? Do i have to
call optimize more than once a day when i add maxOptimizedCommitsToKeep with a
value of 1?
can some1 please explain how this is supposed to work?
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Bastian Spitzer [mailto:bspit...@magix.net]
Gesendet: Montag, 23. August 2010 16:40
An: solr-user
opert IndexDeletionPolicy (SolrDeletionPolicy) in
solrconfig.xml to handle this.
My 2 cents,
Tommaso
2010/8/11 Bastian Spitzer
> Hi,
>
> we are using solr 1.4.1 in a master-slave setup with replication,
> requests are loadbalanced to both instances. this is just working
> fine, b
Hi,
we are using solr 1.4.1 in a master-slave setup with replication,
requests are loadbalanced to both instances. this is just working fine,
but the slave
behaves strange sometimes with a "SolrException log" (trace below). We
are using 1.4.1 for weeks now, and this has happened only a few times
s
you can check the admin panel to see if there are pending deletes/commits in
the statistics section.
older versions of post.jar dont auto-commit the changes, so if your xml doesnt
contain a
you could just create a commit.xml containing only the following:
and send it via post.jar. you can al
make sure you send a after add/delete to make the changes visible.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: e8en [mailto:e...@tokobagus.com]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 10. August 2010 10:04
An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Betreff: Re: solr query result not read the latest xml file
I already set in my s
Wildcard-Search is already built in, just use:
?q=umoun*
?q=mounta*
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: yandong yao [mailto:yydz...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 9. August 2010 15:57
An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Betreff: how to support "implicit trailing wildcards"
Hi everyone,
How to su
Im not sure if i understand your problem, but basicly it isnt Solr vs Lucene
but HttpURLConnection vs Solrj's
CommonsHttpSolrServer, because Server Query Times havent changed at all from
what u say?
Why arent you querying the Server the same way you did before when u want to
compare solr to lu
just define the keyword field as multivalued and add the keywords separatly,
not as single-valued-string.
cheers.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Shishir Jain [mailto:shishir.j...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 29. Juli 2010 17:10
An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Betreff: Facets on mul
You cant really. By searching you allways will find _documents_, and solr will
return all their stored
fields unless you specify which exact stored fields you want solr to return by
passing "&fl=" parameter
to your query.
The only aproach i can think off is (mis)using highlighting, search for
h
Hi,
which version do you use? 1.4.1 is highly recommended since previous versions
contained some
bugs related to memory usage that could lead to memory leaks. i had this gc
overhead limit
in my setup as well. only workaround that helped was a dayly restart of all
instances.
with 1.4.1 this iss
as far as i know this is not needed, the optimized index is automatically
replicated to the
slaves. therefore something seems to be really wrong with your setup. maybe the
slave index
got corrupted for some reason? did u try deleting the data dir + slave restart
for a fresh
replicated index? may
Hi,
are u calling on the master to finally remove deleted documents and
merge the index files?
once a day is recommended:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrPerformanceFactors#Optimization_Considerations
cheers
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Muneeb Ali [mailto:muneeba...@hotmail.com]
G
Hi,
did u send a at some time after adding documents? The added docs are
"pending" to be added
to the index until u finally commit then. You can see your pending added
documents count in the
statistics page in the admin panel
cheers
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: satya swaroop [mailt
Hi,
to use leading wildcards you may have a look at this one:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-solr-user/200910.mbox/%3c4ac4b71c.6040...@gmail.com%3e
basicly u just put a ReversedWildcardFilterFactory in your config and u can use
leading wildcards.
good luck!
-Ursprünglich
Hm seems i didnt read the 1st part of your Question:/ Forget what i just wrote.
:)
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Bastian Spitzer [mailto:bspit...@magix.net]
Gesendet: Montag, 12. Juli 2010 16:41
An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Betreff: AW: Copy Date Field and/or Using DateMathParser
Hi Chantal,
where is your Solr integrated? Where is this Date comin from? I personaly
wouldnt use SOLR for such
conversions, ist nice if there are such built-in features, but sticking to
java/.net or whatever
generates your documents seems much more comfortable. In Java f.e. this is just
2 line
Hi Chantal,
why dont you just add another Field to your Index where u put the Day only, you
can sort by this filed then
in your queries
cheers.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Chantal Ackermann [mailto:chantal.ackerm...@btelligent.de]
Gesendet: Freitag, 9. Juli 2010 11:45
An: solr-user@
What i forgot to mention is that those Errors only occur on the Slave, the
Master is working just fine.
Ram/Hardware/Java Version/Config/Startup parameters etc. are exactly the same
on both Machines.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Bastian Spitzer [mailto:bspit...@magix.net]
Gesendet
Hi,
We just migrated from SOLR 1.4 to 1.4.1. We are observing some new
Errors in the logs that didnt occured
before the migration, so we want to share them with you and are hoping
to get some help solving them.
We are using 1Master and 1Slave with replication on 2 different machines
running only
19 matches
Mail list logo
