able to hardcode it
within the instance, all I have to do is, launch an instance with it's
concerned image with the concerned static IP configured in ZK. Any advise
is appreciated.
Leo Prince
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 9:42 PM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Wait, r
n then use ADDREPLICA to place each and every node
> exactly where you want it with the "node" parameter of ADDREPLCIA.
>
> In both cases, the "node" is the string you see under the "live_nodes"
> znode.
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> On Mon, Dec
. One core is read intensive with less write and other is write
intensive with less read so dont want to mix their IO together. Earlier in
Solr4, we were able to hard code it in tomcat solr.xml, similarly is there
any ways that we can do this in solr7..?
Thanks in advance.
Leo Prince.
time frame of execution.
Thanks in advance,
Leo Prince
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 2:58 PM, Daniel Collins <danwcoll...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Leo, the general rule of thumb here is that the Solr index should *not* be
> your main document store. It is the index to your document store, but i
CT from previous version (4.10.2) and then UPDATE into latest
version(7.1.0). Any other better thoughts to re-index..?
Thanks in advance,
Leo Prince.
ase advise and thanks in advance.
Leo Prince.
il.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 5:09 AM, Leo Prince
> <leoprince.discussi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Is there any known negative impacts in setting up autoSoftCommit as 1
> > second other than RAM usage..?
>
> Briefly:
> Don't use autowarming (but keep caches en
. Hence we can avoid frequent
and numerous hard commits while we can search new docs written NRT.
Is there any known negative impacts in setting up autoSoftCommit as 1
second other than RAM usage..?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Leo Prince.
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 7:29 PM, Yonik Seeley <y
to search from other
nodes in SolrCloud.
Thanks,
Leo Prince.
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 4:01 AM, Shawn Heisey <apa...@elyograg.org> wrote:
> I'm supplementing the other replies you've already gotten. See inline:
>
>
> On 10/13/2017 2:30 AM, Leo Prince wrote:
> > I am gett
; are they really due to frequent commits..?
We are having plenty of requests taking more seconds to deliver from solr
irrespective of network overhead, so any thoughts whether commit frequency
affects solr latency..?
Thanks,
Leo Prince
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 2:46 PM, Emir Arnautović <
emir.arna
to the new requests when a
commit is going on. Will it be queued for new search to spawn or will
it be delivered with the old search existed..?
Thanks in advance,
Leo Prince.
11 matches
Mail list logo