);
} catch (ExecutionException e) {
SolrException.log(log,e);
}
}
}
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Autocommit-blocking-adds---AutoCommit-Speedup--tp23435224p23457422.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-adds---AutoCommit-Speedup--tp23435224p23587440.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
);
}
}
}
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Autocommit-blocking-adds---AutoCommit-Speedup--tp2
3435224p23457422.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-Original Message-
From: jayson.minard [mailto:jayson.min...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 09, 2009 10:45 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Autocommit blocking adds? AutoCommit Speedup?
First cut of updated handler now in:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR
of the memory consumption by this queue if commit takes
much longer to complete.
Thanks,
Siddharth
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Autocommit-blocking-adds---AutoCommit-Speedup--tp23435224p23540569.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
consumption by this queue if commit takes
much longer to complete.
Thanks,
Siddharth
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Autocommit-blocking-adds---AutoCommit-Speedup--tp23435224p23540643.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
index corruption.
I'd be willing to work on submitting a patch given a better understanding
of
the issue.
Great, go for it!
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Autocommit-blocking-adds---AutoCommit-Speedup
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Jim Murphy jim.mur...@pobox.com wrote:
Any pointers to this newer more concurrent behavior in lucene?
At the API level we care about, IndexWriter.commit() instead of close()
Also, we shouldn't have to worry about other parts of the code closing
the writer on us
expect that to work?
Thanks for bootstrapping me on this.
Jim
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Autocommit-blocking-adds---AutoCommit-Speedup--tp23435224p23453693.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
);
} catch (ExecutionException e) {
SolrException.log(log,e);
}
}
}
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Autocommit-blocking-adds---AutoCommit-Speedup--tp23435224p23454419.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
) {
SolrException.log(log,e);
}
}
}
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Autocommit-blocking-adds---AutoCommit-Speedup--tp23435224p23455432.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
);
}
}
}
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Autocommit-blocking-adds---AutoCommit-Speedup--tp23435224p23457422.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Autocommit-blocking-adds---AutoCommit-Speedup--tp23435224p23435224.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Jim Murphy jim.mur...@pobox.com wrote:
Question 1: I see in DirectUpdateHandler2 that there is a read/Write lock
used between addDoc and commit.
My mental model of the process was this: clients can add/update documents
until the auto commit threshold was hit.
to work on submitting a patch given a better understanding of
the issue.
Jim
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Autocommit-blocking-adds---AutoCommit-Speedup--tp23435224p23438134.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 8:37 PM, Jim Murphy jim.mur...@pobox.com wrote:
Interesting. So is there a JIRA ticket open for this already? Any chance of
getting it into 1.4?
No ticket currently open, but IMO it could make it for 1.4.
Its seriously kicking out butts right now. We write
into our
16 matches
Mail list logo
