Thanks, everyone!
--
Audrey Lorberfeld
Data Scientist, w3 Search
Digital Workplace Engineering
CIO, Finance and Operations
IBM
audrey.lorberf...@ibm.com
On 8/29/19, 11:28 AM, "Atita Arora" wrote:
I would agree with the suggestion, I remember something similar presented
by someone at
I would agree with the suggestion, I remember something similar presented
by someone at Berlin Buzzwords 19.
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019, 5:03 PM Jörn Franke wrote:
> It could be sensible to have one spellchecker / language (as different
> endpoint or as a queryparameter at runtime). Alternatively, dep
It could be sensible to have one spellchecker / language (as different endpoint
or as a queryparameter at runtime). Alternatively, depending on your use case
you could get away with a generic fieldtype that does not do anything language
specific, but I doubt.
> Am 29.08.2019 um 16:20 schrieb Au
Hi All,
We are starting up an internal search engine that has to work for many
different languages. We are starting with a POC of Spanish and English
documents, and we are using the DirectSolrSpellChecker.
From reading others' threads online, I know that we have to have multiple
spellcheckers
