any update on this guys
On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 3:39 PM Kamal Kishore Aggarwal
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using highlighting feature in solr 8.3 with default method. With
> current behaviour, main search results and highlighted results are shown in
> different blocks. Is the
Hi,
I am using highlighting feature in solr 8.3 with default method. With
current behaviour, main search results and highlighted results are shown in
different blocks. Is there a way we can implemented highlighting within the
search main results, without having to return extra block for
Hi Erick,
Is there any workaround for this?
My requirement is to move solr data from solr 6 to solr 7.
I have thought to use /replication handler to do so. But, as per the case,
the solr 6 collection has 1 shard & 1 replica and we wish to have 2 shards
and 1 replica on solr 7.
If I enable
Hi Christine,
Thanks for the reply.
I had identified the same issue. So, applied the below fix in the custom
jar.
this.max = Float.parseFloat(max.replace("\"", ""));
this.min = Float.parseFloat(min.replace("\"", ""));
And, it worked. Thanks for confirming that this is an issue in solr 6.6.2
Hi All,
Appreciate if someone can help.
I am using LTR with MinMaxNormalizer in solr 6.6.2.
Model.json
"class": "org.apache.solr.ltr.model.MultipleAdditiveTreesModel",
"name": "XGBOOST-BBB-LTR-Model",
"store":"BBB-Feature-Model",
"features": [
{
"name": "TFIDF",
Hi,
Is there a way to normalize the value of fieldValueFeature
and OriginalScoreFeature features within some range i.e 0-1.
Lets suppose I have 4 products with some field values, I wish to normalize
weight within 0 and 1 using func (val-min)/(max-min).
Product FieldValue Normalized Value
P1 4 1
t be? Do you have really 10 or more concurrent users, or
> users that fire up queries at exactly the same time?
>
> Can you please monitor CPU and memory?
>
> > Am 05.04.2019 um 21:42 schrieb Kamal Kishore Aggarwal <
> kkroyal@gmail.com>:
> >
> > Hi,
&g
Hi,
Any update on this?
Is this model running in multi threaded mode or is there is any scope to do
this. Please let me know.
Regards
Kamal
On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 10:35 AM Kamal Kishore Aggarwal <
kkroyal@gmail.com> wrote:
> HI Jörn Franke,
>
> Thanks for the quick re
Hi Roee,
It looks the error is due to blank feature param value in the json.
"name" : "my",
"features":[],
"params" : {
I have observed that many a times solr ltr returns generic error that 'Model
type does not
exist', but later actually found to be an issue with json. Just wanted to
ved cpu/memory?
>
> > Am 22.03.2019 um 12:01 schrieb Kamal Kishore Aggarwal <
> kkroyal@gmail.com>:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am trying to use LTR with solr 6.6.2.There are different types of model
> > like Linear Model, Multiple Additive T
Hi,
I am trying to use LTR with solr 6.6.2.There are different types of model
like Linear Model, Multiple Additive Trees Model and Neural Network Model.
I have tried using Linear & Multiadditive model and compared the
performance of results. There is a major difference in response time
between
any suggestions ?
Thanks in advance.
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 6:22 PM Kamal Kishore Aggarwal <
kkroyal@gmail.com> wrote:
> I looks to me that I can modify the *SolrFeature *class, but dont know
> how to create IndexSearcher and SolrQueryRequest params as per the new
> req
*, Query originalQuery, Map
efi)
throws IOException {
return new SolrFeatureWeight(searcher, request, originalQuery, efi);
}
Regards
Kamal
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 12:34 PM Kamal Kishore Aggarwal <
kkroyal@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am working on LTR using s
Hi,
I am working on LTR using solr 6.6.2. I am working on custom feature
creation. I am able to create few custom features as per our requirement.
But, there are certain features, for which the data is stored in other
collection. Data like count of clicks, last date when the product was
ordered,
Any update on this.
Regards
Kamal
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:50 AM Kamal Kishore Aggarwal <
kkroyal@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks again Joel for your reply. I have noted your suggestions.
>
> I observed one more thing while using solrj to fetch the data using
they might be more efficient for your use case.
>
>
> Joel Bernstein
> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 12:05 PM Kamal Kishore Aggarwal <
> kkroyal@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > After I performed the test on my
and streaming expression also uses steam technique. So, are they internally
works in same fashion. Please confirm.
Regards
Kamal Kishore
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 5:51 PM Kamal Kishore Aggarwal
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks Jan & Joel.
>
> Though I will evaluate the performance over my data
gt; modify, join etc on the fly.
> >
> > PS: When the /export docs says it uses a streaming tecnique, it does NOT
> > mean that it has uses the solr feature streaming expressions :)
> >
> > --
> > Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
> > Cominve
Hi,
I have a requirement to fetch all data from a collection. One way is to use
streaming expression and other way is to use export.
Streaming expression documentation says *streaming functions are designed
to work with entire result sets rather then the top N results like normal
search. This is
specify any defType, they will be used. Though if you
> want to be explicit and specify it anyway, the value is defType=lucene
>
> Jason
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 1:05 PM Kamal Kishore Aggarwal
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Shawn,
> >
> > Thanks for the reply.
> &
n Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 9:41 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 6/6/2018 9:52 AM, Kamal Kishore Aggarwal wrote:
> >> What is the default query parser (QP) for solr.
> >>
> >> While I was reading about this, I came across two links which looks
> >> ambiguous to me. It'
[Correcting the subject]
On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 2:37 PM, Kamal Kishore Aggarwal <
kkroyal@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> What is the default query parser (QP) for solr.
>
> While I was reading about this, I came across two links which looks
> ambiguous to me. It's
Hi Guys,
What is the default query parser (QP) for solr.
While I was reading about this, I came across two links which looks
ambiguous to me. It's not clear to me whether Standard is the default QP or
Lucene is the default QP or they are same. Below is the screenshot and
links which are
Any help would be appreciated.
On 12-Dec-2016 1:20 PM, "Kamal Kishore Aggarwal" <kkroyal@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Any help guys ...
>
> On 09-Dec-2016 1:05 PM, "Kamal Kishore Aggarwal" <kkroyal@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
&
Any help guys ...
On 09-Dec-2016 1:05 PM, "Kamal Kishore Aggarwal" <kkroyal@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using solr 5.4.1. Here I am using dataimport handler to index data
> with SQL Server.
>
> I am using CLOB transformer to convert clob value to
Hi,
I am using solr 5.4.1. Here I am using dataimport handler to index data
with SQL Server.
I am using CLOB transformer to convert clob value to string. Indexing is
working fine but clob transformation is not working. Expected string value
is not coming for clob column. There is no error or
impossible token value (say XX) for null values.
> This can be done via default value update processor factory.
> You index some placeholder token for null values.
> fq={!terms f='queryField' separator='|'}A|XX would fetche docs with A or
> null values.
> Ahmet
>
> On Friday, September
Hi,
We are using solr 5.4.1.
We are using term filter for multiple value matching purpose.
Example: fq={!terms f='queryField' separator='|'}A|B
A, B, C are the possible field values for solr field "queryField". There
can docs with null values for the same field. Now, how can I create a term
ounters a parse error.
>
> P.S. It would help if you told us what you _did_ receive
> when you tried your options. Parse errors? All docs?
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:58 PM, Kamal Kishore Aggarwal
> <kkroyal@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
Hi,
I am working on solr 4.8,1. I am trying to find the docs where latlongtype
have null values.
I have tried using these, but not getting the results :
1) http://localhost:8984/solr/IM-Search/select?q.alt=-usrlatlong:[' ' TO *]
2)
Can anybody suggest me something..
On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Kamal Kishore Aggarwal <
kkroyal@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> I am currently working with Java-1.7, Solr-4.8.1 with tomcat 7. The solr
> configuration has master & slave ( 2 Slaves) architecture.
Hi Team,
I am currently working with Java-1.7, Solr-4.8.1 with tomcat 7. The solr
configuration has master & slave ( 2 Slaves) architecture.
Master & Slave 2 are in same server location (say zone A) , whereas Slave 1
is in another server in different zone (say zone B). There is latency of 40
ms
#solr.StopFilterFactory
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Filter+Descriptions#FilterDescriptions-StopFilter
HTH
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Kamal Kishore Aggarwal
kkroyal@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Team,
I am currently working with Java-1.7, Solr-4.8.1 with tomcat 7. Is there
any
Hi Team,
I am currently working with Java-1.7, Solr-4.8.1 with tomcat 7. Is there
any feature by which I can refrain the following words to appear in spell
suggestion.
For example: Somebody searches for sexe, I does not want to show him sex as
the spell suggestion via solr. How can I stop these
Hi,
Anybody tried upgrading master first prior to slave Java upgrade. Please
suggest.
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 6:50 PM, Shawn Heisey apa...@elyograg.org wrote:
On 5/19/2015 12:21 AM, Kamal Kishore Aggarwal wrote:
I am currently working with Java-1.7, Solr-4.8.1 with tomcat 7. The solr
Hi,
I am currently working with Java-1.7, Solr-4.8.1 with tomcat 7. The solr
configuration has slave master architecture. I am looking forward to
upgrade Java from 1.7 to 1.8 version in order to take advantage of memory
optimization done in latest version.
So, I am confused if I should upgrade
Hi,
As per this article, the linux machine is preferred to have 1.5 times RAM
with respect to index size. So, to verify this, I tried testing the solr
performance in different volumes of RAM allocation keeping other
configuration (i.e Solid State Drives, 8 core processor, 64-Bit) to be same
in
and how have you disabled role reloading?
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Kamal Kishore Aggarwal
kkroyal@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
It was found that external file, which was getting replicated after every
10 minutes was reloading the core as well. This was increasing the query
time
10:33 AM, Kamal Kishore Aggarwal
kkroyal@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Team,
I am working on solr 4.8.1 version. I want to integrate solr with NLP in
order to improve the search relevancy. I am following the tutorials:
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/OpenNLP
https://issues.apache.org/jira
Dear Team,
I am working on solr 4.8.1 version. I want to integrate solr with NLP in
order to improve the search relevancy. I am following the tutorials:
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/OpenNLP
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2899
Its says:
- pull the latest trunk or 4.0 branch
Hi All,
It was found that external file, which was getting replicated after every
10 minutes was reloading the core as well. This was increasing the query
time.
Thanks
Kamal Kishore
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Kamal Kishore Aggarwal
kkroyal@gmail.com wrote:
With the above
Dear Team,
I am working on external file field. But, I does not know the configuration
of how to replicate the EFF files.
This is master replication configuration:
core/conf/solrconfig.xml
requestHandler name=/replication class=solr.ReplicationHandler
lst name=master
str
Mangar
shalinman...@gmail.com wrote:
This might be related:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3514
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Kamal Kishore Aggarwal
kkroyal@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Team,
I have recently implemented EFF in solr. There are about 1.5
lacs(unsorted
.
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
shalinman...@gmail.com wrote:
This might be related:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3514
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Kamal Kishore Aggarwal
kkroyal@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Team,
I have recently implemented
Any replies ??
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Kamal Kishore Aggarwal
kkroyal@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Team,
I have recently implemented EFF in solr. There are about 1.5
lacs(unsorted) values in the external file. After this implementation, the
server has become slow. The solr query time
Hi Team,
I have recently implemented EFF in solr. There are about 1.5 lacs(unsorted)
values in the external file. After this implementation, the server has
become slow. The solr query time has also increased.
Can anybody confirm me if these issues are because of this implementation.
Is that
Dear Team,
I am trying to implement nested boosting in solr using map function.
http://www.example.com:8984/solr/collection1/select?q=laundry
servicesboost=map(query({!dismax
qf=titlex !v=$ql3 pf=}),0,0,1,map(query({!dismax qf=city v='mumbai'
pf=}),0,0,1,15))ql3=laundry services.
But this is
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Kamal Kishore Aggarwal
kkroyal@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Shawn for quick reply.
I am trying to change the code (removing the errors from the code shown in
image) will test the filter after that will update here.
Thanks
Kamal Kishore
On Mon, May 19
Even after making the same java version, it is not working. I am using
java.runtime.version:1.7.0_55-b13
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 2:05 PM, rulinma ruli...@gmail.com wrote:
normal, rewrite filter.
--
View this message in context:
Thanks Shawn for quick reply.
I am trying to change the code (removing the errors from the code shown in
image) will test the filter after that will update here.
Thanks
Kamal Kishore
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 10:17 PM, Shawn Heisey s...@elyograg.org wrote:
On 5/19/2014 1:10 AM, Kamal Kishore
I am using following field type with solr 4.2 its working fine.
field name=latlong type=location_rpt indexed=true stored=true
required=false multiValued=false /
fieldType name=location_rpt
class=solr.SpatialRecursivePrefixTreeFieldType
distErrPct=0.025
Dear Team,
I have created a custom filter factory for solr 4.2. It is working good.
But when I am trying to upgarde solr-4.2 to 4.7 version, it is reporting
errors.
Caused by: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Plugin init failure for
[schema.xml] analyzer/filter: Error instantiating class:
Dear Team,
I am new to solr. Please subscribe me for solr mails.
With Regards Thanks
Kamal Kishore
I am new to solr. I am not getting your answer. Can you please explain in
more detail.
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Kamal Kishore Aggarwal
kkroyal@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Team,
I have created a custom filter factory for solr 4.2. It is working good.
But when I am trying to upgarde
I am new to solr. I am not getting your answer. Can you please explain in
more detail.
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Kamal Kishore Aggarwal
kkroyal@gmail.com wrote:
I am new to solr. I am not getting your answer. Can you please explain in
more detail.
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 12:40
55 matches
Mail list logo
