, or opens them rarely, perhaps
that cost is a good tradeoff to get faster joins.
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:10 AM, anand chandak
anand.chan...@oracle.com wrote:
Re-posting...
Thanks,
Anand
On 2/12/2014 10:55 AM, anand chandak wrote:
Thanks David
Re-posting...
Thanks,
Anand
On 2/12/2014 10:55 AM, anand chandak wrote:
Thanks David, really helpful response.
You mentioned that if we have to add scoring support in solr then a
possible approach would be to add a custom QueryParser, which might be
taking Lucene's JOIN module. I have
might write a Solr
SearchComponent that adds fields from the from side. That could be tricky
to do; it would probably need to re-run the from-side query but filtered to
the matching top-N documents being returned.
~ David
anand chandak wrote
Resending, if somebody can please respond.
Thanks
Thanks Mikhail, curious why was scoring left out of solr ? And if
there's any plan to port it ?
Also, if you can please elaborate on the segmented vs toplevel
Thanks,
Anand
On 2/7/2014 4:53 PM, Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
Basically, i am trying to understand where and how solr joins differ
Hi
Why doesn't the solr join query doesn't return the score when returning
the response. Although I see JoinScorer in the JoinQParserPlugin class ?
Also, to evaluate the join performance, I filed a join query aganist
solr's join - JoinQParserPlugin and aganist lucene
Resending, if somebody can please respond.
Thanks,
Anand
On 2/5/2014 6:26 PM, anand chandak wrote:
Hi,
Having a question on join score, why doesn't the solr join query return
the scores. Looking at the code, I see there's JoinScorer defined in
the JoinQParserPlugin class ? If its
Re-posting, just in case if this one fell through crack.
Thanks,
Anand
On 2/1/2014 12:48 PM, anand chandak wrote:
Folks, have a basic question regarding solr join, the wiki,
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Join states : -
Fields or other properties of the documents being joined from
Folks, have a basic question regarding solr join, the wiki,
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Join states : -
Fields or other properties of the documents being joined from are not
available for use in processing of the resulting set of to documents
(ie: you can not return fields in the from
Hi,
I am trying to find whether the lucene joins (not solr join) if they are
using any filter cache. The API that lucene uses is for joining
joinutil.createjoinquery(), where can I find the source code for this API.
Thanks in advance
Thanks,
Anand
Folks, any response to below query would be highly appreciated
Thanks,
Anand
On 1/10/2014 11:04 AM, anand chandak wrote:
Hi,
I am testing replication feature of solr 4.x with large index,
unfortunately, that index that we had was 3.x format. So to conver
that into 4.x I copied (file
/UsingMailingLists
Best,
Erick
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 6:59 AM, anand chandak anand.chan...@oracle.com wrote:
Folks, any response to below query would be highly appreciated
Thanks,
Anand
On 1/10/2014 11:04 AM, anand chandak wrote:
Hi,
I am testing replication feature of solr 4.x
Hi,
I am testing replication feature of solr 4.x with large index,
unfortunately, that index that we had was for 3.x format. So I copied
the index file and ran the upgrade index utility to convert it to 4.x
format. The utility did, what it is suppose to do and I 4.x index
(verified it with
Hi,
We are using solr 4.4 version and am facing some issue with replication,
we are trying to replicate very large index about 105G. Once the
replication is done, I see the index.timestamp directory but the index
directory is not present ? Why is this happening ?
Also, I see with every
Folks, would really appreciate if somebody can help/throw some light on
below issue . This issue is blocking our upgrade, we are doing a 3.x to
4.x upgrade and indexing around 100g of data.
Any help would be highly appreciated.
Thanks,
Anand
On 1/3/2014 11:46 AM, anand chandak wrote
the replica can't download
them.
So its an error, but something the system can recover from, since it will
re-recover, which should pick up a (larger) segment next time, which is
less likely to be removed whilst recovery is going on.
On 3 January 2014 05:32, anand chandak anand.chan...@oracle.com
Hi,
I am hitting this error on replication, can somebody please tell me
what's wrong here and what can be done to correct this error :
[explicit-fetchindex-cmd] ERROR
org.apache.solr.handler.ReplicationHandler- SnapPull failed
:org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Unable to download
, anand chandak anand.chan...@oracle.com wrote:
Quick question about solr replication : What happens if there's a
replication running for very large index that runs more than the interval
for 2 replication ? would the automatic runs of replication interfere with
the current running one or it would
Quick question about solr replication : What happens if there's a
replication running for very large index that runs more than the
interval for 2 replication ? would the automatic runs of replication
interfere with the current running one or it would not even spawn next
iteration of
Hi,
I am running into below errors when running checkindex utility :
/java -cp
/apps/search/tomcat/webapps/solr/WEB-INF/lib/lucene-core-4.4.0.jar
org.apache.lucene.index.CheckIndex .//
//
//NOTE: testing will be more thorough if you run java with
'-ea:org.apache.lucene...', so assertions
19 matches
Mail list logo