, May 15, 2012 at 11:26 PM, Samarendra Pratap samarz...@gmail.com
wrote:
- We are calculating frequency of category ids in these top results. We
are not using facets because that gives count for all, relevant or
irrelevant, results.
- Based on category frequencies within top
Hi,
I understand that setting omitTermFreqAndPositions=true for a field in
schema.xml stores less information in the index with some restrictions e.g.
phrase search.
But does setting this property as true for a field which is of type
string, int or is analyzed by KeywordAnalyzer makes any
please reply.
Thanks
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Samarendra Pratap samarz...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Chris,
Thanks for you reply and sorry for delay. Please find my replies below in
the mail.
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 5:56 AM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.orgwrote:
: Till 3 days
Hi Chris,
Thanks for you reply and sorry for delay. Please find my replies below in
the mail.
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 5:56 AM, Chris Hostetter hossman_luc...@fucit.orgwrote:
: Till 3 days ago, we were running Solr 3.4 instance with following java
: command line options
: java -server
Hi everyone,
A couple of days back I encountered a weird problem of continuously
increasing memory consumption. I am not sure if this is a problem of java
or Solr (3.4).
Till 3 days ago, we were running Solr 3.4 instance with following java
command line options
java -server -*Xms2048m*
Hi,
I restarted solr server with minor configuration changes and I/O and load
on server increased a lot.
Details:-
Solr version: 3.4
Jetty version: 6.1
Index Size: 30 GB
Total document: 14.6 mn
Request / second :20 (in day time)
Last restart: 15 days ago
Open threads: 50 - 60 (at any moment)
A
Hi
Could there be any possibility of index being in unstable state when I
restarted the server?
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Samarendra Pratap samarz...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
I restarted solr server with minor configuration changes and I/O and load
on server increased a lot.
Details
Hi,
As per our business logic we have to show two products per company in our
results. Second product should also be displayed as a normal search result,
instead of more... (or +, expand) kind of nested results.
*Short description*: With *group.limit=2 *option I am not able to find the
exact
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 6:59 AM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.orgwrote:
: 1. omitTermFreqAndPositions is very straightforward but if I avoid
: positions I'll refuse to serve phrase queries. I had searched for this in
but do you really need phrase queries on your cat field? i
No solutions to the problem?
OK. I'll look for the changes in source code and if I succeed I'll share it
here for feedback.
Thanks
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Samarendra Pratap samarz...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Chris,
Thanks for the insight.
1. omitTermFreqAndPositions is very
Hi Chris,
Thanks for the insight.
1. omitTermFreqAndPositions is very straightforward but if I avoid
positions I'll refuse to serve phrase queries. I had searched for this in
past as well but I finally reached to the conclusion that there is no thing
like omitTermFreq (only). Perhaps because
Hi everyone!
We are working on Solr - 3.4.
In Short: If my query term matches more than one words I want it to be
considered as one match (in a particular field).
Details:
Our index has a multi-valued field category which contains possible
category names of the company. It is entered by the
Hi Pravesh, thanks for your reply but I am not asking about the omitNorms
(index time parameter) I am asking about how to consider multiple matches
of a term in a single field as one during query time.
Thanks
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 2:48 PM, pravesh suyalprav...@yahoo.com wrote:
Did you
Hi,
We are upgrading solr 1.4 (with collapsing patch solr-236) to solr 3.3. I
was looking for the required changes in query parameters (or parameter
names) if any.
One thing I know for sure is that collapse and its sub-options are now
known by group, but didn't find anything else.
Can someone
Hi we are planning to migrate from solr 1.4.1 to solr 3.3 and I am doing a
manual performance comparison.
We have setup two different solr installations (1.4.1 and 3.3) on different
ports.
1. Both have same index (old lucene format index) of around 20 GB with 10
million documents and 60 fields
15 matches
Mail list logo