Re: SnowballPorterFilterFactory and protected words

2008-01-28 Thread Daniele Salvatico
hossman wrote: I'm not sure i understand what you mwan. Why would protected words (in regards to the stemmer) reduce recall ? ... i guess it depends on the words you are protecting right ... but why would you wnat to reduce recall? isn't the goal usually to increases recall while

Re: SnowballPorterFilterFactory and protected words

2008-01-24 Thread Daniele Salvatico
Thanks, the solution is now detailed very clearly. Just one more point, more theoretical then technical: i'm using Solr in a e-commerce site, and i wanted to use protected words also to reduce recall for certain queries. It could be that a parallel approach using dismax boosting for fields

SnowballPorterFilterFactory and protected words

2008-01-23 Thread Daniele Salvatico
Hi all, i'm working with SOLR and i have an italian language documents set. I have a question about using the protected= attribute with SnowballPorterFilterFactory filter. Here's my schema.xml fieldtype name=text class=solr.TextField positionIncrementGap=100 analyzer

Re: - I/O exception (java.net.BindException) caught when processing request: Address already in use: connect while updating

2007-11-13 Thread Daniele Salvatico
one of those will help. I don't think this has anything directly to do with solr or tomcat. -- Ian. On Nov 13, 2007 9:16 AM, Daniele Salvatico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, i have a Solr instance running under tomcat 5.5. My application uses a java servlet to handle