://www.simpy.com/ - Tag - Search - Share
- Original Message
From: James liu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2007 3:45:06 AM
Subject: Re: Multiple doc types in schema
I see SOLR-215 from this mail.
Does it now really support multi index
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Simpy -- http://www.simpy.com/ - Tag - Search - Share
- Original Message
From: James liu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2007 3:45:06 AM
Subject: Re: Multiple doc types in schema
I see SOLR-215 from
Otis,
Thanks for the link and the work !
Maybe around september, I will need this patch, if it's not already
commit to the Solr sources.
I will also need multiple indexes searches, but understand that there is
no simple, fast and genereric solution in solr context. Maybe I should
lose solr
On 6/21/07, Frédéric Glorieux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will also need multiple indexes searches,
Do you mean:
1) Multiple unrelated indexes with different schemas, that you will
search separately... but you just want them in the same JVM for some
reason.
2) Multiple indexes with different
Hi Sonic,
I will also need multiple indexes searches,
Do you mean:
2) Multiple indexes with different schemas, search will search across
all or some subset and combine the results (federated search)
Exactly that. I'm comming from a quite old lucene based project, called SDX
On 6/21/07, Frédéric Glorieux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will also need multiple indexes searches,
Do you mean:
2) Multiple indexes with different schemas, search will search across
all or some subset and combine the results (federated search)
Exactly that. I'm comming from a quite old
Thanks Yonik to share your reflexion,
This doesn't sound like true federated search,
I'm affraid to not understand federated search, you seems to have a
precise idea behind the head.
since you have a number
of fields that are the same in each index that you search across, and
you treat
After further reading, especially
http://people.apache.org/~hossman/apachecon2006us/faceted-searching-with-solr.pdf
(Thanks Hoss)
Depending on update patterns and index sizes, you can probably get
better efficiency with multiple indexes, but not really more
functionality (in your case),
PROTECTED]
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; Jack L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 6, 2007 6:58:10 AM
Subject: Re: Multiple doc types in schema
: This is based on my understanding that solr/lucene does not
: have the concept of document type. It only sees fields.
:
: Is my understanding
://www.simpy.com/ - Tag - Search - Share
- Original Message
From: Chris Hostetter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; Jack L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 6, 2007 6:58:10 AM
Subject: Re: Multiple doc types in schema
: This is based on my understanding that solr
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 6, 2007 6:58:10 AM
Subject: Re: Multiple doc types in schema
: This is based on my understanding that solr/lucene does not
: have the concept of document type. It only sees fields.
:
: Is my understanding correct?
it is.
: It seems a bit unclean to mix fields
Ah i was missunderstanding your goal of doctypes ... the use case i
was thinking is that you have book documents and movie documents
and you frequently only query on one type of the other but sometime you do
a generic query on all of them using the fields they have in common.
this is
As far as I understand, I can put multiple doc types in the same
index, for example, web pages, images, products, etc. In order
to do so, I think I need to do the following:
- have a doctype field (not necessary but nice to have)
- add all possible fields of all doc types in schema
- when
13 matches
Mail list logo
