On 5/5/2016 11:42 PM, Bastien Latard - MDPI AG wrote:
> So if I run the two following requests, it will only store once 7.5Mo,
> right?
> - select?q=*:*=bPublic:true=10
> - select?q=field:my_search=bPublic:true=10
That is correct.
Thanks,
Shawn
Thank you Shawn!
So if I run the two following requests, it will only store once 7.5Mo,
right?
- select?q=*:*=bPublic:true=10
- select?q=field:my_search=bPublic:true=10
kr,
Bast
On 04/05/2016 16:22, Shawn Heisey wrote:
On 5/3/2016 11:58 PM, Bastien Latard - MDPI AG wrote:
Thank you for
n "now you know about
it."
:
: Tomás
:
: On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 11:20 PM, Bastien Latard - MDPI AG <
: lat...@mdpi.com.invalid> wrote:
:
: > Hi Guys,
: >
: > I got several times the OOM script executed since I upgraded to Solr6.0:
: >
: > $ cat solr_oom_killer
On 5/3/2016 11:58 PM, Bastien Latard - MDPI AG wrote:
> Thank you for your email.
> You said "have big caches or request big pages (e.g. 100k docs)"...
> Does a fq cache all the potential results, or only the ones the query
> returns?
> e.g.: select?q=*:*=bPublic:true=10
>
> => with this query, if
JVM settings). A bigger heap usually means more work
to the GC and less memory available for the OS cache.
Tomás
On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 11:20 PM, Bastien Latard - MDPI AG <
lat...@mdpi.com.invalid> wrote:
Hi Guys,
I got several times the OOM script executed since I upgraded to Solr6.0:
memory available for the OS cache.
>>
>> Tomás
>>
>> On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 11:20 PM, Bastien Latard - MDPI AG <
>> lat...@mdpi.com.invalid> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Guys,
>>>
>>> I got several times the OOM script executed since I upgraded t
more work
to the GC and less memory available for the OS cache.
Tomás
On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 11:20 PM, Bastien Latard - MDPI AG <
lat...@mdpi.com.invalid> wrote:
Hi Guys,
I got several times the OOM script executed since I upgraded to Solr6.0:
$ cat solr_oom_killer-8983-2016-04-29_15_16_51
to the GC and less memory available for the OS cache.
Tomás
On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 11:20 PM, Bastien Latard - MDPI AG <
lat...@mdpi.com.invalid> wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> I got several times the OOM script executed since I upgraded to Solr6.0:
>
> $ cat solr_oom_killer-8983-20
Hi Guys,
I got several times the OOM script executed since I upgraded to Solr6.0:
$ cat solr_oom_killer-8983-2016-04-29_15_16_51.log
Running OOM killer script for process 26044 for Solr on port 8983
Does it mean that I need to increase my JAVA Heap?
Or should I do anything else?
Here are some