Hello,
We've figured out a workaround for this, using another field that's
multivalued and populated with , and using that field in the
rord() function query.
Nevertheless, this feels like a bug to me.
Bye,
Jaco.
On 23 November 2016 at 09:04, Jaco de Vroed <jdevr...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
No, I reproduced the original issue, with the rord() function, on a brand
new index with docValues=true, with just one doc indexed in it.
Any clues?
Thanks,
Jaco.
On 21 November 2016 at 15:06, Pushkar Raste <pushkar.ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Did you turn on/off docValues on
Hi,
I made a typo. The Solr version number in which this error occurs is 5.5.3.
I also checked 6.3.0, same problem.
Thanks, bye,
Jaco.
On 16 November 2016 at 17:39, Jaco de Vroed <jdevr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Solr users,
>
> I’m running into an error situation using Solr
.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7495
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7495>, but that is a different case.
I can create a JIRA issue for this of course, but first wanted to throw this at
the mailing list to see if there’s any insights that can be shared.
Thanks a lot in adv
)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)
Sincerely,
Jaco Olivier
Please note: This email and its content are subject to the disclaimer as
displayed at the following link
http://www.sabinet.co.za/?page=e-mail-disclaimer. Should you not have Web
access, send an email to i...@sabinet.co.zamailto:i
to share some triumphs and pitfalls that were experienced.
* Sorry for hogging the User Mailing list on non-technical question, but think
this is the easiest way to get it done :)
Jaco Olivier
Web Specialist
Please note: This email and its content are subject to the disclaimer as
displayed
See http://markmail.org/thread/z5sq2jr2a6eayth4
On 12 February 2010 12:14, javaxmlsoapdev vika...@yahoo.com wrote:
Does anyone know good literature(web resources, books etc) on basics of
search? I do have Solr 1.4 and Lucene books but wanted to go in more
details
on basics.
Thanks,
--
/
filter class=solr.RemoveDuplicatesTokenFilterFactory/
/analyzer
/fieldType
Jaco Olivier
-Original Message-
From: regany [mailto:re...@newzealand.co.nz]
Sent: 08 December 2009 06:15
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: why no results?
Tom Hill-7 wrote:
Try
Hi,
Try changing your TEXT field to type text
field name=text type=text indexed=true
stored=false multiValued=true / (without the of course :))
That is your problem... also use the text type as per default examples
with SOLR distro :)
Jaco Olivier
-Original Message
=false required=true /
Congrats on figuring out SOLR fields - I suggest getting the SOLR 1.4
Book.. It really saved me a 1000 questions on this mailing list :)
Jaco Olivier
-Original Message-
From: regany [mailto:re...@newzealand.co.nz]
Sent: 09 December 2009 00:48
To: solr-user
Hello,
As far as I've been able to dig up, there is no way to use nested phrases in
Solr, let alone with proximity. For instance a b c d~10. I've seen a
special Surround Query Parser in Lucene that appears to support this.
Am I missing something? Any clues anybody?
Thanks in advance, bye,
Jaco.
Hi,
In my experience, you can just migrate to 1.4. We are using this in
production without any problems, and the Java Replication (
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication) works excellent.
Bye,
Jaco.
2009/6/17 vaibhav joshi callvaib...@hotmail.com
Hi,
I am using Solr 1.3 release
Running 1.4 nightly in production as well, also for the Java replication and
for the improved facet count algorithms. No problems, all running smoothly.
Bye,
Jaco.
2009/5/13 Erik Hatcher e...@ehatchersolutions.com
We run a not too distant trunk (1.4, probably a month or so ago) version
Hi,
Thanks for the suggestions! It looks like the MemoryIndex is worth having a
detailed look at, so that's what I'll start on.
Thanks again, bye,
Jaco.
2009/4/17 Steven A Rowe sar...@syr.edu
Hi Jaco,
On 4/9/2009 at 2:58 PM, Jaco wrote:
I'm struggling with some ideas, maybe somebody can
, but I am
looking for a more efficient way.
Is there a way to do this with Solr functionality, or do I need to start
looking into the Lucene API ..?
Any help would be much appreciated as usual!
Thanks, bye,
Jaco.
Hi,
After installing that patch, all is running fine for me as well - problem no
longer occurring and replication running great! The issue
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-978 has already been committed,
so it's also there in the 1.4 nightly builds.
Bye,
Jaco.
2009/3/26 sunnyfr
Hi Noble,
Great stuff, no problem, I really think the Solr development team is
excellent and takes pride in delivering high quality software!
And we're going into production with a brand new Solr based system in a few
weeks as well, so I'm really happy that this is fixed now.
Bye,
Jaco.
2009
)
- The directories index.x are still there after replication, but they
are empty
Are there any other things I can do check, or more info that I can provide
to help fix this?
Thanks, bye,
Jaco.
2009/1/22 Shalin Shekhar Mangar shalinman...@gmail.com
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Noble
need much, much more patience with
commercial software vendors..
Cheers,
Jaco.
2009/1/23 Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् noble.p...@gmail.com
I have opened an issue to track this
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-978
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ्
noble.p
നോബിള് नोब्ळ् noble.p...@gmail.com
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Jaco jdevr...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the fast replies!
It appears that I made a (probably classical) error... I didnt' make the
change to solrconfig.xml to include the deletionPolicy when applying
the
upgrade. I
files
- Slave: 152 GB in 3,941 files
Can anybody tell me what to do to prevent this from happening, and how to
clean up the slave? Also, there are quite some empty index.xxx
directories sitting in the slaves data dir. Can these be safely removed?
Thanks a lot in advance, bye,
Jaco.
trigger this?
User access rights for the user are OK, this use is allowed to do anything
in the Solr data directory (Tomcat service is running from SYSTEM account
(Windows)).
Thanks, regards,
Jaco.
2009/1/21 Shalin Shekhar Mangar shalinman...@gmail.com
Hi,
There shouldn't be so many files
in Tomcat 6 on Windows 2003.
Initially I thought there was some problem with disk space, but this is not
the case. Replication did run fine for intial version of index, but after
that at some point it didn't work anymore. Any ideas what could be wrong
here?
Thanks very much in advance, bye,
Jaco.
Very good! I applied the patch in the attached file, working fine now. I'll
keep monitoring and post any issues found.
Will this be included in some next nightly build?
Thanks very much for the very quick response!
Jaco.
2008/12/24 Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् noble.p...@gmail.com
James thanks
Hello,
I am planning a brand new environment for Solr running on a Windows 2003
Server 64 bits platform. I want to use Tomcat, and was wondering whether
there is any preference in general for using Tomcat 5.5 or Tomcat 6.0 with
Solr.
Any suggestions would be appreciated!
Thanks, bye,
Jaco.
Thanks for the fast reply!
I've tested SOLR-561, and it is working beautifully! Excellent
functionality.
Cheers,
Jaco.
2008/11/6 Otis Gospodnetic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't think there are preferences. If going with the brand new setup why
not go with Tomcat 6.0.
Also be aware that if you
shards= does return moreLiekThis
results. Am I doing something wrong or is this not yet supported..?
Thanks, bye,
Jaco.
);
}
return null;
}
}
This will need some work and additional error checking, and I'll probably
put a maximum om the number of tokens that is to be processed in one go to
make sure things don't get too big in memory.
Thanks for helping out!
Bye,
Jaco.
2008/9/26 Jaco [EMAIL
to be processed before it's
tokenized. Maybe my second scenario does not make sense at all..?
Any ideas on how to overcome this or any other suggestions on how to realise
this?
Thanks, bye,
Jaco.
PS I posted this message twice before but it didn't come through (spam
filtering..??), so this is the 2nd try
is tokenized.
Any suggestions would be very welcome...
Cheers,
Jaco.
2008/9/26 Grant Ingersoll [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How are you creating the tokens? What are you setting for the offsets and
the positions?
One thing that is helpful is Solr's built in Analysis tool via the Admin
interface (http
?
I can do some Java coding to achieve that from logical point of view, but I
wouldn't know how to structure this flow into the MyTokenizerFactory, so
some hints to achieve that would be great!
Thanks for helping out!
Jaco.
2008/9/26 Grant Ingersoll [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sep 26, 2008, at 9:40
Thanks for these suggestions, will try it in the coming days and post my
findings in this thread.
Bye,
Jaco.
2008/9/26 Grant Ingersoll [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sep 26, 2008, at 12:05 PM, Jaco wrote:
Hi Grant,
In reply to your questions:
1. Are you having to restart/initialize the stemmer
up then). Maybe my second scenario is totally insane?
Any ideas on how to overcome this or any other suggestions on how to realise
this?
Cheers,
Jaco.
PS I posted this message yesterday, but it didn't come through, so this is
the 2nd try..
,
Jaco.
Hi,
I ran into the same problem some time ago, couldn't find any relation to the
boost values on the multivalued field and the search results. Does anybody
have an idea how to handle this?
Thanks,
Jaco.
2008/8/29 Sébastien Rainville [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I have a multivalued field that I
possibly doing something wrong or is this a bug?
Bye,
Jaco.
That does the trick! Thanks for the quick reply (and for a great Solr
product!)
Bye,
Jaco.
2008/8/27 Grant Ingersoll [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Instead of solr.TestStemFilterFactory, put the fully qualified classname
for the TestStemFilterFactory, i.e.
com.my.great.stemmer.TestStemFilterFactory
!
Cheers,
Jaco.
38 matches
Mail list logo