Re: Highlighting the search keywords

, but its not working. Am I missing something? Thanks Renuka Srishti On Wed 1 Aug, 2018, 12:05 Nicolas Franck, wrote: > Nope, that is how it works. It is not in place. > > > On 31 Jul 2018, at 21:57, Renuka Srishti > wrote: > > > > Hi All, > > > > I was

Highlighting the search keywords

Hi All, I was using highlighting in solr, solr gives highlighting results within the response but not included within the documents. Am i missing something? Can i configure so that it can show highlighted keywords matched within the documents. Thanks Renuka Srishti

Re: Search without passing any field

Okay, great. I will start with the available solution . My index is less than yours, so may be it will work. Thanks Renuka Srishti On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 12:04 AM, Walter Underwood wrote: > No, it won’t slow down performance, but it might use more disk space for > the index. > > S

Re: Search without passing any field

by that type > (probably text). With eDismax, if your field is string, you have to > match it exactly. Unless you copyField and process it twice. And so > on. You have a lot of options, depending on your use cases. > > Good luck, >Alex. > > On 29 July 2018 at 14:15,

Re: Search without passing any field

Yeah, I read that, but it will slow down the performance, as copying all the fields and put that data in one field. I think for large index it is not the right way to do. Am I right? Regards, Renuka Srishti On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 11:39 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote: > Did you go thro

Re: Search without passing any field

e fields otherwise it will not work. If I will put "df" and "qf" value as "name", so it will return only doc1, but I want to return both documents when I query "test" (Because description also contains "test"). Will it be possible without configur

Search without passing any field

otherwise I will not get results. What is the way if I want to search on all documents without mentioning any field. for example : I am passing "q":"xyz" If I query like that, it should return all the documents containing that value. No need to mention the fields. Thanks Renuka Srishti

Parameter Mapping

ticket for it? Thanks Renuka Srishti

Re: Multiple context fields in suggester component

Thanks Alessandro Benedetti for the response. Can you please share the resources, so that I can explore more about customization of context filter. On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 5:01 PM, Alessandro Benedetti wrote: > Simple answer is No. > Only one context field is supported out

Multiple context fields in suggester component

Hello All, Is there any way to set multiple context fields in suggester component? Or is there any way to apply multiple filters with suggester component in solr? Thanks Renuka Srishti

Re: TimeZone issue

Yes, we have TZ parameter for that which worked only for date math. I need to convert the date time zone on the client side. Thanks Renuka Srishti On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 8:51 PM, Shawn Heisey <apa...@elyograg.org> wrote: > On 11/16/2017 4:54 AM, Renuka Srishti wrote: > >&g

Re: TimeZone issue

Hii Rick, All clients are in different time zone. So I was searching for some support which can convert the date fields in the query response in given time zone. Thanks Renuka Srishti On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 5:58 PM, Rick Leir <rl...@leirtech.com> wrote: > Renuka > Are your

Re: TimeZone issue

alternate for this. Thanks Renuka Srishti On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 6:16 PM, Shawn Heisey <apa...@elyograg.org> wrote: > On 11/15/2017 5:34 AM, Renuka Srishti wrote: > >> I am working on CSV export using Apache Solr. I have written all the >> required query and set wt as CSV. I am

TimeZone issue

to clientTimeZone direclty in the Solr response? When I extract the date from the Solr response, I can convert it into clientTimeZone by implementing a custom method. But I want the date in client TimeZone direclty in the solr response. Thanks Renuka Srishti

Re: Stats component with function

e to support all functions like it supports ord().If I am going wrong please correct me. Thanks Renuka Srishti On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 2:05 PM, Renuka Srishti <renuka.srisht...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello All > > Here is the link > <https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_0/fa

Re: Query Boosting and sort

Sorry for late reply. Thanks Erick for the solution, you got my problem and the picture is right. I have resolved my problem with the similar approach you mentioned here. Regards, Renuka Srishti On Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 11:45 PM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm a c

Stats component with function

Hello All Here is the link <https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_0/faceting.html#combining-stats-component-with-pivots> for the reference. I want to use sub() by passing the min and max value of the price, can we perform this type of action, with the query given in the link. Thanks

Re: Query Boosting and sort

, in which I have applied the phrase boosting to maintain relevancy.( Most relevant result will show on the top). - Now If I applied keyword search and then I want to sort the result, how I can achieve this?(Sorting completely overrides scoring). Thanks Renuka Srishti On Sat, Sep 9, 2017

Query Boosting and sort

Hello All, I am trying to use sort parameter and phrase boosting together in search. But, if I use the sort parameter, it seems like Phrase Boosting does not work with it. Thanks Renuka Srishti

Re: Index relational database

Thank all for sharing your thoughts :) On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 5:28 PM, Susheel Kumar <susheel2...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, if you can avoid join and work with flat/denormalized structure then > that's the best. > > On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 3:54 AM, Renuka Srishti < > re

Re: Index relational database

; > > If you can't do that, the join query parser might work for you. > > > > On Aug 30, 2017 4:49 AM, "Renuka Srishti" <renuka.srisht...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> Thanks Susheel for your response. > >> Here is the scenario about w

Re: Index relational database

Thanks Susheel for your response. Here is the scenario about which I am talking: - Let suppose there are two documents doc1 and doc2. - I want to fetch the data from doc2 on the basis of doc1 fields which are related to doc2. How to achieve this efficiently. Thanks, Renuka Srishti

Re: Indexed=false for a field,but still able to search on field.

can not do faceting on this field as well. If you will apply seach on this field in the Solr Admin Panel, no result found. But you can see this field on doc there. #2. Its searchable and can do faceting also. Please correct me, if I am going wrong. Thanks Renuka Srishti On Tue, Aug 29

Index relational database

Hii, What is the best way to index relational database, and how it impacts on the performance? Thanks Renuka Srishti