Erick,
So that my understanding is correct, let me ask, if one or more replicas are
down, updates presented to the leader still succeed, right? If so, tedsolr is
correct that the Solr client app needs to re-issue updates, if it wants
stronger guarantees on replica consistency than what Solr
On 1/28/16, 1:08 PM, "Tomás Fernández Löbbe" <tomasflo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Maybe you are hitting the reordering issue described in SOLR-8129?
>
>Tomás
>
>On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 11:32 AM, David Smith <dsmiths...@yahoo.com.invalid>
>wrote:
&
cloud-jepsen-flaky-networks/
>
>So the fact that you encountered this sounds like a bug to me.
>That said, another general recommendation (of mine) is that you not use Solr
>as your primary data source, so you can rebuild your index from scratch if you
>really need to
could certainly
>invalidate some of Solr’s assumptions.
>
>
>
>
>On 1/27/16, 7:59 AM, "David Smith" <dsmiths...@yahoo.com.INVALID> wrote:
>
>>Jeff, again, very much appreciate your feedback.
>>
>>It is interesting — the article you linked t
itself.
>
>You might watch the achieved replication factor of your updates and see if it
>ever changes:
>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Read+and+Write+Side+Fault+Tolerance
> (See Achieved Replication Factor/min_rf)
>
>If it does, that might give you clues abou
I have a SolrCloud v5.4 collection with 3 replicas that appear to have fallen
permanently out of sync. Users started to complain that the same search,
executed twice, sometimes returned different result counts. Sure enough, our
replicas are not identical:
>> shard1_replica1: 89867 documents
I am trying to use “languid.map.individual” setting to allow field “a” to
detect as, say, English, and be mapped to “a_en”, while in the same document,
field “b” detects as, say, German and is mapped to “b_de”.
What happens in my tests is that the global language is detected (for example,
Shawn,
Thanks for the suggestion, but experimentally, in my case the same query with
facet.method=enum returns in almost the same amount of time.
Regards
David
On Tuesday, January 13, 2015 12:02 PM, Shawn Heisey apa...@elyograg.org
wrote:
On 1/13/2015 10:35 AM, David Smith wrote
I have a query against a single 50M doc index (175GB) using Solr 4.10.2, that
exhibits the following response times (via the debugQuery option in Solr Admin):
process: {
time: 24709,
query: { time: 54 }, facet: { time: 24574 },
The query time of 54ms is great and exactly as expected -- this
of filters. The API is different, you'll have to provide the intervals
yourself.
Tomás
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 10:01 AM, Shawn Heisey apa...@elyograg.org wrote:
On 1/13/2015 10:35 AM, David Smith wrote:
I have a query against a single 50M doc index (175GB) using Solr 4.10.2,
that exhibits
should create a Jira to add
this feature to interval faceting.
Tomás
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 10:44 AM, David Smith dsmiths...@yahoo.com.invalid
wrote:
Tomás,
Thanks for the response -- the performance of my query makes perfect sense
in light of your information.
I looked at Interval
Shawn,
I've been thinking along your lines, and continued to run tests through the
day. The results surprised me.
For my index, Solr range faceting time is most closely related to the total
number of documents in the index for the range specified. The number of
buckets in the range is a
16, 2014 12:01 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch
arafa...@gmail.com wrote:
Facet counts include deleted documents until the segments merge. Could that
be an issue?
Regards,
Alex
On 16/12/2014 12:18 pm, David Smith dsmiths...@yahoo.com.invalid wrote:
I have a prototype SolrCloud 4.10.2 setup
one replica doesn't agree with another, so the
above will give us place to look.
Best,
Erick
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 12:12 PM, David Smith
dsmiths...@yahoo.com.invalid wrote:
Alex,
Good suggestion, but in this case, no. This example is from a cleanroom type
test environment where
.
workarround is to set mincount=0 for your facet ranges.
: Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 17:17:05 + (UTC)
: From: David Smith dsmiths...@yahoo.com.invalid
: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org, David Smith dsmiths...@yahoo.com
: To: Solr-user solr-user@lucene.apache.org
: Subject: Identical query
15 matches
Mail list logo
