I've been hearing more and more about ElasticSearch. Can anyone give me a
rough overview on how these two technologies differ. What are the
strengths/weaknesses of each. Why would one choose one of the other?
Thanks
--
Regards / Med vennlig hilsen
Tarjei Huse
Mobil: 920 63 413
expect
errors to occur.
I understood the error when I saw it, but I think the version dependency
should be noted in the SolrJ manual.
Regards,
T
Martijn
On 25 July 2011 12:15, Tarjei Huse tar...@scanmine.com wrote:
Hi, I recently went through a little hell when I upgraded my Solr
servers
Any comments with regard to this?
Are all SolrJ methods dependent on Java Serialization and thus class
versions?
--
Regards / Med vennlig hilsen
Tarjei Huse
Mobil: 920 63 413
.
Kind regards,
Tarjei
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 6:21 AM, Jakob Vad Nielsen
jakobvadniel...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to create some integrations tests within my project using JUnit
and the SolrTestCaseJ4 (from Solr-test-framework 3.2.0) helper class. The
problem is that I'm getting
On 02/25/2011 03:02 PM, Koji Sekiguchi wrote:
(11/02/25 18:30), Tarjei Huse wrote:
Hi,
On 02/25/2011 02:06 AM, Koji Sekiguchi wrote:
(11/02/24 20:18), Tarjei Huse wrote:
Hi,
I got an index where I have two fields, body and caseInsensitiveBody.
Body is indexed and stored while
Hi,
On 02/25/2011 02:06 AM, Koji Sekiguchi wrote:
(11/02/24 20:18), Tarjei Huse wrote:
Hi,
I got an index where I have two fields, body and caseInsensitiveBody.
Body is indexed and stored while caseInsensitiveBody is just indexed.
The idea is that by not storing the caseInsensitiveBody I
vennlig hilsen
Tarjei Huse
, ORDER.desc); // sorter på dato
return server.query(query);
}
--
Regards / Med vennlig hilsen
Tarjei Huse
Mobil: 920 63 413
in a separate field
but with random ordering, would that be ok?
Tarjei
* That is, before indexing an article, split it into sentences. Then index
the
article in the main index, and index+store each sentence in the secondary
index. So for each doc in the main index there will be multiple docs
on disk in insertion order.
This would make it possible for me to save a sorting step by not sorting
by a specific field, but by insertion time in reverse.
AFAIK Lucene knows how to do this, but which request parameters should I
use in Solr?
Kind regards,
Tarjei
--
Tarjei Huse
Mobil: 920 63
Hi, I just thought I'd note that upgrading to the 1.4 nightlies solved
my problem.
kind regards,
Tarjei
On 06/17/2009 02:38 PM, tarjei wrote:
Hi, I'm having memory problems on one of my Solr slaves:
SEVERE: Error during auto-warming of
key:org.apache.solr.search.queryresult...@563c7832
on that.
Any other tips would also be welcome. If I do not come up with anything
else - more RAM will be issued...
Kind regards,
Tarjei
1995-12-31
So that all documents with the same date will then be sorted by relevance or whatever you
specify as the next criteria in the sort parameter.
Thanks, this happens at indexing time?
kind regards,
Tarjei
Hi, I got a set of entries where I want to sort them both by the day
they were entered into solr(stored as a Solr date) and also by another
field.
Is this possible or do I have to create a separate field with lower
resolution?
kind regards,
Tarjei
if I
want to say Sort so that withing entries for Nov. 2 , you sort by
relevance for example?
Kind regards,
Tarjei
-
Markus Jelsma Buyways B.V. Tel. 050-3118123
Technisch ArchitectFriesestraatweg 215c Fax. 050-3118124
http://www.buyways.nl
this is a useful addition
as it shows how to use/code some of the more advanced features in Solr.
Also, it is a quick way to prototype solr.
Regards,
Tarjei
Thanks,
Lars
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
16 matches
Mail list logo
