred
a...@newscred.com
http://platform.newscred.com
unmodified and post-process the query.
This solution is less elegant than one that could be completely contained
within Solr. I also imagine that it would be less performant.
Any thoughts?
Thanks in advance,
Asif
--
Asif Rahman
Lead Engineer - NewsCred
a...@newscred.com
http
Mangar.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Create-incremental-snapshot-tp23109877p24405434.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Asif Rahman
Lead Engineer - NewsCred
a...@newscred.com
http://platform.newscred.com
thoughts would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Asif
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Asif Rahman a...@newscred.com wrote:
Hi all,
We have an index of news articles that are tagged with news topics.
Currently, we use solr facets to see which topics are popular for a
given
idf's through the Similarity API.
Is my reasoning sound? Can you provide any guidance as to the best way to
implement this?
Thanks for your help,
Asif
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.orgwrote:
On Jun 23, 2009, at 3:58 AM, Asif Rahman wrote:
Hi again,
I
Hi all,
We have an index of news articles that are tagged with news topics.
Currently, we use solr facets to see which topics are popular for a given
query or time period. I'd like to apply the concept of IDF to the facet
counts so as to penalize the topics that occur broadly through our index.
I have been intending to although I have been dragging my feet on it. I've
never opened a bug before so I'm not sure of the protocol. If you don't
mind, it would be great if you could send me a pm and point me in the right
direction.
Thanks,
Asif
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Ensdorf Ken
Hi Otis,
Any documents marked deleted in this index are just the result of updates to
those documents. There are no purely deleted documents. Furthermore, the
field that I am ordering by in my function query remains untouched over the
updates.
I've read in other posts that the logic used by
Hi all,
I'm having an issue with the order of my results when attempting to sort by
a function in my query. Looking at the debug output of the query, the score
returned with in the result section for any given document does not match
the score in the debug output. It turns out that if I
21 matches
Mail list logo
