d be using these acronyms at index time, not
> > search time. It will make your index bigger and you'll have to re-index
> > to add new synonyms (as they may apply to old documents) but this could
> > be an occasional task, and in the meantime you could use query-time
> >
ntaining 9000 synonyms in Solr's synonyms.txt file seems unweildy to me.
>
> Cheers
>
> Charlie
>
> On 15/01/2021 09:48, Shaun Campbell wrote:
> > I have a medical journals search application and I've a list of some
> 9,000
> > acronyms like this:
> >
hin the multiwords.
>
> As synonyms.txt:
> SRN, Stroke\ Research\ Network
> IGBP, isolated\ gastric\ bypass
> ...
>
> Redards
> Bernd
>
>
> Am 15.01.21 um 10:48 schrieb Shaun Campbell:
> > I have a medical journals search application and I've a list of some
I have a medical journals search application and I've a list of some 9,000
acronyms like this:
MSNQ=>MSNQ Multiple Sclerosis Neuropsychological Screening Questionnaire
SRN=>SRN Stroke Research Network
IGBP=>IGBP isolated gastric bypass
TOMADO=>TOMADO Trial of Oral Mandibular Advancement Devices fo
hting more is your goal right now it appears.
>
> ~ David Smiley
> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 2:45 PM Shaun Campbell
> wrote:
>
> > That's great David. So hl.maxAnalyzedChars isn&#x
n
On Tue, 12 Jan 2021 at 19:33, David Smiley wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 1:08 PM Shaun Campbell
> wrote:
>
> > Hi David
> >
> > Getting closer now.
> >
> > First of all, a bit of a mistake on my part. I have two cores set up and
> I
>
t the dedicated plugin info is only for
> the original and Fast Vector Highlighters.
>
> ~ David
>
>
> >
> > Thanks
> > Shaun
> >
> > On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 at 20:57, David Smiley wrote:
> >
> > > Hello!
> > >
> > > I worked
d
highlighting to each request?
Thanks
Shaun
On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 at 20:57, David Smiley wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I worked on the UnifiedHighlighter a lot and want to help you!
>
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 9:58 AM Shaun Campbell
> wrote:
>
> > I've been using highlighting
I've been using highlighting for a while, using the original highlighter,
and just come across a problem with fields that contain a large amount of
text, approx 250k characters. I only have about 2,000 records but each one
contains a journal publication to search through.
What I noticed is that so
Hi
Been using Solr on a project now for a couple of years and is working well.
It's just a simple index of about 20 - 25 fields and 7,000 project records.
Now there's a requirement to be able to search on the content of documents
(web pages, Word, pdf etc) related to those projects. My initial t
I would say it all depends on what you are trying to do. Unlike a
relational database, in Solr the data does not need to be normalised, you
need to put everything into an index so that you can achieve whatever
feature it is that you want. For example, you may search on customer and
want a facette
Hi Paul
Would a multi-core set up and the swap command do what you want it to do?
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CoreAdmin
Shaun
On 28 April 2011 12:49, Paul Libbrecht wrote:
>
> Hello list,
>
> I am planning to implement a setup, to be run on unix scripts, that should
> perform a full pull-and-
If it's of any help I've split the processing of PDF files from the
indexing. I put the PDF content into a text file (but I guess you could load
it into a database) and use that as part of the indexing. My processing of
the PDF files also compares timestamps on the document and the text file so
th
t is greater than 0, index otherwise.
>
> Prior to Solr1.4, one needed to use true instead of count and false instead
> of index.
>
> This parameter can be specified on a per field basis.
>
>
> -Pete
>
> On Apr 8, 2011, at 2:49 AM, Shaun Campbell wrote:
>
> > Pete
&g
Pete
Surely the default sort order for facets is by descending count order. See
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters. If your results are
really sorted in ascending order can't you sort them externally eg Java?
Hope that helps.
Shaun
Sorry, see what you mean about fixed-length (minGramSize==maxGramSize). I
see mine aren't.:(
On 9 December 2010 14:26, Koji Sekiguchi wrote:
> (10/12/09 22:50), Shaun Campbell wrote:
>
>> OK. I'd switch to FastVectorHighlighter which cured the exceptions and
>> g
OK. I'd switch to FastVectorHighlighter which cured the exceptions and gives
me highlighting so I assumed that you could use this instead of the standard
highlighter on n-grammed fields. I guess my query was how does the
highlighter now highlight synonym terms?
Thanks
Shaun
> As I said in my pr
ative assets
As you can see asset works well. For the "synonyms" does it just highlight
the first n characters where n is the length of the input string? Can't
figure out how it could do otherwise.
Shaun
On 9 December 2010 12:51, Koji Sekiguchi wrote:
> (10/12/09 21:22
I'm trying to highlight a field and I'm getting an exception thrown, only on
certain search terms though. I am fairly certain that the cause of the
problem is through having synonyms on the highlighted field as I have had
highlighting working in the past on other fields.
The added complication is
Hi
I've switched my app to now use an EmbeddedSolrServer. I'm doing an
index on my rebuild core and swapping cores at the end.
Unfortunately, without restarting my web app I can't see the newly
indexed data. I can see core swapping is working, and I can see the
data after indexing without restar
I've got a Solr multi core system and I'm trying to swap the cores
after a re-index via SolrJ using a separate HTTP Solr web server. My
application seems to be generating a URL that's not valid for my Solr
Tomcat installation but I can't see why or where it's getting its data
from.
Core swapping
I've got an existing Spring Solr SolrJ application that indexes a mixture of
documents. It seems to have been working fine now for a couple of weeks but
today I've just started getting an exception when processing a certain pdf
file.
The exception is :
ERROR: org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore - org.
Hi Mitch
Thanks for responding. Not actually sure what you wanted from
CoreAdminResponse but I put the following in:
CoreAdminRequest car = new CoreAdminRequest();
car.setCoreName("live");
car.setOtherCoreName("rebuild");
car.setAction(CoreAdminPar
I've got Solr set up now with two cores which I call live and rebuild and
which point to core0 and core1 directories respectively. My solr.xml file
contains:
In my Spring MVC application I have Solr set up as an embedded server and
have two singleton beans which I use to refer to
I have a query regarding multi core schema files which I can't find the
answer to. In a multi core set up does each core need it's own schema
file? I have two cores with their own schema files, which are a straight
copy of each other, and I just wanted to maintain one schema file. I see
there's
't need to add anything with SolrQuery.
>
> URL url = new URL(new URL(solrBaseUrl), coreName);
> CommonsHttpSolrServer server = new CommonsHttpSolrServer(url);
>
> Concerning the "default" core thing - I wouldn't know about that.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Chantal
>
I'm writing a client using SolrJ and was wondering how to handle a multi
core installation. We want to use the facility to rebuild the index on one
of the cores at a scheduled time and then use the SWAP facility to switch
the "live" core to the newly rebuilt core. I think I can do the SWAP with
C
27 matches
Mail list logo
