help,
Esther
From: Toke Eskildsen t...@statsbiblioteket.dk
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Date: 27/08/2015 12:27 PM
Subject:Re: Solr 5.2.1 versus Solr 4.7.0 performance
On Thu, 2015-08-27 at 11:23 +0300, Esther Goldbraich wrote:
We are using GC tuning options: Xgcpolicy:gencon
Found the reason for many evictions (bug in our code), please ignore the
specific question on filter cache.
All other questions (in bold) are still very relevant.
From: Esther Goldbraich/Haifa/IBM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Date: 27/08/2015 01:13 PM
Subject:Re: Solr 5.2.1
From: Shawn Heisey apa...@elyograg.org
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Date: 26/08/2015 06:25 PM
Subject:Re: Solr 5.2.1 versus Solr 4.7.0 performance
On 8/26/2015 1:11 AM, Esther Goldbraich wrote:
We have benchmarked a set of queries on Solr 4.7.0 and 5.2.1 (with same
data, same
Hello,
We have benchmarked a set of queries on Solr 4.7.0 and 5.2.1 (with same
data, same solrconfig.xml) and saw better query performance on Solr 4.7.0
(5-15% better than 5.2.1, with an exception of 100% improvement for one of
the queries ).
Using same JVM (IBM 1.7) and JVM params.
Index's
w/o grouping 131 407276
w/o sort on date 4217 4400 183
Shai
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Esther Goldbraich
estherg...@il.ibm.com
wrote:
Thank you all for collaborative thinking!
Ran additional benchmarks as proposed. Some results:
All solr caches are enabled
wrote:
On 6/24/2015 5:28 AM, Esther Goldbraich wrote:
We are comparing the performance of fq versus q for queries
that are
actually filters and should not be cached.
In part of queries we see strange behavior where q performs
5-10x
better
than fq. The question
twice (I think) if caching is turned
off.
Also, when you try to use the fq version, what are you using for the
main query?
-Yonik
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 7:28 AM, Esther Goldbraich
estherg...@il.ibm.com wrote:
Hi,
We are comparing the performance of fq versus q for queries that are
actually
Some clarification:
I would like to understand how solr processes fq (without cache) versus q
when sort and group are required.
From:
Esther Goldbraich/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL
To:
solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Cc:
Arnon Yogev/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL, Shai Erera/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL
Date:
24/06/2015 02:29 PM
Subject
=tdate
docValues=true/
Thank you,
Esther
-
Esther Goldbraich
Social Technologies Analytics - IBM Haifa Research Lab
Phone: +972-4-8281059
