I have also wanted to use the very cool DisMax query handler but was
dismayed that it prevented me from using Solr/Lucene's full syntax
capability. So I took matters into my own hands and modified the source. I
have patches available:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-756 757 and 758
I think the point is that Viaj would like to permit users to specify the
field if they so choose.
On 9/11/08 12:48 PM, Chris Hostetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: b) q=field1:xyz+xyzqt=dismax it returns me zero result.
:
: Is there anyway I get results for the query type b but still use the
, David W. (DSMILEY) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have also wanted to use the very cool DisMax query handler but was
dismayed that it prevented me from using Solr/Lucene's full syntax
capability. So I took matters into my own hands and modified the source. I
have patches available:
https
You can modify the schema file but you'll need to reload Solr for Solr to
see be aware of it. You can use multiCore to eliminate downtime. But at
this point you obviously don't have any data in it so I can only assume
you'll want to reload everything -- what else would you expect? This
doesn't
Yes.
On 8/5/08 4:58 PM, Ian Connor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
When you store a multivaluefield in a given order
['one','two','three','four'], will it always return the values in that
order?
I have done so with some hacking but Solr doesn't support this natively. If
you did a mailing list search, you may of turned up this:
http://www.nabble.com/Standard-vs.-DisMaxQueryHandler-td6421205.html#a169458
50
I'm presently trying to get permission from my employer to release my
