session, maybe 100 at once? No idea, really.
Thankyou,
Chris
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 3:23 AM, Chris Cornell srchn...@gmail.com wrote:
Trying to create a search solution for about 20k users at a company.
Each person's documents are private and different (some overlap... it
would be nice
Trying to create a search solution for about 20k users at a company.
Each person's documents are private and different (some overlap... it
would be nice to not have to store/index copies).
Is multicore something that would work or should we auto-insert a
facet into each query generated by the
search. Unless a
field was added like date-added-by-ralph, date-added-by-sally (ugh!).
Or maybe diskspace is cheap and we just should strive for simplicity?
Thanks,
Chris
On May 17, 2009, at 5:53 PM, Chris Cornell wrote:
Trying to create a search solution for about 20k users at a company
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 8:38 PM, Otis Gospodnetic
otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com wrote:
Chris,
Yes, disk space is cheap, and with so little overlap you won't gain much by
putting everything in a single index. Plus, when each user has a separate
index, it's easy to to split users and
