Just to be clear, we are talking about two different Lucid Imagination products.
The Certified Distribution is a repackaging of the public Solr
releases with various add-on goodies that Lucid and others have
written over the years. This is the "drop-in replacement" for the
Apache release of Solr.
On Apr 8, 2011, at 17:32 , Mark wrote:
> How come this new version is bundled with rails and why is there no .war
> output format?
Rails, via JRuby, is used in LucidWorks Enterprise for both the admin and
search interfaces. (and also powers the Alerts REST API).
> I wanted a simple drop in re
How come this new version is bundled with rails and why is there no .war
output format?
I wanted a simple drop in replacement for my current war :(
On 4/8/11 1:27 PM, Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
On 4/8/11 9:55 PM, Andy wrote:
--- On Fri, 4/8/11, Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
:) If you don't need t
On 4/8/11 9:55 PM, Andy wrote:
--- On Fri, 4/8/11, Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
:) If you don't need the new functionality in 4.x, you don't
need the performance improvements,
What performance improvements does 4.x have over 3.1?
Ah... well, many - take a look at the CHANGES.txt.
reindexi
--- On Fri, 4/8/11, Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
> :) If you don't need the new functionality in 4.x, you don't
> need the performance improvements,
What performance improvements does 4.x have over 3.1?
> reindexing cycles are long (indexes tend to stay around)
> then 3.1 is a safer bet. If you n
On 4/8/11 4:58 PM, Mark wrote:
Doesn't look like you allow new members to post questions in that forum.
There's a "Create new account" link there, you simply need to register
and log in.
I have just one last question ;)
We are deciding whether to upgrade our 1.4 production environment to
Unless you need the goodies in 4.x, I'd go with 3.1, just on the
principle that 4.x is more fluid than 3.1, and I'd go with more
static code. 4.x gets whatever patches the committers decide are good
whereas 3.1 (or 3.2 if that comes out) will have a smaller set of
changes.
Both are well tested, it
Doesn't look like you allow new members to post questions in that forum.
I have just one last question ;)
We are deciding whether to upgrade our 1.4 production environment to 4.x
or 3.1. What were you decisions when deciding to release 4.x over 3.1?
Thanks again
On 4/8/11 1:13 AM, Andrzej Bi
On 4/7/11 10:16 PM, Mark wrote:
Andrezej,
Thanks for the info. I have a question regarding stability though. How
are you able to guarantee the stability of this release when 4.0 is
still a work in progress? I believe the last version Lucid released was
1.4 so why did you choose to release a 4.x
?
Is the source code including with your distribution so that we may be
able to do some further patching upon it?
Thanks again and hopefully I'll be joining you at that conference.
On 4/7/11 12:54 PM, Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
On 4/7/11 9:43 PM, Mark wrote:
I noticed that Lucid Works distrib
On 4/7/11 9:43 PM, Mark wrote:
I noticed that Lucid Works distribution now says is upt to date with 4.X
versions. Does this mean 1.4 or 4.0/trunk?
If its truly 4.0 does that mean it includes the collapse component?
Yes it does.
Also, is the click scoring tools proprietary or was this just a
I noticed that Lucid Works distribution now says is upt to date with 4.X
versions. Does this mean 1.4 or 4.0/trunk?
If its truly 4.0 does that mean it includes the collapse component?
Also, is the click scoring tools proprietary or was this just a
contrib/patch that was applied?
Thanks
12 matches
Mail list logo
