Hi, I'm using solr 1.4. It seems that I can only do queries from the web
interface. To post and delete, I'd have to drop to command line using
the post script or command line or write some code. It'd be really great
if the web interface could be extended and add a form to take XML content
for
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrTomcat (near the bottom), I recently
experienced problems with glassfish and switched to post to solve it
(http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrGlassfish)
Tim
-Original Message-
From: jlist9 [mailto:jli...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 2:33 PM
I was using SolrQuery. Now I'm switching to QueryRequest.
Hope this works. Thanks!
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 11:26 PM, jlist9 jli...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you for the reply! I'm using Tomcat 6.0.20. I read the page.
I think you meant setting URIEncoding for the connector:
Connector
Ah, I didn't know this. This should be much simpler. Thank you very much!
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 12:57 AM, Ahmet Arslan iori...@yahoo.com wrote:
Meanwhile, I'd like to try using POST, but I didn't find
information
about how to do this. Could someone point me to a link to
some
sample code?
Hi, I'm having a problem with Unicode queries using solrj.
I have an index with unicode strings. From /solr/admin web interface,
I can find results using the Java unicode format, such as \u751f\u6d3b.
(If I just type in a UTF-8 string, I can't find any result though. Not
sure why.)
But in solrj,
That's it. Thank you!
I thought mlt was available by default. I was wrong.
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 8:22 AM, Ahmet Arslan iori...@yahoo.com wrote:
I have some experience using MLT with
the StandardRequestHandler with Python
but I can't figure out how to do it with solrj. It seems
that to do
I see. It's still a little confusing to me but I'm fine as long as
this is the expected behavior. I also tried the example index
with data that come with the solr distribution and observe the
same behavior - only String fields are displayed. So Lucene is
sharing _some_ types with Solr but not all.
Thank you Chris. I'm clear now. I'll give Luke's latest version a try
when it's out.
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
: I see. It's still a little confusing to me but I'm fine as long as
: this is the expected behavior. I also tried the example
I have some experience using MLT with the StandardRequestHandler with Python
but I can't figure out how to do it with solrj. It seems that to do
MLT with solrj I have
to use MoreLikeThisRequestHandler and there seems no way to use
StandardRequestHandler for MLT with solrj (please correct me if I'm
provided you the information
you've provided us. What could you say?
I might give it a try and see the same thing :-D
Thanks
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 2:19 PM, jlist9 jli...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh, here's a modified/improved version of what I described in my first
email:
1. Queries like id:123 which
Thanks for the suggestion. I tried 0.9.9.1 but saw the same problem.
I didn't see 0.9.9 on their download page.
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 2:39 AM, Ahmet Arslan iori...@yahoo.com wrote:
Solr 1.4
You haven't identified the version of Luke you're
using.
Luke 1.0.1 (2010-04-01)
I think with
The id field has type long in schema.xml. In Luke, they are shown
as hex dump. When viewing a doc (returned by *:*), I pick the ID field
and press the Show button, Luke pops up a dialog that allows me
to change the Show Content As value. When I choose Number,
I get an error message:
Some values
with the definitions in SOLR?
HTH
Erick
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 10:55 PM, jlist9 jli...@gmail.com wrote:
I tried the stand-alone Luke tool (not Luke request handler) to browse
a solr index and find a few strange things:
1. Queries like id:123 which work fine in /solr/admin web interface
returns
The JVM arg seems to overwrite that just fine:
-Dsolr.data.dir=/opt/solr/example/data
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 12:14 AM, Abdelhamid ABID aeh.a...@gmail.com wrote:
.. and to unset dataDir just leave it blank
dataDir${solr.data.dir:}/dataDir
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 12:15 AM, Chris Hostetter
...@gmail.com wrote:
Then you have to provide a lot more detail about what you did
and what you're seeing and what you think you should see. You
might review this page:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UsingMailingLists
Best
Erick
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 1:41 PM, jlist9 jli...@gmail.com wrote:
I find
My solr index works fine with the embedded Jetty. I'm trying to move the
index to Tomcat. Following the wiki page http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrTomcat,
I put this line in setenv.bat:
set JAVA_OPTS=%JAVA_OPTS% -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8
-Dsolr.solr.home=D:\opt\solr\example
Tomcat seems to be picking
29, 2010 at 1:48 PM, jlist9 jli...@gmail.com wrote:
My solr index works fine with the embedded Jetty. I'm trying to move the
index to Tomcat. Following the wiki page
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrTomcat,
I put this line in setenv.bat:
set JAVA_OPTS=%JAVA_OPTS% -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8
://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrConfigXml#dataDir_parameter
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 9:48 PM, jlist9 jli...@gmail.com wrote:
My solr index works fine with the embedded Jetty. I'm trying to move the
index to Tomcat. Following the wiki page
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrTomcat,
I put this line in setenv.bat
You are right. Thanks Chris!
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
: Most likely you have missed to point data directory in solrconf.xml,
: this should help :
: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrConfigXml#dataDir_parameter
right .. double check what
I tried the stand-alone Luke tool (not Luke request handler) to browse
a solr index and find a few strange things:
1. Queries like id:123 which work fine in /solr/admin web interface
returns nothing in Luke. *:* returns everything fine in Luke.
2. When Luke displays records with query *:*, it
So my question is, Is MoreLikeThis with StandardRequestHandler
supported on shards? If not, is MoreLikeThisHandler supported?
No, MoreLikeThis does not work with distributed search currently.
There is an issue open with a couple of patches though.
See
Hi,
I tried MoreLikeThis (StandardRequestHandler with mlt arguments)
with a single solr server and it works fine. However, when I tried
the same query with sharded servers, I don't get the moreLikeThis
key in the results.
So my question is, Is MoreLikeThis with StandardRequestHandler
supported
Thanks. That explains it! I'll set termVector to true and give it a try again.
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 7:41 AM, Koji Sekiguchi k...@r.email.ne.jp wrote:
MLT uses termVector if it exists for the field. If termVector is not
available,
MLT tries to get stored field data. If stored field is not
Hi, I'm trying out the mlt handler but I'm getting a 404 error.
HTTP Status 404 - /solr/mlt
solrconfig.xml seem to say that mlt handler is available by default.
i wonder if there's anything else I should do before I can use it?
I'm using version 1.3.
Thanks
The wiki page (http://wiki.apache.org/solr/MoreLikeThis) says:
mlt.fl: The fields to use for similarity. NOTE: if possible, these
should have a stored TermVector
I didn't set TermVector to true MoreLikeThis with StandardRequestHandler seems
to work fine. The first question is, is TermVector only
Thanks. Will that still be the MoreLikeThisRequestHandler?
Or the StandardRequestHandler with mlt option?
Hi, I'm trying out the mlt handler but I'm getting a 404 error.
HTTP Status 404 - /solr/mlt
solrconfig.xml seem to say that mlt handler is available by default.
i wonder if there's
I've never paid attention to post/commit ration. I usually do a commit
after maybe 100 posts. Is there a guideline about this? Thanks.
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Otis Gospodnetic
otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com wrote:
2) ramBufferSizeMB dictates, more or less, how much Lucene/Solr will consume
Hi. I'm using the StandardRequestHandler for MoreLikeThis queries.
I find that although I can specify how many results I want returned
with mlt.count, it seesm like I can not specify a start location
so that I can paginate the results. Is this the case?
Thanks
I see. Thanks.
There was a thread about this last week and verdict is currently you
can't highlight MoreLikeThis results.
Thanks,
Matt Weber
My query returns a number of MoreLikeThis results for a given
document. I wonder if there is a way to highlight the terms
in the MoreLikeThis
I have an index of about 6 million small documents.
I find that after a few days of on and off posting, searching
still works fine but posting gets really slow - client http
connection always times out. I restarted server. Then posting
speed seemed to have returned to normal. Is this the expected
I'm using the embedded Jetty.
I have an index of about 6 million small documents.
I find that after a few days of on and off posting, searching
still works fine but posting gets really slow - client http
connection always times out. I restarted server. Then posting
speed seemed to have
Hi, I have a question about what MoreLikeThis means - I suppose
it means get more documents that are similar to _this_ document.
So I expect the query always take a known document as argument.
I wonder how I should interpret this query:
Is it a bad idea to embed my webapp in solr jetty? Or is it always
better to use a separate web server if I'm serving the result from a
web server?
Thanks
I haven't tried this but is it possible to store fields that are not
defined in solr schema and retrieve them in the result?
I understand there could be conflicts in terms of how each document
understand/defines these fields but since these fields are not
defined, and thus not index, it should
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
From: jlist9 jli...@gmail.com
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, March 8, 2009 2:33:03 PM
Subject: Store fields that are not defined in schema?
I haven't tried this but is it possible to store fields
is the cleaner way to go.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
From: jlist9 jli...@gmail.com
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, March 8, 2009 2:59:50 PM
Subject: Re: Store fields that are not defined in schema?
Thanks Otis
I used it with 1.2 but had some unicode issues. Anyone else has had
issues with unicode?
Or maybe the issues have been addressed ?
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 7:04 PM, Ed Summers e...@pobox.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 4:53 AM, Mark Jarecki mjare...@bigpond.net.au wrote:
I was just wondering
37 matches
Mail list logo
