no problem, hope it helps, you're welcome.
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Radu Toev wrote:
> Really good point on the ids, I completely overlooked that matter.
> I will give it a try.
> Thanks again.
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Dmitry Kan wrote:
>
> > Each document in SOLR will corre
Really good point on the ids, I completely overlooked that matter.
I will give it a try.
Thanks again.
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Dmitry Kan wrote:
> Each document in SOLR will correspond to one db record and since both
> databases have the same schema, you can't index two records from two
Each document in SOLR will correspond to one db record and since both
databases have the same schema, you can't index two records from two
databases into the same SOLR document.
So after indexing, you should have 7k different documents, each of which
holds data from a db record.
Also one problem
I'm not sure I follow.
The idea is to have only one document. Do the multiple documents have the
same structure then(different datasources), and if so how are they actually
indexed?
Thanks.
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Dmitry Kan wrote:
> I think the problem here is that initially you tryin
I think the problem here is that initially you trying to create separate
documents for two different tables, while your config is aiming to create
only one document. Here there is one solution (not tried by me):
--
You can have multiple documents generated by the same data-config:
I've removed the connection params
The unique key is id.
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Dmitry Kan wrote:
> OK, maybe you can show the db-data-config.xml just in case?
> Also in schema.xml, does you correspond to the unique fi
OK, maybe you can show the db-data-config.xml just in case?
Also in schema.xml, does you correspond to the unique field in
the db?
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Radu Toev wrote:
> I tried running with just one datasource(the one that has 6k entries) and
> it indexes them ok.
> The same, if I
I tried running with just one datasource(the one that has 6k entries) and
it indexes them ok.
The same, if I do sepparately the 1k database. It indexes ok.
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Dmitry Kan wrote:
> It sounds a bit, as if SOLR stopped processing data once it queried all
> from the smal
It sounds a bit, as if SOLR stopped processing data once it queried all
from the smaller dataset. That's why you have 2000. If you just have a
handler pointed to the bigger data set (6k), do you manage to get all 6k db
entries into solr?
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Radu Toev wrote:
> 1. Not
1. Nothing in the logs
2. No.
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Dmitry Kan wrote:
> 1. Do you see any errors / exceptions in the logs?
> 2. Could you have duplicates?
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Radu Toev wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I created a data-config.xml file where I define a da
1. Do you see any errors / exceptions in the logs?
2. Could you have duplicates?
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Radu Toev wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I created a data-config.xml file where I define a datasource and an entity
> with 12 fields.
> In my use case I have 2 databases with the same schema,
Hello,
I created a data-config.xml file where I define a datasource and an entity
with 12 fields.
In my use case I have 2 databases with the same schema, so I want to
combine in one index the 2 databases.
I defined a second dataSource tag and duplicateed the entity with its
field(changed the name
12 matches
Mail list logo
