Should SubQuery be faster than FunctionQuery?
On Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 10:24 AM Vincenzo D'Amore
wrote:
> Hi, looking at this sample it seems you have just one document for '12345',
> one for '23456' and so on so forth. If this is true, why don't just try
> with a subquery
>
>
Hi, looking at this sample it seems you have just one document for '12345',
one for '23456' and so on so forth. If this is true, why don't just try
with a subquery
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/transforming-result-documents.html#TransformingResultDocuments-_subquery_
On Fri, Dec 11,
I have the requirement to create field - xyz to be returned based on the
matched result.
Here Is the code .
XYZ:concat(
if(exists(query({!v='field1:12345'})), '12345', ''),
if(exists(query({!v='field1:23456'})), '23456', ''),
if(exists(query({!v='field1:34567'})), '34567', ''),
