Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Solr 8.8.0 released

Hi all, This release contains a critical bug, that should be fixed in 8.8.1 shortly. Please avoid upgrading to this release for the moment. https://twitter.com/ichattopadhyaya/status/1360163382171586562 Apologies for the inconvenience. Thanks, Ishan On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 6:01 PM Noble Paul

Re: SOLR upgrade

Just avoid 8.8.0 for the moment, until 8.8.1 is released. 8.7.x should be fine. On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 10:28 PM Alessandro Benedetti wrote: > Hi, > following up on Charlie's detailed response I would recommend carefully > assess the code you are using to interact with Apache Solr (on top of

Re: Asymmetric Key Size not sufficient

Recent versions of Solr use 2048. https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blob/branch_8_6/solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/util/CryptoKeys.java#L332 Thanks for your report. On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 3:44 PM Mahir Kabir wrote: > Hello, > > I am a Ph.D. student at Virginia Tech, USA. While working

Re: Excessive logging 8.8.0

This should be fixed now in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15136. Thanks Markus. On Sat, Feb 6, 2021 at 7:33 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think we should release a 8.8.1 with that fixed. > > On Fri, 5 Feb, 2021, 4:09 pm Markus J

Re: Solr Slack Workspace

No, it is not ASF slack. A separate slack org, just for Solr. On Sat, 6 Feb, 2021, 6:35 am Anshum Gupta, wrote: > Hey Ishan, > > Thanks for doing this. Is this the ASF Slack space or something else? > > > On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 2:04 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < > ichattop

Re: Excessive logging 8.8.0

I think we should release a 8.8.1 with that fixed. On Fri, 5 Feb, 2021, 4:09 pm Markus Jelsma, wrote: > Thanks! > > Op do 4 feb. 2021 om 20:04 schreef Chris Hostetter < > hossman_luc...@fucit.org > >: > > > > > FWIW: that log message was added to branch_8x by 3c02c9197376 as part of > >

Re: Solr Slack Workspace

an > wrote: > > > There is https://solr-dev.slack.com > > > > It's not really used, but it's there and we can open it up for people to > > join and start using. > > > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 5:38 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < > > ichattopadhy...@gmail.c

Re: Solr Slack Workspace

Thanks ufuk. I'll take a look. On Tue, 26 Jan, 2021, 4:05 pm ufuk yılmaz, wrote: > It’s asking for a searchscale.com email address? > > Sent from Mail for Windows 10 > > From: Ishan Chattopadhyaya > Sent: 26 January 2021 13:33 > To: solr-user > Subject:

Re: Solr Slack Workspace

We should update the official documentation for community page to include this Slack org. If someone would like to volunteer to submit a patch against lucene-site repo, would be great. On Tue, 26 Jan, 2021, 4:02 pm Ishan Chattopadhyaya, < ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > There i

Re: Solr Slack Workspace

There is a Slack backed by official IRC support. Please see https://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Users-Slack-td4466856.html for details on how to join it. On Tue, 19 Jan, 2021, 2:54 pm Charlie Hull, wrote: > Relevance Slack is open to anyone working on search & relevance - #solr is > only

Re: Cannot read ZK Kerberos conf when enabling java security manager on 8.6

I think this warrants a JIRA. To work around this issue for now, you can use an environment variable SOLR_SECURITY_MANAGER_ENABLED=false before starting Solr. On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 11:58 PM Jörn Franke wrote: > The solution would be probably a policy file shipped with Solr that allows > the

Re: Solr fails to start with G1 GC

Try using haveged for your entropy problem. On Thu, 16 Jul, 2020, 10:20 pm Walter Underwood, wrote: > Instead of editing bin/solr, you should be able to set GC_TUNE in > solr.in.sh, as I showed in my post below. > > wunder > Walter Underwood > wun...@wunderwood.org >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Solr 8.6.0 released

> I hear all of that and agree, obviously, but "curl > solr:8983/collection/dataimport?blah" in cron was *pretty freaking > easy* ;) > > Not sure why "pull" is elevated to "anti-pattern"; data is data is data > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 8:49 PM

Recent and upcoming deprecations

Hi Solr Users, Here is a list of recent and upcoming deprecations in Solr 8.x. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SOLR/Deprecations Please feel free to chime in if you have any questions. You can comment here or in the specific JIRA issues. Thanks and regards, Ishan Chattopadhyaya

Re: CDCR stress-test issues

FYI, CDCR support, as it exists in Solr today, has been deprecated in 8.6. It suffers from serious design flaws and it allows such things to happen that you observe. While there may be workarounds, it is advisable to not rely on CDCR in production. Thanks, Ishan On Thu, 2 Jul, 2020, 1:12 am

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Solr 8.6.0 released

ion on this, please start another thread in solr-users@ list, and more people can suggest best alternatives here. On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 5:50 AM matthew sporleder wrote: > Is there a replacement for DIH? > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 10:08 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya > wrote: > >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Solr 8.6.0 released

On Wed, 15 Jul, 2020, 8:37 pm Bernd Fehling, wrote: > > > Am 15.07.20 um 16:07 schrieb Ishan Chattopadhyaya: > > Dear Solr Users, > > > > In this release (Solr 8.6), we have deprecated the following: > > > > 1. Data Import Handler > > > &g

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Solr 8.6.0 released

it easier for users to use such features. Regards, Ishan Chattopadhyaya (On behalf of the Apache Lucene/Solr PMC) [0] - https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SOLR/Community+supported+packages+for+Solr On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 2:30 PM Bruno Roustant wrote: > The Lucene PMC is plea

Re: [EXTERNAL] Getting rid of Master/Slave nomenclature in Solr

. Of course, provided all usecases that could be solved using standalone can also be solved using SolrCloud. At that point, I'd love for us to get rid of the term "SolrCloud". On Sun, 28 Jun, 2020, 3:59 pm Ishan Chattopadhyaya, < ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > I would like

Re: [EXTERNAL] Getting rid of Master/Slave nomenclature in Solr

olr (or fork and go their own > way). > > Ilan > > On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 9:39 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < > ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Rather than getting rid of the terminology, we should get rid of the > > standalone mode Solr altogether. I tota

Re: [EXTERNAL] Getting rid of Master/Slave nomenclature in Solr

Rather than getting rid of the terminology, we should get rid of the standalone mode Solr altogether. I totally understand that SolrCloud is broken in many ways today, but we should attempt to fix it and have it as the only mode in Solr. On Wed, 24 Jun, 2020, 8:17 pm Mike Drob, wrote: > Brend,

Re: Getting authenticated user inside DocTransformer plugin

This is a problem, indeed. I've opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14491 to address this. On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 11:08 PM mosheB wrote: > We are using Solr's kerberos authentication plugin and we are trying to > implement field-level filtering based on the authenticated user and

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Solr 8.4.1 released

## 13 January 2020, Apache Solr™ 8.4.1 available The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 8.4.1. Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform from the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful full-text search, hit highlighting,

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Solr 8.3.1 released

//issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13971>: > > Velocity > > > >> response writer's resource loading now possible only through startup > > > >> parameters. > > > >> > > > >> Is it linked appropriately? Or is it some access rights

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Solr 8.3.1 released

## 3 December 2019, Apache Solr™ 8.3.1 available The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 8.3.1. Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform from the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful full-text search, hit highlighting,

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Solr 8.3.0 released

## 2 November 2019, Apache Solr™ 8.3.0 available The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 8.3.0. Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform from the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful full-text search, hit highlighting,

Re: Solr 8.1 issue with collection aliases

tions by other > people. > > > Am 16.05.2019 um 11:55 schrieb Ishan Chattopadhyaya > > : > > > > Does this warrant a 8.1.1 release? I think this is serious enough. > > > >> On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 12:03 PM Jörn Franke wrote: > >>

Re: Solr 8.1 issue with collection aliases

Does this warrant a 8.1.1 release? I think this is serious enough. On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 12:03 PM Jörn Franke wrote: > > SOLR-13475 > > > Am 16.05.2019 um 05:24 schrieb Ishan Chattopadhyaya > > : > > > > Please open a JIRA. > > > >> O

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Solr 8.1.0 released

= 16 March 2019, Apache Solr™ 8.1.0 available = The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 8.1.0 Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform from the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful full-text search, hit highlighting,

Re: Solr 8.1 issue with collection aliases

Please open a JIRA. On Thu, 16 May, 2019, 8:09 AM Jörn Franke, wrote: > Sorry autocorrection. It is not only a admin UI issue. I described in my > previous email that access through the collection alias does not work. I > cannot even do execute the select query handler if I use the collection >

Re: Solr 8.1 issue with collection aliases

Thanks Jörn for reporting this. Sounds like some backward comparability break with aliases. Can you please open a JIRA? I'll take a look at reproducing it soon. On Wed, 15 May, 2019, 7:18 PM Mikhail Khludnev, wrote: > It seems creating alias in Solr Admin UI is broken. It's a minor issue for >

Re: CVE-2018-11802: Apache Solr authorization bug vulnerability disclosure

This fix has also been backported to Solr 6.6.6 for users who are stuck with Solr 6.x. (Sorry, I hadn't updated the issue and hence this was missed in the original mail.) On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 12:35 PM Noble Paul wrote: > > CVE-2018-11802: Apache Solr authorization bug disclosure > Severity:

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Solr 6.6.6 released

5 April 2019, Apache Solr™ 6.6.6 available The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 6.6.6. Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform from the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful full-text search, hit highlighting, faceted

Apache Solr 7.7.1 released

1 March 2019, Apache Solr™ 7.7.1 available The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 7.7.1 Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform from the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful full-text search, hit highlighting, faceted

Apache Lucene 7.7.1 released

1 March 2019, Apache Solr™ 7.7.1 available The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 7.7.1 Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform from the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful full-text search, hit highlighting, faceted

Apache Solr 7.7.1 released

1 March 2019, Apache Solr™ 7.7.1 available The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 7.7.1 Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform from the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful full-text search, hit highlighting, faceted

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Solr 6.6.5 released

03 July 2018, Apache Solr™ 6.6.5 available The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 6.6.5 Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform from the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful full-text search, hit highlighting, faceted

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Lucene 6.6.5 released

3 July 2018, Apache Lucene™ 6.6.5 available The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Lucene 6.6.5. Apache Lucene is a high-performance, full-featured text search engine library written entirely in Java. It is a technology suitable for nearly any application that requires

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Solr 6.6.4 released

18 May 2018, Apache Solr™ 6.6.4 available The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 6.6.4 Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform from the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful full-text search, hit highlighting, faceted

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Solr 6.6.4 released

18 May 2018, Apache Solr™ 6.6.4 available The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 6.6.4 Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform from the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful full-text search, hit highlighting, faceted

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Solr 6.6.2 released

You can now access them. Thanks for your patience and understanding. On 18 Oct 2017 3:15 pm, "Ishan Chattopadhyaya" <ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Bernd, > > > I get something like "permissionViolation=true", even after login!!! > This is due

Re: zero-day exploit security issue

There will be a 5.5.5 release soon. 6.6.2 has just been released. On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 8:17 PM, Keith L wrote: > Additionally, it looks like the commits are public on github. Is this > backported to 5.5.x too? Users that are still on 5x might want to backport > some of

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Solr 6.6.2 released

we have to pay for seeing the issues? ;-) > > Regards > Bernd > > > Am 18.10.2017 um 10:29 schrieb Ishan Chattopadhyaya: > > 18 October 2017, Apache Solr™ 6.6.2 available > > > > The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 6.6.2 > > >

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Solr 6.6.2 released

18 October 2017, Apache Solr™ 6.6.2 available The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 6.6.2 Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform from the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful full-text search, hit highlighting,

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Solr 6.6.0 released

st for me. > > http://www.solr-start.com/ - Resources for Solr users, new and experienced > > > On 7 June 2017 at 10:40, Ishan Chattopadhyaya <ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > 6 June 2017, Apache Solr 6.6.0 availableSolr is the popular, blazing > >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Solr 6.6.0 released

6 June 2017, Apache Solr 6.6.0 available Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform from the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful full-text search, hit highlighting, faceted search and analytics, rich document parsing, geospatial search, extensive

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Solr 6.6.0 released

6 June 2017, Apache Solr 6.6.0 availableSolr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform from the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful full-text search, hit highlighting, faceted search and analytics, rich document parsing, geospatial search, extensive

Re: Atomic Updates

> Hmm, interesting. I can imagine that as long as you're updating > docValues fields, the other_text field would be there. But the instant > you updated a non-docValues field (text_field in your example) the > other_text field would disappear I can confirm this. When in-place updates to DV fields

Re: DistributedUpdateProcessorFactory was explicitly disabled from this updateRequestProcessorChain

Why are you adding these update processors (esp. the AddSchemaFieldsUpdateProcessor) after DistributedUpdateProcessor? Try adding them before DUP, and it has a better chance to work. On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Pratik Thaker < pratik.tha...@smartstreamrdu.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > I am

Re: Is CloudSolrClient thread-safe?

> I use SolrJ 6.4.0 and SolrCloud 6.4.0 Please upgrade to 6.4.2 immediately. 6.4.0 has major performance problems. On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 12:12 AM, Mikhail Ibraheem < mikhail.ibrah...@oracle.com> wrote: > Thanks Shawn so much. > I use SolrJ 6.4.0 and SolrCloud 6.4.0 > The code is very simple: >

Re: in-place updates

> For in-place updates, the documentation states that only the fields being > modified are updated, but does that mean that all other fields don't need > to be stored? Correct, in general there's no need to store the other fields. However, there's a niche case where if a simultaneous

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Solr 6.4.2 released

Hi Bernd, Can you please double check? I downloaded the 6.4.2 tarball and see that they have 6.4.2: [ishan@ishanvps solr-6.4.2]$ grep -rn "luceneMatchVersion" *|grep solrconfig.xml CHANGES.txt:1474: or your luceneMatchVersion in the solrconfig.xml is less than 6.0

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Solr 6.4.2 released

7 March 2017, Apache Solr 6.4.2 available Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform from the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful full-text search, hit highlighting, faceted search and analytics, rich document parsing, geospatial search, extensive

Re: update a document without changing anything

Maybe do an "inc" of 0 to a numeric field for every document. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Updating+Parts+of+Documents On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 2:13 PM, Dorian Hoxha wrote: > Hello searcherers, > > So, I have document that is fully stored. Then I make

Re: Writing Solr Custom Components

http://home.apache.org/~ctargett/RefGuidePOC/jekyll-full/adding-custom-plugins-in-solrcloud-mode.html On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 12:23 PM, John Bickerstaff wrote: > All, > > I'm looking for information on writing custom Solr components. A quick > search showed nothing

Re: how to update billions of docs

Hi Mohsin, There's some work in progress for in-place updates to docValued fields, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5944. Can you try the latest patch there (or ping me if you need a git branch)? It would be nice to know how fast the updates go for your usecase with that patch. Please

Re: Solr-kerbarose URL not accessible

This appears to be Cloudera search specific. The kerberos support in Solr is similar to, but not identical with, the kerberos support in Cloudera's Search. Maybe you could check with Cloudera's support? On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 8:06 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote: > On 2/12/2016

Re: Rolling upgrade to 5.4 from 5.0 - "bug" caused by leader changes - is there a workaround?

Perhaps you could stay on 5.4.1 RC2, since that is what 5.4.1 will be (unless there are last moment issues). On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 7:50 PM, Michael Joyner wrote: > Unfortunately, it really couldn't wait. > > I did a rolling upgrade to the 5.4.1RC2 then downgraded

Re: Kerberos ticket not renewing when storing index on Kerberized HDFS

Not sure how reliably renewals are taken care of in the context of kerberized HDFS, but here's my 10-15 minute analysis. Seems to me that the auto renewal thread is not spawned [0]. This relies on kinit. Not sure if having a login configuration with renewTGT is sufficient (which seems to be passed

Re: Solr 5.4 leader selection

Maybe, you could have a look at REBALANCELEADERS to see if this solves your usecase? https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Collections+API#CollectionsAPI-RebalanceLeaders On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 3:54 PM, wrote: > Hi guys , > i have a solr cluster

Re: how to secure standalone solr

Hi Daniel, That sounds good. It is a custom solution, which is a way to secure just about any server. I think Noble's point was about out of the box, community supported, way of securing Solr. Regards, Ishan On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 9:26 PM, Davis, Daniel (NIH/NLM) [C] < daniel.da...@nih.gov>

Re: Re: secure solr 5.3.1

rberose > > plugin is only able to secure solr in standalone mode. > > > > 2015-12-09 23:00 GMT+00:00 kostali hassan <med.has.kost...@gmail.com>: > > > >> -- Message transféré -- > >> De : "Ishan Chattopadhyaya" <icha

Re: secure solr 5.3.1

st...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >how I setting up Solr to use Kerberos ? i have to dowload kerberos and put > >the plug-in implementation in the classpath(/server/solr). > > > >2015-12-08 22:19 GMT+00:00 Ishan Chattopadhyaya < > ichattopadhy...@gmail.com>: >

Re: secure solr 5.3.1

AM, kostali hassan <med.has.kost...@gmail.com> wrote: > I folow this two resources and Iam stuck in > >- Create service principals and keytab files. > > > 2015-12-09 18:06 GMT+00:00 Ishan Chattopadhyaya <ichattopadhy...@gmail.com > >: > > > The kerberos

Re: secure solr 5.3.1

Alternatively, you could also try using BasicAuth, which doesn't require this additional setup of a KDC. On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 1:04 AM, Ishan Chattopadhyaya < ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > I don't have much personal experience with setting up a kerberos server on > a Win

Re: secure solr 5.3.1

the Windows host is able to access the ports of the guest machine. Better still, setup GNU/Linux VMs for Solr too. On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 12:39 AM, kostali hassan <med.has.kost...@gmail.com> wrote: > I install MIT Kerberos for Windows 4.0.1 > > 2015-12-09 19:05 GMT+00:00 Ishan

Re: secure solr 5.3.1

Right, as Bosco said, this has been tested well and supported on SolrCloud. It should be possible to run it in standalone mode, but it is not something that has been well test yet. On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 11:02 PM, Don Bosco Durai wrote: > It was tested and meant to work only

Re: Sold 5.3 with Basic Authentication in a not SolrCloud environment

At the moment, the Basic Authentication doesn't work with standalone Solr (non-SolrCloud). Kerberos authentication works. If you want support for Basic Authentication for standalone Solr, please feel free to open a JIRA and contribute a patch. On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Dominique Bejean

Re: Authorization API versus zkcli.sh

As I see things, if you're using Basic Authentication and/or Rule Based Authorization, then the security.json could be copied over to start things. On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 3:38 AM, Oakley, Craig (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] < craig.oak...@nih.gov> wrote: > Looking through >

Re: How to config security.json?

FYI, http://lucidworks.com/blog/2015/08/17/securing-solr-basic-auth-permission-rules/ On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Byzen Ma wrote: > Hi, I'm not quite familar with security.json. I want to achieve these > implementations. (1)Anyone who wants to do read/select/query

Re: Jetty Vs Tomcat (Performance issue)

Also, what are the specific performance issues you are observing? On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 6:41 PM, Upayavira wrote: > Just to be sure, are you installing Solr inside a different Jetty, or > using the Jetty that comes with Solr? > > You would be expected to use the one

Re: DELETEREPLICA command shouldn't delete de last replica of a shard

On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 11:20 PM, Erick Erickson wrote: > I see your point. In the custom routing case where it _is_ reasonable > to delete all replicas in a shard, DELETESHARD does the trick. > > It's reasonable to raise a JIRA I think so we have a record of the >

Re: Is it impossible to update an index that is undergoing an optimize?

On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 10:20 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote: > > Is there a decent API for getting uniqueKey? > > Not off the top of my head. > I deeply regret making it configurable and not just using "id"

Re: Find records with no values in solr.LatLongType fied type

There's also a function, exists(), which might work here, and result in a neater query. e.g. something like: q=*:* -exists(usrlatlong_0_coordinate) Haven't tried it, though. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Function+Queries#FunctionQueries-AvailableFunctions On Wed, Sep 30, 2015

Re: Passing Basic Auth info to HttpSolrClient

In latest Solr release, you can use the basic auth plugins for authentication instead of doing something at the Jetty level. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Basic+Authentication+Plugin Right at the end, there's a note on how to use SolrJ with this. Also, there exists:

Re: Sleep function query a big security hole?

+1, I agree. Opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8099 Thanks, Ishan On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 5:22 AM, Doug Turnbull < dturnb...@opensourceconnections.com> wrote: > Relevant code > >

Re: solrJ bug related to solrJ 4.10 for having both incremental partial update and child document on the same solr document!

Hi A.Nazemian, Thanks for your findings. I think I was able to reproduce what you reported. Please have a look at the tests for SOLR-6596 and add your comments there. :-) Regards, Ishan Did anybody test that? Best regards. On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Ali Nazemian alinazem...@gmail.com