Hi Erick,
thank you very much for your help. What's confusing me is that another
of my fields does not have any analyzers defined at all, and it's
working fine without problems. So, it must be possible to define field
type without specifying any analyzers. I don't understand why it
shouldn't be
What's confusing me is that another
of my fields does not have any analyzers defined at all, and it's
working fine without problems.
Field or fieldType?
So, it must be possible to define field
type without specifying any analyzers.
Truth to tell, I don't know off the top of my head
what
Hi Erick,
On 03/12/10 17:09, Erick Erickson wrote:
What's confusing me is that another
of my fields does not have any analyzers defined at all, and it's
working fine without problems.
Field or fieldType?
...one of my fields with a fieldtype that does not have any analyzer
defined at all,
