In general the algorithm considers what is more relevant and probably
you should check why one kind of result is giving always higher scores
than the others. Are you using norms (not setting omitNorms = true).
With debugQuery=true you can get a detail of how the score is
calculated.
That would be
Only one interval? in that case you could add a filter query and facet
in the regular way. That is:
facet.field=personfq=person:[A TO C]
But consider that you will get the search results that include those
persons only.
Thanks
Emmanuel
2012/3/1 AlexR alexanderroessler1...@hotmail.com:
Hi
i
What query parser are you using? It looks like Lucene Query Parser or edismax.
The cause is that wildcard queries does not get analyzed. So even if
you have lowercase filters in the analysis chain that is not being
applied when you search using *
Thanks
Emmanuel
2012/2/29 Neil Hart
I think that what you want is FieldCollapsing:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FieldCollapsing
For example
q=my searchgroup=truegroup.field=subjectgroup.limit=5
Test it to see if that is what you want.
Thanks
Emmanuel
2012/2/29 Paul p...@nines.org:
Let's say that I have a facet named 'subject'
No. But probably we can find another way to do what you want. Please
describe the problem and include some numbers to give us an idea of
the sizes that you are handling. Number of documents, size of the
index, etc.
Thanks
Emmanuel
2012/2/29 Michael Jakl jakl.mich...@gmail.com:
Our Solr started
Do you want to index the hashtags and usernames to different fields?
Probably using
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#solr.PatternTokenizerFactory
will solve your problem.
However I don't fully understand the problem when you search
Thanks
Emmanuel
2012/2/15 Rohit
Solr or Lucene does not update documents. It deletes the old one and
replaces it with a new one when it has the same id.
So if you create a document with the changed fields only, and the same
id, and upload that one, the old one will be erased and replaced with
the new one. So THAT behaviour is
What do you mean by static php files? As far as I know PHP is to make
pages look dynamic. If you want to index dynamic pages as they where
just HTML you will have to download them, and add them to Solr.
Programming a small program in SolrJ and using some HTTP library
2012/2/1 prasenjit mukherjee prasen@gmail.com:
I have the following requirements :
1. Adds : 20 docs/sec
2. Searches : 100 searches/sec
3. Deletes : (20*3600*24*7 ~ 12 mill ) docs/week ( basically a cron
job which deletes all documents more than 7 days old )
I am thinking of having 6
How are you building your query? For your case it appears that the
edismax query parser should solve it
A good solution to this kind of problem involves:
Storing norms (omitNorms=false) in the fields to search
Storing the position of the terms (omitTermFreqAndPositions=false) in
the fields to
^5000.0 id^2000.0
content/str
?
Robert McCarroll
Systems Administration
NYS Department of Civil Service
-Original Message-
From: Emmanuel Espina [mailto:espinaemman...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 1:42 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Match raw query
*:* is parsed as a MatchAllDocsQuery and * es a wilcard query on the
default search field. The matchalldocuments does just that, and the *
has to resolve the wilcard (that is building a automaton query in
newer versions of Lucene). Also if a document has the default field
empty that document will
I have queries with a big big amount of OR terms. The AND terms are much
more convenient to handle because they can be turned into several filter
queries and cached.
Thinking in innovative solutions I recalled the De Morgan Laws
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Morgan's_laws of Boolean Algebras,
Function queries don't work with multivalued field.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FunctionQuery#Vector_Functions
You'll have to think in another way of doing that. What do you want to
achieve with that map?
Regards
Emmanuel
2011/9/8 tkamphuis tom_m...@hotmail.com
Hi,
I'm working on
With SolrDeletionPolicy you can chose the number of versions of the index
to store ( maxCommitsToKeep, it defaults to 1). Well, how can you revert to
an arbitrary version that you have stored? Is there anything in Solr or in
Lucene to pick the version of the index to load?
Thank you
Emmanuel
If you can express what you want with a regular expression then the pattern
Filter should work! I'm thinking that maybe you tokenized the field and that
invalidated the structure of the html.
I would use a contents field analized with a
was focused
only in extraction of text for searching purposes.
Thanks
Emmanuel
2011/7/27 Emmanuel Espina espinaemman...@gmail.com
If you can express what you want with a regular expression then the pattern
Filter should work! I'm thinking that maybe you tokenized the field and that
invalidated
Well it appears to be some issue with the analysis. You can check the
http://localhost:8983/solr/admin/analysis.jsp (the admin page of your
instance, the analysis section) to see how the analysis is applied and see
the end result of aaa
You should work with the index and the query analysis
Regarding point 4, you will have to reload the indexes to preserve
consistency among the indexes.
When yo perform a commit in solr you have (for an instant) two versions of
the index. The commit produces new segments (with new documents, new
deletions, etc). After creating these new segments a new
That is caused by the size of the documents. The principle is pretty
intuitive if one of your documents is the entire three volumes of The Lord
of the Rings, and you search for tree I know that The Lord of the Rings
will be in the results, and I haven't memorized the entire text of that book
:p
It
20 matches
Mail list logo
