On Fri, 7 Mar 2008 17:59:48 -0800 (PST)
Chris Hostetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe Norberto ment he was handling it in his update client code --
before sending the docs to Solr.
Indeed, this what we do. We have a process that parses certain files, generates
documents following the
The best thing folks can do to help with getting patches like this
important DataImporterHandler committed to trunk is to try it out,
report back experiences, and offer suggestions for improvement.
Solr 1.3 will come in _good_ time, but not before its time. There
are many substantial
hi ,
The tool is undergoing substantial testing in our QA department .
Because it is an official internal project also, the bugs are filed in
our bug tool. We are fixing them as and when they are reported. It has
gone through some good iterations and it is going to power the backend
for a 2 of our
I used it to index my DB and I found no bugs .Ours is a very simple usecase.
There were rough edges though. The error logging and messages were not up to
the mark. It aborted the entire indexing when there was a missing
'required' field. It must just skip that document. Or give me an opotion to
Hi Norberto,
This sounds exactly what Im looking to do, do you have an example?
(Keep in mind Im using data-config.xml - DataImporter)
Im interested in merging different types of content in, ie:
NEWS12345
VIDEO12345
So Id like to end up w/ different keys per type if possible.
Thanks.
- Jon
That definitely sounds like the proper way to go + will try. Im not
too concerned w/ my keys coming back just that I can't seem to run the
DataImportHandler w/o one.
I was able to temporarily get around it by returning it in the entity
query. Ie:
entity query=select
Good to hear that people are using DatImportHandler
In a couple of days, we are giving another patch which is cleared by
our QA with
better error handling, messaging and a lot of new features.
A committer will have to decide on when it is good enough to be committed
--Noble
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008
I am also looking forward to get this checked into the trunk.
Will there be a patch with Solr1.2 support?
Cheers
Vijay
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 10:11 AM, Jon Baer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That definitely sounds like the proper way to go + will try. Im not
too concerned w/ my keys coming back
On Thu, 6 Mar 2008 11:33:38 -0500
Jon Baer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Im interested to know if composite keys are now possible or if there
is anything to copyField I can use to get composite keys working for
my doc ids?
FWIW, we just do this @ doc generation time - grab several fields,
