(Maybe it's possible to "highlight" them in application layer, server side
> program or client side JavaScript, rather than Solr?)
>
> --
> Tomoko
>
>
> 2014-12-12 18:27 GMT+09:00 Pawel :
> >
> > Hi,
> > Thanks for your response. Do you maybe have an id
y in the client, ie without
> help from Solr?
>
> -Mike
>
>
> On 12/11/14 6:19 PM, Pawel wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> Thanks for response. It is quite important to me for example to highlight
>> multivalued field with many int or long tokens.
>>
>>
Hi,
Thanks for response. It is quite important to me for example to highlight
multivalued field with many int or long tokens.
--
Paweł
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Tomoko Uchida wrote:
>
> Hi Pawel,
>
> Essentially, highlighting is a feature to show "fragments of documen
Hi,
Is it possible to highlight int (TrieLongField) or long (TrieLongField)
field in Solr?
--
Paweł
ost part is not removed).
--
Paweł Róg
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 12:07 AM, Jack Krupansky
wrote:
> Definitely sounds like a bug! File a Jira. Thanks for reporting this. What
> release of Solr?
>
>
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
> -----Original Message- From: Pawel Rog
> Sent:
Hi,
I use edismax query with q parameter set as below:
q=foo^1.0+AND+bar
For such a query for the same document I see different (lower) scoring
value than for
q=foo+AND+bar
By default boost of term is 1 as far as i know so why the scoring differs?
When I check debugQuery parameter in parsedQue
Hi,
I need QParserPlugin that will use Redis as a backend to prepare filter
queries. There are several data structures available in Redis (hash, set,
etc.). From some reasons I cannot fetch data from redis data structures,
build and send big requests from application. That's why I want to build
tha
)
--
Pawel
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 8:01 PM, Pawel Rog wrote:
> Hi,
> Here is the whole stack trace: https://gist.github.com/anonymous/9056783
>
> --
> Pawel
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
>
>> Can you share the full stack trace dump?
&
Hi,
Here is the whole stack trace: https://gist.github.com/anonymous/9056783
--
Pawel
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> Can you share the full stack trace dump?
>
> - Mark
>
> http://about.me/markrmiller
>
> On Feb 17, 2014, at 7:07 AM, Pawel Rog w
Pool$3.run(QueuedThreadPool.java:572)
- java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:722)
Do you have any idea where can I look for?
--
Pawel
any advices?
--
Regards,
Pawel
Maybe try EdgeNgramFilterFactory
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters/#solr.EdgeNGramFilterFactory
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 6:57 AM, santamaria2 wrote:
> I'm about to implement an autocomplete mechanism for my search box. I've
> read
> about some of the common approaches, b
.. checked it :) Load rised three times :)
--
Pawel
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> Test first, of course, but slave on 3.6 and master on 3.5 should be
> fine. If you're
> getting evictions with the cache settings that high, you really want
> to lo
4000 (hit rate about
85%) and
16000 (hitrate about 91%). I think that also using LFU cache can be helpful
but
it makes me to migrate to 3.6. Do you think it is reasonable to use slave on
version 3.6 and master on 3.5?
Once again, Thanks for your help
--
Pawel
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 7:22 PM
haven't used Memory Anayzer yet. Could you write more details about it?
--
Regards,
Pawel
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> Hmmm, I think you may be looking at the wrong thing here. Generally, a
> filterCache
> entry will be maxDocs/8 (plus some overhead), s
If there are only 100'000 documents dump all document ids and make diff
If you're using linux based system you can just use simple tools to do it.
Something like that can be helpful
curl "http://your.hostA:port/solr/index/select?*:*&fl=id&wt=csv"; > /tmp/idsA
curl "http://your.hostB:port/solr/inde
M
settings.
--
Regards,
Pawel
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Peter Markey wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a solr cloud setup based on a blog (
> http://outerthought.org/blog/491-ot.html) and am able to bring up the
> instances and cores. But when I start indexing data (through csv update)
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#solr.ReversedWildcardFilterFactory
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 7:08 AM, Ishan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need to query on solr with * as a first character in query.
> For eg. Content indexed in* "Be careful"
> *and query i want to fire is **ful
>
Thanks a lot, I'll read it :) It seems to be helpfull
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
>
>> Is there any possibility to boost
>> terms during indexing? Searching
>> that using google I found information that there is no such
>> feature in
>> Solr (we can only boost fields). Is
Once I had the same problem. I didn't know what's going on. After few
moment of analysis I created completely new index and removed old one
(I hadn't enough time to analyze problem). Problem didn't come back
any more.
--
Regards,
Pawel
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 8:23 PM, Thomas
built into the system (i.e. indexing, commit and replication)
>
> Best
> Erick
>
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Pawel Rog wrote:
>> Hello. I have some problem which i'd like to solve using solr. I have
>> user profile which has some kind of messages in it. Use
Yes it works. Thanks a lot.
But I stil don't understand why in solr 1.4 that option was efficient
but in solr 3.5 not
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 11:01 PM, Yonik Seeley
wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 7:08 AM, Pawel Rog wrote:
>> at
>> org.apache.solr.search.SolrInd
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 9:05 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> : I tried to use index from 1.4 (load was the same as on index from 3.5)
> : but there was problem with synchronization with master (invalid
> : javabin format)
> : Then I built new index on 3.5 with luceneMatchVersion LUCENE_35
>
> why w
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/838/cpuusage.png/
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 9:18 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> : I attach chart which presents cpu usage. Solr 3.5 uses almost all cpu
> : (left side of chart).
>
> FWIW: The mailing list software filters out most attachments (there are
> some e
Thread.run(QueuedThreadPool.java:582)
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Pawel Rog wrote:
> I attach chart which presents cpu usage. Solr 3.5 uses almost all cpu
> (left side of chart).
> at the begining of chart there was about 60rps and about 100rps
> (before turning off solr 3.5). Then there
I attach chart which presents cpu usage. Solr 3.5 uses almost all cpu
(left side of chart).
at the begining of chart there was about 60rps and about 100rps
(before turning off solr 3.5). Then there was 1.4 turned on with
100rps.
--
Pawel
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 9:07 AM, Pawel Rog wrote:
> *
worse but maximum time is better.
It doesn't change propotion of cpu usage (3.5 uses much more cpu).
--
Pawel
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 12:17 AM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> : > previous Solr 1.4 index? what does a directory listing (including file
> : > sizes) look like for b
IO waits about 0-2%
Didn't see any suspicious activity in logs, but I can check it again
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 11:40 PM, Darren Govoni wrote:
> Any suspicous activity in the logs? what about disk activity?
>
>
> On 11/29/2011 05:22 PM, Pawel Rog wrote:
>>
>> On
onfig.xml
> for that URL to work...
> '
>
Will check it :)
>
> : in my last pos i mean
> : default operation AND
> : promoted - int
> : ending - int
> : b_count - int
> : name - text
> : cat1 - int
> : cat2 - int
> :
> : On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 7:54 PM,
in my last pos i mean
default operation AND
promoted - int
ending - int
b_count - int
name - text
cat1 - int
cat2 - int
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Pawel Rog wrote:
> examples
>
> facet=true&sort=promoted+desc,ending+asc,b_count+desc&facet.mincount=1&start=0&q=nam
on and solr 3.5 reached 1200% cpu
utilization on same machine
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Yonik Seeley
wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Pawel wrote:
>> I've build index on solr 1.4 some time ago (about 18milions documents,
>> about 8GB). I need new features from n
I've build index on solr 1.4 some time ago (about 18milions documents,
about 8GB). I need new features from newer version of solr, so i
decided to upgrade solr version from 1.4 to 3.5.
* I created new solr master on new physical machine
* then I created new index using the same schema as in earlie
32 matches
Mail list logo
