Re: Content privacy, search & index

2012-04-01 Thread Paul Libbrecht
HOULD) // no +, just impacts weight but is not required That's the way I implement query-expansion. I'm afraid I do not know a place where this is documented. paul > > Indeed, the friend list will obviously be cached. > > Thanks. > > Br, > Benjamin. > > --

RE: Content privacy, search & index

2012-04-01 Thread dbenjamin
could grow exponentially. The hypothesis is : 300K users, an average of 100 friends each and 200 documents (each). Br, Benjamin. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Content-privacy-search-index-tp3873462p3874982.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Content privacy, search & index

2012-04-01 Thread dbenjamin
old ? ;-) (even if I think that's just a matter of syntax...) Indeed, the friend list will obviously be cached. Thanks. Br, Benjamin. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Content-privacy-search-index-tp3873462p3874961.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

RE: Content privacy, search & index

2012-03-31 Thread spring
> - Is it the best way to do that ? > - It's obvious that i need to index the registered users in > Solr (because an > user can search for others), but is it clever to index friend > list for each > user as well ? (if we take a look at the search box on > Facebook, or other > any sexy social net

Re: Content privacy, search & index

2012-03-31 Thread Paul Libbrecht
eel > right ;-) > > The other way would be to index users and users friends and somehow letting > solr doing all the job. > > What do you think ? Is the second solution even possible ? > > > Thanks ! > Br, > > Benjamin. > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Content-privacy-search-index-tp3873462p3873462.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Content privacy, search & index

2012-03-31 Thread dbenjamin
k, or other any sexy social network, they propose auto-complete for current user friends, so maybe it makes sense...) Br, Benjamin. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Content-privacy-search-index-tp3873462p3874112.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Content privacy, search & index

2012-03-31 Thread Erick Erickson
all the job. > > What do you think ? Is the second solution even possible ? > > > Thanks ! > Br, > > Benjamin. > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Content-privacy-search-index-tp3873462p3873462.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Content privacy, search & index

2012-03-31 Thread dbenjamin
essage in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Content-privacy-search-index-tp3873462p3873462.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.