({!join from=conceptId to=id
fromIndex=PartnerContent.SearchProducts}parentProductId:A10E5AC6-306C-4B71-BE03-62ACA0C4D34D)/str
/arr
That looks normal to me, but maybe it's not...
Thanks!
Jeff
--
Jeff Schmidt
535 Consulting
j...@535consulting.com
http://www.535consulting.com
(650) 423-1068
On May 7, 2012, at 5:29 PM, Francois Perron wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to know if there is some projects to integrate Solr with NoSQl
like MongoDB.
They already had a link like this between ElasticSearch and CoughDB. (Cough
River I think)
Thank you.
--
Jeff Schmidt
535 Consulting
. Is that possible with edismax? Or would have I have to
revert to dismax?
Thanks,
Jeff
--
Jeff Schmidt
535 Consulting
j...@535consulting.com
http://www.535consulting.com
(650) 423-1068
-with-solr-integration-details
wunder
--
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
--
Jeff Schmidt
535 Consulting
j...@535consulting.com
http://www.535consulting.com
(650) 423-1068
the * character).
Hope it helps.
Martijn
On 27 April 2012 21:12, Jeff Schmidt j...@535consulting.com wrote:
Hello:
In my application domain, there is something known as a microRNA star
strand, which contains '*' as a character. For example: hsa-let-7a-2*,
which is distinct from hsa
this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/should-slave-replication-be-turned-off-on-during-master-clean-and-re-index-tp3945531p3945531.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Jeff Schmidt
535 Consulting
j...@535consulting.com
http://www
just how join works. it identifies an (unordered) set of joined to
documents based on the matching joined from documents.
-Hoss
--
Jeff Schmidt
535 Consulting
j...@535consulting.com
http://www.535consulting.com
(650) 423-1068
to filter on the document ID intersection. This would
cause documents in the first index to drop out due to narrowing a facet in the
second index.
So, from a performance or strategy perspective, is it a bit crazy to make a go
of this?
Thanks,
Jeff
On Dec 11, 2011, at 12:17 PM, Jeff Schmidt
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
--
Jeff Schmidt
535 Consulting
j...@535consulting.com
http://www.535consulting.com
(650) 423-1068
of the scores from the joined X documents, or cause
any of the fields from X to be useable when faceting on Y. (Just putting
all that out there so you know in case those are deal breakers that are
going to force you to re-think your approach)
-Hoss
--
Jeff Schmidt
535 Consulting
j
don't want to open any old wounds, but does the
join exist? I not, I'll know not to pursue it any further. If so, is there
some solrconfig.xml configuration needed to enable it? I don't see it in the
examples.
Thanks,
Jeff
On Dec 1, 2011, at 9:47 PM, Jeff Schmidt wrote:
Hello:
I'm trying
core, and then join with the partner-tmo core. [Yes, the edismax handler in
the ing-content core and the second core are both named partner-tmo].
Can the JoinQParserPlugin work in conjunction with edismax?
Thanks,
Jeff
On Dec 4, 2011, at 4:12 PM, Jeff Schmidt wrote:
Hello again:
I'm
way than I outlined above?
Since we only have a single tenant to worry about, I could use a combined index
at least for a few months (separate fields per document type, IDs are unique
among then all) if that makes a difference.
Thanks!
Jeff
--
Jeff Schmidt
535 Consulting
j...@535consulting.com
then take this response and remove the prefix before returning the
values and counts to the client. It may inflate the size of index some, but
it sure beats my alternative proposals...
Cheers,
Jeff
On Nov 26, 2011, at 1:22 PM, Jeff Schmidt wrote:
Hello:
I'm still not finding much
investigation is needed.
Any inside information would be appreciated. Or, firmly stated I should not go
there would also be appreciated. :)
Cheers,
Jeff
On Nov 21, 2011, at 4:31 PM, Jeff Schmidt wrote:
Hello:
Solr version: 3.4.0
I'm trying to figure out if it's possible to both return
set if that's what you want.
Erik
On Nov 22, 2011, at 11:15 , Jeff Schmidt wrote:
Hi Erik:
It's not in the SolrJ library, but rather my use of it:
In my application code:
protected static final String SOLR_ALL_DOCS_QUERY = *:*;
/*
* If no search terms provided
-tp3527217p3527535.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Jeff Schmidt
535 Consulting
j...@535consulting.com
http://www.535consulting.com
(650) 423-1068
*:* in my application, and left q.alt=*:* in
place.
Hope this helps. Again, this is stock Solr 3.4.0, running the Apache war under
Tomcat 6.
Jeff
On Nov 22, 2011, at 8:05 AM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
On Nov 22, 2011, at 09:55 , Jeff Schmidt wrote:
When using [e]dismax, does configuring q.alt
? But, I don't need to
modify the document set itself (IDs etc.), just trim the field values per
document. Does that make sense?
I may well have to re-evaluate my data model, but I'd like to get what I need
with what I have currently defined if possible.
Thanks,
Jeff
--
Jeff Schmidt
535
Huse
Mobil: 920 63 413
--
Jeff Schmidt
535 Consulting
j...@535consulting.com
http://www.535consulting.com
(650) 423-1068
Hi Yonik:
On Jul 17, 2011, at 9:30 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Jeff Schmidt j...@535consulting.com wrote:
I don't want to query for a particular facet value, but rather have Solr do
a grouping of facet values. I'm not sure about the appropriate nomenclature
latching on to my hoped for approach after having such a
positive experience with faceting, and I should be looking at a different Solr
capability?
Any insight is greatly appreciated.
Cheers,
Jeff
On Jul 16, 2011, at 09:59 , Jeff Schmidt wrote:
Hello:
I have a need for applying certain
, and I don't see a way to do
this. I'm using Sorl 3.3.
Many thanks!
Jeff
--
Jeff Schmidt
535 Consulting
j...@535consulting.com
http://www.535consulting.com
(650) 423-1068
per disease?
But, faceting on disease gives me the document count for each disease type. Is
there a way I can use the faceting functionality and get the document IDs
rather than just a count? Solr must know the IDs are some point in calculating
the facet count.
Thanks!
Jeff
--
Jeff Schmidt
occurred. Often, the actual matched
characters are less important than the fact that the provided terms matched in
that field.
Take it easy,
Jeff
Jonathan
On 3/4/2011 10:09 AM, Jeff Schmidt wrote:
Hello:
I'm working on implementing a requirement where when a document is returned,
we want
to encounter this issue. :)
Thanks,
Jeff
On Mar 4, 2011, at 10:00 AM, Jeff Schmidt wrote:
Hello:
I'm trying to make use of FieldReaderDataSource so that I can read a (Oracle)
database CLOB, and then use XPathEntityProcessor to derive Solr field values
via xpath notation.
For an extra bit of fun
of XPathEntityProcessor.
What am I missing conceptually? I've found a few of references to the very
same problem, and I think I'm following the same pattern.
Thanks for any insights you can share,
Jeff
--
Jeff Schmidt
535 Consulting
j...@535consulting.com
http://www.535consulting.com
.nabble.com/Which-version-of-Solr-tp2482468p2498641.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Jeff Schmidt
535 Consulting
j...@535consulting.com
(650) 423-1068
http://www.535consulting.com
-lucene.com/
- Original Message
From: Jeff Schmidt j...@535consulting.com
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Sat, February 12, 2011 4:37:37 PM
Subject: Which version of Solr?
Hello:
I'm working on incorporating Solr into a SaaS based life sciences semantic
search
with index format changes along the way.
-Yonik
http://lucidimagination.com
--
Jeff Schmidt
535 Consulting
j...@535consulting.com
(650) 423-1068
http://www.535consulting.com
values of SolrInputField and instantiate those etc. Perhaps this is
not worth the effort and I should be be satisfied repeating the same
doc.addField() method calls.
Thanks,
Jeff
--
Jeff Schmidt
535 Consulting
j...@535consulting.com
(650) 423-1068
http://www.535consulting.com
...
This is really a big problem for me. Any suggests are greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Jeff
On Feb 13, 2011, at 9:15 PM, Jeff Schmidt wrote:
Hello again:
Back to the javabin iissue:
On Feb 12, 2011, at 6:07 PM, Lance Norskog wrote:
--- But I'm unable to get SolrJ to work due to the 'javabin' version
, but the return entity is simply a null
byte, which does not match the version number of 1 defined in Solr
common. ---
I've never seen this problem. At this point you are better off
starting with 3.x instead of chasing this problem down.
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Jeff Schmidt j
.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Jeff Schmidt
535 Consulting
j...@535consulting.com
(650) 423-1068
http://www.535consulting.com
Great, there be artifacts here! I was able to configure a repo using file:/...
to the dist/maven directory, and off we go.
Thanks again!
Jeff
On Feb 13, 2011, at 3:12 PM, Jeff Schmidt wrote:
Thanks David. I really like your book. Will there be a 3.x version coming
along? :) I'm glad
. I'm
sure others are using SolrJ successfully.
Thanks!
Jeff
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Jeff Schmidt j...@535consulting.com wrote:
Hello:
I'm working on incorporating Solr into a SaaS based life sciences semantic
search project. This will be released in about six months. I'm trying
36 matches
Mail list logo
