Hi All,
pushing the query to the top.
Does anyone have any idea about it?
On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 11:49 AM Ajay Sharma wrote:
> Hi Community,
>
> This is the first time, I am implementing a solr *highlighting *feature.
> I have read the concept via solr documentation
> Link-
Hi Community,
This is the first time, I am implementing a solr *highlighting *feature.
I have read the concept via solr documentation
Link- https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_2/highlighting.html
To enable highlighting I just have to add *=true=* *in our solr
query and got the snippet in the
Hi Edwin,
Thanks for your explanation, makes sense now.
Best regards
Martin
Internal - KMD A/S
-Original Message-
From: Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo
Sent: 30. juni 2019 01:57
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: highlighting not working as expected
Hi,
If you are using the type
urned.
>
> Best regards
>
> Martin
>
>
> Internal - KMD A/S
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jörn Franke
> Sent: 11. juni 2019 08:45
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: highlighting not working as expected
>
> Could it be a stop
örn Franke
Sent: 11. juni 2019 08:45
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: highlighting not working as expected
Could it be a stop word ? What is the exact type definition of those fields?
Could this word be omitted or with wrong encoding during loading of the
documents?
> Am 03.0
Hi Edwin,
Yes the field is defined just like the other fields:
BR
Martin
Internal - KMD A/S
-Original Message-
From: Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo
Sent: 4. juni 2019 10:32
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: highlighting not working as expected
Hi Martin,
What fieldType are you
-Original Message-
From: Jörn Franke
Sent: 11. juni 2019 08:45
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: highlighting not working as expected
Could it be a stop word ? What is the exact type definition of those fields?
Could this word be omitted or with wrong encoding during loading
Could it be a stop word ? What is the exact type definition of those fields?
Could this word be omitted or with wrong encoding during loading of the
documents?
> Am 03.06.2019 um 10:06 schrieb Martin Frank Hansen (MHQ) :
>
> Hi,
>
> I am having some difficulties making highlighting work. For
Hi David,
Thanks for your response and sorry my late reply.
Still the same result when using hl.method=unified.
Best regards
Martin
Internal - KMD A/S
-Original Message-
From: David Smiley
Sent: 10. juni 2019 16:48
To: solr-user
Subject: Re: highlighting not working as expected
Please try hl.method=unified and tell us if that helps.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 4:06 AM Martin Frank Hansen (MHQ) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am having some difficulties making highlighting work. For some reason
Hi Martin,
What fieldType are you using for the field “Sagstitel”? Is it the same as
other fields?
Regards,
Edwin
On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 at 16:06, Martin Frank Hansen (MHQ) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am having some difficulties making highlighting work. For some reason
> the highlighting feature only
Hi,
I am having some difficulties making highlighting work. For some reason the
highlighting feature only works on some fields but not on other fields even
though these fields are stored.
An example of a request looks like this:
Hi - Thanks for the reply, I'll give that a try.
-Original Message-
From: jimtronic [mailto:jimtro...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 3:56 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr 6.0 Highlighting Not Working
Perhaps you need to wrap your inner "" a
Perhaps you need to wrap your inner "" and "" tags in the CDATA
structure?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-6-0-Highlighting-Not-Working-tp4302787p4302835.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Can someone please help me troubleshoot my Solr 6.0 highlighting issue? I
have a production Solr 4.9.0 unit configured to highlight responses and it
has worked for a long time now without issues. I have recently been testing
Solr 6.0 and have been unable to get highlighting to work. I used my 4.9
Can someone please help me troubleshoot my Solr 6.0 highlighting issue? I
have a production Solr 4.9.0 unit configured to highlight responses and it
has worked for a long time now without issues. I have recently been testing
Solr 6.0 and have been unable to get highlighting to work. I used my 4.9
Were you ever able to resolve this issue? I am having same issue and highligh
is not working for me on solr 4.8?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Highlighting-not-working-tp4112659p4142513.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
10:28 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Highlighting not working
Were you ever able to resolve this issue? I am having same issue and
highligh is not working for me on solr 4.8?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Highlighting-not-working
think) because of the term*=true
settings.
Thanks again,
Fatima
-Original Message-
From: Ahmet Arslan [mailto:iori...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 5:02 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Highlighting not working
Hi Fatima,
To enable higlighting
Hello,
I'm trying to highlight content that is returned from a Solr query, but I can't
seem to get it working.
I would like to highlight the documentname and the pagetext or content
results, but when I run the search I don't get anything returned. I thought
that the content field is supposed
str name=f.content.hl.maxAlternateFieldLength750/str
-Original Message-
From: Fatima Issawi [mailto:issa...@qu.edu.qa]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 11:34 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Highlighting not working
Hello,
I'm trying to highlight content
: Highlighting not working
Hello,
I'm trying to highlight content that is returned from a Solr query, but I
can't
seem to get it working.
I would like to highlight the documentname and the pagetext or
content results, but when I run the search I don't get anything returned. I
thought
, 2014 5:02 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Highlighting not working
Hi Fatima,
To enable higlighting (both standard and fastvector) you need to make
stored=true.
Term vectors may speed up standard highlighter. Plus they are mandatory
for FastVectorHighligher.
https
copyField is a literal operation that happens at index time -- but it
really has no bearing what so ever on highlighting done at query time.
there is no memory of what source fields any values came from, so it
doesn't affect things in any way.
You haven't provided any details about your
-Moneyhl=truehl.fl=*, it will be highlighted. I attached
my solrconfig.xml here, could you please take a look? Thanks again!
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/file/n3983883/solrconfig.xml
solrconfig.xml
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Urgent-Highlighting
terms.
BTW, I presume that should be first name, not frist name.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: TJ Tong
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2012 11:15 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Urgent! Highlighting not working as expected
Hi Jack,
Thanks for your reply. I did
this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Urgent-Highlighting-not-working-as-expected-tp3983755p3983907.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
/Urgent-Highlighting-not-working-as-expected-tp3983755.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
: TJ Tong
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 4:44 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Urgent! Highlighting not working as expected
Dear all,
I queried Solr (3.5) with this: q=text:G-Moneyhl=truehl.fl=*, where text
is a text field and all the other fields were copied to it. I got three
records
if( pq.getTerms().length == 1 ){
flatQueries.add( new TermQuery( pq.getTerms()[0] ) );
}
}
}
// else discard queries
}
What is the best way to get highlighting working with Payload Term Queries?
Hi Nitin,
Thank you for reporting this problem! Your assumption
){
flatQueries.add( new TermQuery( pq.getTerms()[0] ) );
}
}
}
// else discard queries
}
What is the best way to get highlighting working with Payload Term Queries?
Thanks
Nitin
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr
Hi,
I'm having trouble getting highlighting to work for a large text
field. This field can be in several languages, so I'm sending it to
one of several fields configured appropriately (e.g. cv_text_en) and
then copying it to a common field for storage and display (cv_text).
The relevant fragment
I guess what I'm asking is - can Solr highlight non-indexed fields?
Tom
On 7 April 2011 11:33, Tom Mortimer t...@flax.co.uk wrote:
Hi,
I'm having trouble getting highlighting to work for a large text
field. This field can be in several languages, so I'm sending it to
one of several fields
I guess what I'm asking is - can Solr
highlight non-indexed fields?
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FieldOptionsByUseCase
Problem solved. *bangs head on desk*
T
On 7 April 2011 11:33, Tom Mortimer t...@flax.co.uk wrote:
Hi,
I'm having trouble getting highlighting to work for a large text
field. This field can be in several languages, so I'm sending it to
one of several fields configured appropriately (e.g.
I've downloaded
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/branch_3x
and ran ant there. I've followed the tutorial but
highlighting on analyzer debug screen isn't working.
This link found in the tutorial doesn't show any highlight.
I have a prefix_token field defined as underneath in my schema.xml
fieldType name=prefix_token class=solr.TextField
positionIncrementGap=1
analyzer type=index
tokenizer class=solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory/
filter class=solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory /
filter
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Avlesh Singh avl...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a prefix_token field defined as underneath in my schema.xml
fieldType name=prefix_token class=solr.TextField
positionIncrementGap=1
analyzer type=index
tokenizer class=solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory/
Hmmm .. But ngrams with KeywordTokenizerFactory instead of the
WhitespaceTokenizerFactory work just as fine. Related issues?
Cheers
Avlesh
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
shalinman...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Avlesh Singh avl...@gmail.com
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Avlesh Singh avl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmmm .. But ngrams with KeywordTokenizerFactory instead of the
WhitespaceTokenizerFactory work just as fine. Related issues?
I'm sorry I don't understand the question. Do you mean to say that
highlighting works with one
I'm sorry I don't understand the question. Do you mean to say that
highlighting works with one but not with another?
Yes.
Cheers
Avlesh
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
shalinman...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Avlesh Singh avl...@gmail.com
Why do you have:
query.set(hl.maxAnalyzedChars, -1);
Have you tried using the default? Unless -1 is an undoc'd feature, this
means you wouldnt get anything back! This should normally be a fairly
hefty value and defaults to 51200, according to the wiki.
And why:
query.set(hl.fragsize, 1);
I've tried with default values and didn't work either.
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote:
Why do you have:
query.set(hl.maxAnalyzedChars, -1);
Have you tried using the default? Unless -1 is an undoc'd feature, this
means you wouldnt get anything back!
Couple of things I've forgot to mention:
Solr Version: 1.3
Enviroment: Websphere
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 2:34 PM, Bruno brun...@gmail.com wrote:
I've tried with default values and didn't work either.
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.comwrote:
Why do you have:
Nothing off the top of my head ...
I can play around with some of the solrj unit tests a bit later and
perhaps see if I can dig anything up.
Note:
if you expect wildcard/prefix/etc queries to highlight, they will not
with Solr 1.3.
query.set(hl.highlightMultiTerm, *true*);
The above only
Note that highlighting is NOT part of the document list returned.
It's in an additional NamedList section of the response (with
name=highlighting)
Erik
On Jun 18, 2009, at 1:22 PM, Bruno wrote:
Hi guys.
I new at using highlighting, so probably I'm making some stupid
mistake,
Here is the query, search for the term ipod on the log field
I've checked the NamedList you told me about, but it contains only one
highlighted doc, when there I have more docs that sould be highlighted.
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Erik Hatcher e...@ehatchersolutions.comwrote:
Note that highlighting is NOT part of the document list returned. It's
Just figured out what happened... It's necessary for the schema to have a
uniqueKey set, otherwise, highlighting will have one or less entries, as the
map's key is the doc uniqueKey, so on debuggin I figured out that the
QueryResponse tries to put all highlighted results in a map with null key...
And unfortunately, that isn't the best approach for highlighting to
take - a uniqueKey shouldn't be required for highlighting. I've yet
to see a real-world deployment of Solr that did not have a uniqueKey
field, but there's no reason Solr should make that assumption.
Erik
On Jun
(XMLResponseParser.java:291)
at
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.XMLResponseParser.processResponse(XMLResponseParser.java:127)
http://www.nabble.com/file/p21254049/solrconfig.xml solrconfig.xml
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Highlighting-not-working-tp21254049p21254049
51 matches
Mail list logo
