That's excellent Mikhail !
Thanks so much.
I have to use it in my custom query parser now.
Ludovic.
-
Jouve
France.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/AND-operator-in-multi-valued-fields-tp4159715p4160668.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 12:45 PM, lboutros wrote:
> What do you think about developing a new SpanQuery class that allows "cross
> field" queries ?
>
indeed
http://lucene.apache.org/core/3_0_3/api/all/org/apache/lucene/search/spans/FieldMaskingSpanQuery.html
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
query parser.
>
> Thx a lot Alex,
>
> Ludovic.
>
>
>
> -
> Jouve
> France.
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/AND-operator-in-multi-valued-fields-tp4159715p4159942.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ts
of different blocks and operators ;)
Now I have to use this query in my custom query parser.
Thx a lot Alex,
Ludovic.
-
Jouve
France.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/AND-operator-in-multi-valued-fields-tp4159715p4159942.html
Sent from the Solr - Us
> Ludovic
>
>
>
>
> -----
> Jouve
> France.
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/AND-operator-in-multi-valued-fields-tp4159715p4159883.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
proposal :
What do you think about developing a new SpanQuery class that allows "cross
field" queries ?
Ludovic
-
Jouve
France.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/AND-operator-in-multi-valued-fields-tp4159715p4159883.html
Sent from the Solr - User ma
one unique
> field.
>
> Do you think this could be a better/easier approach ?
>
> Ludovic
>
>
>
> -
> Jouve
> France.
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/AND-operator-in-multi-valued-fields-tp4159715p4159797.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
d to index dates, ids and text in one unique
field.
Do you think this could be a better/easier approach ?
Ludovic
-
Jouve
France.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/AND-operator-in-multi-valued-fields-tp4159715p4159797.html
Sent from the Solr - User ma
alue with 1st value (like positional
>> constraints?).
>
> That's exactly what I would like to do. :)
>
>
>
>
> -
> Jouve
> France.
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/AND-operator-in-multi-valued-fields-tp41597
Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote
> Are you saying you want to match 1st value with 1st value (like positional
> constraints?).
That's exactly what I would like to do. :)
-
Jouve
France.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/AND-operator-in-multi-va
ay to do that ?
>
> Ludovic.
>
>
>
> -
> Jouve
> France.
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/AND-operator-in-multi-valued-fields-tp4159715.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Jouve
France.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/AND-operator-in-multi-valued-fields-tp4159715.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
12 matches
Mail list logo