Hi,
I'm puzzled by this issue and was wondering if anyone knows why. Basically
I am trying to get hit counts from my solr.log.* files for analysis purpose.
However, I noticed that sometimes for a request I don't get a hits=xyz
shown.
Here are 2 example log snippets from my
Update: from my further investigation, it appears that anytime I am using the
collapse field feature (I am running collapse field patch on 1.4), then the
hits= count is not shown in the log. Anyone can confirm?
michael8 wrote:
Hi,
I'm puzzled by this issue and was wondering if anyone knows
I'm currently using Solr 1.4 with its built-in solr.ReplicationHandler
enabled in solrconfig.xml for a master and slave as follows:
requestHandler name=/replication class=solr.ReplicationHandler
lst name=master
str name=enable${enable.master:false}/str
str
then an ArrayList of
integers. I think that this will only be a real problem when the
collapse groups become very large.
I hope this will answer your question.
Martijn
2009/11/14 michael8 mich...@saracatech.com:
Hi,
This almost seems like a bug, but I can't be sure so I'm seeking
Hi,
This almost seems like a bug, but I can't be sure so I'm seeking
confirmation. Basically I am building a site that presents search results
in reverse chronologically order. I am also leveraging the field collapse
feature so that I can group results using 'adjacent' mode and have solr
size.
see q.alt
Alex
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 12:59 AM, michael8 wrote:
Sounds like a nice approach you have done. BTW, I have not used
DisMax
handler yet, but does it handle *:* properly? IOW, do you care if
users
issue this query, or does DisMax treat this query string
Hi Julian,
Saw you post on exactly the question I have. I'm curious if you got any
response directly, or figured out a way to do this by now that you could
share? I'm in the same situation trying to 'sanitize' the query string
coming in before handing it to solr. I do see that characters like
original query to DisMax request handler.
Alex
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 10:05 PM, michael8 mich...@saracatech.com wrote:
Hi Julian,
Saw you post on exactly the question I have. I'm curious if you got any
response directly, or figured out a way to do this by now that you could
share? I'm
michael8 mich...@saracatech.com:
Hi,
I would like to confirm if 'adjacent' in collapse.type means the
documents
(with the same collapse field value) are considered adjacent *after* the
'sort' param from the query has been applied, or *before*? I would think
it
would be *after* since
the --revision switch in svn, patch
away, and then svn up to make sure everything merges cleanly. This is a
good guide to follow as well:
http://www.mail-archive.com/solr-user@lucene.apache.org/msg10189.html
cheers,
-mike
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 3:55 PM, michael8 mich...@saracatech.com wrote
)
Unless there is a better way, it seems like I would need to do svn up
--revision ... for each of the files to be patched and then apply the
patch? This seems error prone and tedious. Am I missing something simpler
here?
Michael
michael8 wrote:
Perfect. This is what I need to know instead
Hi,
I would like to confirm if 'adjacent' in collapse.type means the documents
(with the same collapse field value) are considered adjacent *after* the
'sort' param from the query has been applied, or *before*? I would think it
would be *after* since collapse feature primarily is meant for
Hi,
First I like to pardon my novice question on patching solr (1.4). What I
like to know is, given a patch, like the one for collapse field, how would
one go about knowing what solr source that patch is meant for since this is
a source level patch? Wouldn't the exact versions of a set of java
Hi,
First I like to pardon my novice question on patching solr (1.4). What I
like to know is, given a patch, like the one for collapse field, how would
one go about knowing what solr source that patch is meant for since this is
a source level patch? Wouldn't the exact versions of a set of java
:
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 1:42 AM, michael8 mich...@saracatech.com wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone know when exactly is the dih.last_index_time in
dataimport.properties captured? E.g. start of issueing SQL to data
source,
end of executing SQL to data source to fetch the list of IDs that have
changed
That's perfect. Reimporting and reindexing some redundantly because of the
slight time overlap is worth the risk of losing docs. Thanks Shalin.
Michael
Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 9:46 PM, michael8 mich...@saracatech.com wrote:
Thanks for your clarification
Thanks Shalin. Patch works well for me too.
Michael
Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 1:38 AM, michael8 mich...@saracatech.com wrote:
2 things I noticed that are different from 1.3 to 1.4 for DataImport:
1. there are now 2 datetime values (per my specific schema I'm
Hi,
Does anyone know when exactly is the dih.last_index_time in
dataimport.properties captured? E.g. start of issueing SQL to data source,
end of executing SQL to data source to fetch the list of IDs that have
changed since last index, end of indexing all changed/new documents? The
name seems
format to use.
Michael
Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ्-2 wrote:
really?
I don't remember that being changed.
what difference do u notice?
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 2:30 AM, michael8 mich...@saracatech.com wrote:
Just looking for confirmation from others, but it appears that the
formatting
Just looking for confirmation from others, but it appears that the formatting
of last_index_time from dataimport.properties (using DataImportHandler) is
different in 1.4 vs. that in 1.3. I was troubleshooting why delta imports
are no longer working for me after moving over to solr 1.4 (10/2
markrmiller wrote:
michael8 wrote:
markrmiller wrote:
michael8 wrote:
Hi,
I know Solr 1.4 is going to be released any day now pending Lucene 2.9
release. Is there anywhere where one can download a pre-released
nighly
build of Solr 1.4 just for getting familiar with new
markrmiller wrote:
michael8 wrote:
Hi,
I know Solr 1.4 is going to be released any day now pending Lucene 2.9
release. Is there anywhere where one can download a pre-released nighly
build of Solr 1.4 just for getting familiar with new features (e.g. field
collapsing)?
Thanks
Hi,
I know Solr 1.4 is going to be released any day now pending Lucene 2.9
release. Is there anywhere where one can download a pre-released nighly
build of Solr 1.4 just for getting familiar with new features (e.g. field
collapsing)?
Thanks,
Michael
--
View this message in context:
Hi,
I have this situation that I believe is very common but was curious if
anyone knows the right way to go about solving it.
I have a document with 'ALMA awards' in it. However, when user searches for
'aLMA awards', it ends up with no results found. However, when I search for
'alma awards'
in the example directory
(.../example/solr/conf/) for examples on how to set up the spellcheck
component, and on how the request handlers are configured.
-Jay
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 3:04 PM, michael8 mich...@saracatech.com wrote:
Hi,
I have a newbie question
Hi,
I have a newbie question about the 'standard' requestHandler in
solrconfig.xml. What I like to know is where is the config information for
this requestHandler kept? When I go to http://localhost:8983/solr/admin, I
see the following info, but am curious where are the supposedly 'chained'
26 matches
Mail list logo
