If I understand it right, you want the json to only the new fields and not
the field that has already been indexed/stored.
Check out Solr Atomic updates. Below are some links which might help.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Atomic_Updates
http://yonik.com/solr/atomic-updates/
Remember, it requires
these tokenized keywords using debugQuery.
Thanks and regards,
Romita
From: Dikchant Sahi contacts...@gmail.com
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org,
Date: 01/21/2013 02:26 PM
Subject:Re: Tokenized keywords
Can you please elaborate a more on what you are trying
Can you please elaborate a more on what you are trying to achieve.
Tokenizers work on indexed field and doesn't effect how the values will be
displayed. The response value comes from stored field. If you want to see
how your query is being tokenized, you can do it using analysis interface
or
you just need to make the field as multivalued.
field name=last_name type=string indexed=true stored=true * */
field name=trainingskill type=string indexed=true stored=true
*multiValued=true
*/
type should be set based on your search requirements.
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 11:27 PM, anurag.jain
You mean to say that the problem is with json which is being ingested.
What you are trying to achieve is that you want to split the values on the
basis of comma and index it as multiple value.
What problem you are facing in indexing json in format Solr expects. If you
don't have control over it,
As someone in the forum correctly said, if all Solr releases were
evolutionary Solr 4.0 is revolutionary. It has lots of improvement over the
previous releases like NoSql features, atomic updates, cloud features and
lot more.
Solr 4.0 would be the right migration I believe.
Can someone in the
_should_ work...
Best
Erick
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 2:20 AM, Dikchant Sahi contacts...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
Does Solr 4.0 allows to update the values of multi-valued field? Say I
have
list of values for skills field like java, j2ee and i want to change it
to solr, lucene.
I
.
Especially since you could re-run the indexing as many times as necessary.
The UniqueKey bits are only guaranteed to overwrite older docs when
indexing, not merging.
Best
Erick
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Dikchant Sahi contacts...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Alex,
You got my point right. What I
Hi,
Does Solr 4.0 allows to update the values of multi-valued field? Say I have
list of values for skills field like java, j2ee and i want to change it
to solr, lucene.
I was trying to play with atomic updates and below is my observation:
I have following document in my index:
doc
str
that keeps events from happening all at
once. Lately, it doesn't seem to be working. (Anonymous - via GTD book)
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Dikchant Sahi contacts...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Erick,
Sorry for creating the confusion. By slave, I mean the indexes on client
machine
they are duplicate
records? Maybe the issue is there somewhere.
Regards,
Alex
On 13 Dec 2012 15:17, Dikchant Sahi contacts...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Alex,
You got my point right. What I see is merge adds duplicate document. Is
there a way to overwrite existing document in one core
shut down at the time) and restart Solr.
Why can't the boxes be connected? That's a much simpler way of going about
it.
Best
Erick
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 1:04 AM, Dikchant Sahi contacts...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Walter,
Thanks for the response.
Commit will help to reflect changes
:
But is that the best approach? If you use personIds in your second index
then you don't have to did that. Maybe you are after joins in Solr?
Otis
--
SOLR Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm
On Dec 11, 2012 1:21 PM, Dikchant Sahi contacts...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
We have two set
indexes. Commit when you are
done with your updates and Solr will take care of it for you. The changes
are not live until you commit.
wunder
On Dec 10, 2012, at 9:46 PM, Dikchant Sahi wrote:
Hi,
How can we do delta update of offline indexes?
We have the master index on which data
Multiple indexes can be setup using the multi core feature of Solr.
Below are the steps:
1. Add the core name and storage location of the core to
the $SOLR_HOME/solr.xml file.
cores adminPath=/admin/cores defaultCoreName=core-name1
*core name=core-name1 instanceDir=core-dir1 /*
*core
Try debugging it using analysis page or running the query in debug mode
(debugQuery=true).
In analysis page, add 'RCA-Jack/' to index and 'jacke' to query. This might
help you understanding the behavior.
If still unable to debug, some additional information would be required to
help.
On Tue,
DefaultSearchField is the field which is queried if you don't explicitly
specify the fields to query on.
Please refer to the below link:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SchemaXml
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 12:56 AM, Michael Della Bitta
michael.della.bi...@appinions.com wrote:
Hello, Lakshmi,
The
You are creating grams only while indexing and not querying hence 'ludlwo'
would not match. Your analyzer will create the following grams while
indexing for 'ludlow': lu lud ludl ludlo ludlow and hence would not match
to 'ludlwo'.
Either you need to create gram while querying also or use Edit
or back but
anywhere.
You are right I put the same NGramFilterFactory in both Query and Index
however now it does not return any results not even the basic one.
-Original Message-
From: Dikchant Sahi [mailto:contacts...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 7:54 PM
To: solr-user
Hi Manish,
The attachment seems to be missing. Would you mind sharing the same.
Am a Search Engineer based in Bangalore. Would me interested in attending
the workshop.
Best Regards,
Dikchant Sahi
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Manish Bafna manish.bafna...@gmail.comwrote:
Dear Friend,
We
20 matches
Mail list logo
