Re: Upgrade SOLR version - facets perfomance regression

Are you using docvalues ? Try that it might help. Bill Bell Sent from mobile > On Jan 26, 2017, at 10:38 AM, Bhawna Asnani wrote: > > Hi, > I am experiencing a similar issue. We have tried method uif but that didn't > help much. There is still some performance

Re: Joining Across Collections

Great question Bill Bell Sent from mobile > On Jan 18, 2017, at 1:32 AM, nabil Kouici wrote: > > Hi All, > I'm using join across collection feature to do an inner join between 2 > collections. It works fine. > Is it possible to use this feature to compare between

Re: AW: FacetField-Result on String-Field contains value with count 0?

Set mincount to 1 Bill Bell Sent from mobile > On Jan 13, 2017, at 7:19 AM, Sebastian Riemer wrote: > > Pardon me, > the second search should have been this: > http://localhost:8983/solr/wemi/select?fq=m_mediaType_s:%221%22=on=*:*=0=0=json > > (or in other words, give

Re: SolrCloud and LVM

Yeah we normally take the number of GB on a machine for the index size on disk and then double it for memory... For example we have 28gb on disk and we see great perf at 64gb ram. If you can do that you will probably get good results. Remember to not give Java much memory. We set it at 12gb.

Available

I am available for consulting projects if your project needs help. Been doing Solr work for 6 years... Bill Bell Sent from mobile

Re: Question about Lucene FieldCache

Try disabling and perf may get better Bill Bell Sent from mobile > On Jan 9, 2017, at 6:41 AM, Yago Riveiro wrote: > > The documentation says that the only caches configurable are: > > - filterCache > - queryResultCache > - documentCache > - user defined caches > >

Re: Help needed in breaking large index file into smaller ones

Can you set Solr config segments to a higher number, don't optimize and you will get smaller files after a new index is created. Can you reindex ? Bill Bell Sent from mobile > On Jan 9, 2017, at 7:15 AM, Narsimha Reddy CHALLA > wrote: > > No, it does not work by

Re: Solr 6 Default Core URL

Yes with Nginx in front of it Bill Bell Sent from mobile > On Dec 13, 2016, at 2:54 PM, Max Bridgewater > wrote: > > I have one Solr core on my solr 6 instance and I can query it with: > > http://localhost:8983/solr/mycore/search?q=*:* > > Is there a way to

Re: Memory leak in Solr

What tool is that ? The stats I would like to run on my Solr instance Bill Bell Sent from mobile > On Dec 2, 2016, at 4:49 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote: > >> On 12/2/2016 12:01 PM, S G wrote: >> This post shows some stats on Solr which indicate that there might be a >> memory

Re: How to implement a custom boost function

You can pahinaye and sort as long as it is the same each time. Sort can be a function value too. I.e. Sort=geodist() asc... bq can also boost based on a field name Bill Bell Sent from mobile > On Oct 3, 2016, at 11:28 PM, Lucas Cotta wrote: > > Hi Walter,

Re: Miserable Experience Using Solr. Again.

Interested for sure Bill Bell Sent from mobile > On Sep 12, 2016, at 4:05 PM, John Bickerstaff > wrote: > > For what it's worth - I found enough frustration upgrading that I decided > to "upgrade by replacement" > > Now, I suppose if you've got a huge dataset to

Re: Cache problem

You do need to optimize to get rid of the deleted docs probably... That is a lot of deleted docs Bill Bell Sent from mobile > On Apr 11, 2016, at 7:39 AM, Bastien Latard - MDPI AG > wrote: > > Dear Solr experts :), > > I read this very interesting post

Re: Soft commit does not affecting query performance

Why do you think it would ? Bill Bell Sent from mobile > On Apr 11, 2016, at 7:48 AM, Bhaumik Joshi wrote: > > Hi All, > > We are doing query performance test with different soft commit intervals. In > the test with 1sec of soft commit interval and 1min of soft commit

Re: Sorting question

Put the match into 2 separate fields and index it. Then sort in Solr by the 2 fields is one way Bill Bell Sent from mobile > On Apr 1, 2016, at 11:15 AM, John Bickerstaff > wrote: > > Just to be clear - I don't mean who requests the list (application or user) > I

Re: Solrcloud for Java 1.6

Run it on 2 separate boxes Bill Bell Sent from mobile > On Jan 7, 2016, at 3:11 PM, Aswath Srinivasan (TMS) > wrote: > > Hi fellow developers, > > I have a situation where the search front-end application is using java 1.6. > Upgrading Java version is out of

Re: Issue with if() statement

Solr 5.3.1 Bill Bell Sent from mobile > On Dec 31, 2015, at 4:50 PM, William Bell wrote: > > We are getting weird results with if(exists(a),b,c). We are getting b+c!! > >

Re: fl=value equals?

fl=$b tells me it works. Or I can do a sort=$b asc The idea is to calculate a score but only include geo if it is not a national search. Do we want to send in a parameter into the QT which allows us to omit geo from national searches Bill Bell Sent from mobile > On Nov 11, 2015, at 1:15

Re: Different ports for search and upload request

Scary stuff If you did that you better reload the core Bill Bell Sent from mobile > On Sep 24, 2015, at 5:05 PM, Siddhartha Singh Sandhu > wrote: > > Thank you so much. > > Safe to ignore the following(not a query):- > > *Never did this. *But how about this crazy

Re: faceting is unusable slow since upgrade to 5.3.0

Can we add it back with a parameter at least ? Bill Bell Sent from mobile > On Sep 24, 2015, at 8:58 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > >> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 8:09 AM, Uwe Reh wrote: >> our bibliographic index (~20M entries) runs fine with Solr

Re: Dismax and StandardTokenizer: OR queries despite mm=100%

Use fq Bill Bell Sent from mobile > On Sep 23, 2015, at 1:00 PM, Andreas Hubold > wrote: > > Hi, > > we're using Solr 4.10.4 and the dismax query parser to search across multiple > fields. One of the fields is configured with a StandardTokenizer (type >

Easier way to do this?

I would love for the SOLR spatial 4 to support pt so that I can run # of results around a central point easily like in 3.6. How can I pass parameters to a Circle() ? I would love to send PT to this query since the pt is the same across multiple areas For example:

Support old syntax including geodist

Since Spatial Lucene 4 does not seem to support geodist(), even sending d,pt,fq={!geofilt}does not help me = I need to sort. So I end up having to set up the sortsq. Any other ideas on how to support the old syntax on the new spatial? Can I create a transform or something ? Convert

Re: recommended SSD

Ssd does not always improve performance of Solr. We tried several SSD and we saw an improvement of only a few percentages in query qtime, etc... It is definitely not always a slam dunk -- View this message in context:

Re: recommended SSD

Ssd does not always improve performance of Solr. We tried several SSD and we saw an improvement of only a few percentages in query qtime, etc... It is definitely not always a slam dunk -- View this message in context: