I am trying to run through a few failure scenarios using a dual master
approach using NFS as a shared storage solution to hold the Master's
indexes. My goal is to be able to bring up a secondary master in the case
that the primary master fails. I have several slaves using replication to
pull ind
k version be slower.
>
>Were you running these tests for curiosity or is running from /dev/shm
>something
>you're considering for production?
>
>Best
>Erick
>
>On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Parker Johnson
>wrote:
>>
>> Hey everyone.
>>
>> Be
Hey everyone.
Been doing some load testing over the past few days. I've been throwing a
good bit of load at an instance of solr and have been measuring response
time. We're running a variety of different keyword searches to keep
solr's cache on its toes.
I'm running two exact same load testing
exer. You can be more deterministic than this by examining the log
>on
>the machine you're using to replace the master with and noting the last
>replication
>time and subtract your hour (or whatever) from that.
>
>Anyway, hope I haven't confused you unduly! The take-away i
I am hoping to get some feedback on the architecture I've been planning
for a medium to high volume site. This is my first time working
with Solr, so I want to be sure what I'm planning isn't totally weird,
unsupported, etc.
We've got a a pair of F5 loadbalancers and 4 hosts. 2 of those hosts
Thanks Larry.
-Parker
On 4/11/11 12:14 PM, "Green, Larry (CMG - Digital)"
wrote:
>Yes. It will wait whatever the replication interval is after the most
>recent replication completes before attempting again.
>
>On Apr 11, 2011, at 2:42 PM, Parker Johnson wrote:
>
What is the slave replication behavior if a replication request to pull
indexes takes longer than the replication interval itself?
Anotherwords, if my replication interval is set to be every 30 seconds,
and my indexes are significantly large enough to take longer than 30
seconds to transfer, is t
to allow the messages through.
Regards
Paul
On 7 April 2011 20:21, Ezequiel Calderara wrote:
>
> Happened to me a couple of times, couldn't find a way a workaround...
>
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Parker Johnson wrote:
>
> >
> > Hello everyone. Does anyon
Hello everyone. Does anyone else have problems posting to the list? My
messages keep getting rejected with this response below. I'll be surprised if
this one makes it through :)
-Park
Sorry, we were unable to deliver your message to the following address.
:
Remote host said: 552 spam scor
