Field name filter

When searching data, I need to process field name similar to processing terms. Lower-case of field name so field name is not case sensitive (all fileld names are lower case when indexed), have synonyms for field names, example-if user types article:abc or user types content:abc it both cases it

Add fields to query when processing

How can I add a field name to query dynamicly? Examle: If user types in stock replace it with quantity:[1 TO *] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Add-fields-to-query-when-processing-tf4610578.html#a1317 Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Return only one result per results group

Thank you, I'll take a look. Pieter Berkel wrote: Debra, It sounds like what you are trying to do is implemented in a new feature known as Field collapsing (see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-236 for more info). Unfortunately it isn't quite mature enough to be included

Return only one result per results group

Is there a way to receive only one result for each group of search results depending on a specified group field. Example: Searching a list of articles with author as the group field would return articles that match the query but will return only one article per author even if the author has

Costume response writer

is not called (Even the first line of the write function in the costume writer,which is log.info(...) is not written out.). Any leads of what might be the cause? Thank you , Debra -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Costume-response-writer-tf3721357.html#a10412462 Sent from

Re: Costume response writer

, SolrQueryResponse response) throws IException { log.info(USING JDBC RESPONSE WRITER); The line USING JDBC RESPONSE WRITER doesn't appear in the log. Thanks, Debra -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Costume-response-writer-tf3721357.html#a10418873 Sent from the Solr

Re: Costume response writer

hossman_lucene wrote: can you clarify: 1) which version of Solr you are using (the Solr Implementation Version from /admin/registry.jsp gives the best answer) ... -Hoss Just downloaded the latest night build and viola it's back on track (with the other bugs...) --

Reload schema.xml

Is there a way to reload schema.xml while solr is running? TIA Debra -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Reload-schema.xml-tf3404798.html#a9483346 Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reloading solr schema file

=SolrCore.getSolrCore(); core=null; // first core.close(); ?? core =SolrCore.getSolrCore(); TIA Debra -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Reloading-solr-schema-file-tf3406562.html#a9489139 Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [2] SQL Update

I could create a list of field name + type, but doing so I might as well create it and add it to fields in schema.xml. Does solr reread the schema file when I post an add action or only on starup (or someother point)? In general, I wonder if adding the suffix for dynamic fields is not posing

Saving dynamic field name without dynamic extension

I want to add a suffix to my fields names to use the dynamic fields feature. Is there a way to save the field name without the suffix so users can search by field with plain field name? -- View this message in context:

SQL Update

What is the status of the SQL update? Should all database fields used in sql updates be added to schema.xml before running the sql update? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/SQL-Update-tf3358303.html#a9341018 Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [2] Saving dynamic field name without dynamic extension

Thank you, your suggestion looks like the way to go... Mike Klaas wrote: On 3/6/07, Debra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I want to add a suffix to my fields names to use the dynamic fields feature. Is there a way to save the field name without the suffix so users can search by field

Re: [2] Reindex only records that changed

I would like to avoid such a field in case tables are updated in programs not under my control + any program that updates these tables has to add logic for updating this field. Sergey Polzunov-2 wrote: additional field in your DB as flag? 1 - dirty, 0 - clean. Debra wrote: Hi all