SOLR deleted almost everything?

=true/ field name=type type=string indexed=true stored=true multiValued=true/ field name=url type=string indexed=true stored=true multiValued=true/ Thanks for any insight into why I broke it! -Reece

Question about rating documents

this and still have the best match ranking of the results according to search terms entered by the users. I was hoping someone had done something similar or would have some insight on it. Thanks in advance! -Reece

Re: Question about rating documents

-5 for each document, and took that and used it to then add a boost to the fields I was actually searching on (or the final score) that would probably work, is that possible? -Reece On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Matthew Runo mr...@zappos.com wrote: You could use a boost function to gently

Re: Question about rating documents

Re-indexing so much would be a pretty big pain. I do have a unique ID for each document though that I use for updating them every day as they change. -Reece On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com wrote: This may not be practical, as it would involve re

Re: Problem with html code inside xml

Just use cdata to have the parser ignore the html characters. http://www.w3schools.com/xml/xml_cdata.asp -Reece On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Latj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When I use HTML::Entities to encode my text, I get this error: SEVERE: org.xmlpull.v1.XmlPullParserException

Re: Ranking search results by content type

) OR ((search string) AND type:B^10) OR etc etc -Reece On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 10:18 AM, James Wiegand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi there, What I am trying to do is get search results sorted by content type, since there is an order in which results are preferred, for example: * Topics * Postings

Re: out of memory every time

used the example start.jar and didn't specify any memory constraints. My job ran for 3 days, and finished without any errors or memory problems. The only difference I see is that I didn't use any dynamic fields, and I only stored 2 fields instead of them all. Just my $0.02 -Reece On Mon, Mar 3

Re: Newbie question about search

you post. 4) Ensure it says the document was added and committed in the stats 5) search on just the id - just to verify you can find it at all. Once you can get it to return something, you can build on that. -Reece On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 8:05 AM, x8nnn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I checked

Re: Indexing content, storing html

it's tag's will be rendered as the field value. It only breaks if your html string has a ]] in it to end the data tag. -Reece On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 12:19 PM, Paul deGrandis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I'm working on a solr app that pulls HTML from an embedded JavaScript WYSIWYG

Re: Indexing content, storing html

Well I don't remember the specific name of it, I just wrote that because it sounded close :) There is a list of them here though: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters -Reece On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 2:10 PM, Paul deGrandis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks! Does Solr

Re: Newbie question about search

Sounds like the docs aren't committed maybe? Go to /solr/admin/stats.jsp and look for: docsPending : X Where X is the number of docs that aren't committed yet. -Reece On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 3:07 PM, x8nnn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I tried to verify the readerdir. Which is fine. Inside

Re: Questions about filters and scoring

The omitNorms=true attribute worked perfectly, thanks Yonik! Also, the stopword issue isn't happening anymore, go figure. I probably had a mistype or something as well, Thanks for the help! -Reece On Feb 18, 2008 7:17 PM, Reece [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For #1, I just testing again and found

Re: escaping special chars in query

are + - || ! ( ) { } [ ] ^ ~ * ? : \ To escape these character use the \ before the character. For example to search for (1+1):2 use the query: \(1\+1\)\:2 -Reece On Feb 19, 2008 12:07 PM, zqzuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, solr have reserved some special chars in building its queries, such as + * : and so on, thus any

Re: quick question

/fieldType Any help or advice would be greatly appreciated, thanks! -Reece

Questions about filters and scoring

/ /analyzer /fieldType Any help or advice would be greatly appreciated, thanks! -Reece

Re: Questions about filters and scoring

it goes, but that looks like exactly what I needed. For #3, I'll test it again tomorrow and make sure I didn't have a mistype or something. Thanks for the help! -Reece On Feb 18, 2008 5:11 PM, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Feb 18, 2008 5:05 PM, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote