).
Nicolas
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Yonik Seeley
Envoyé : dimanche 2 mars 2008 03:45
À : solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Objet : Re: Proposition of a new feature: Dynamic Field Types
On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 9:38 PM, Otis Gospodnetic
[EMAIL
-
De : Grant Ingersoll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : vendredi 29 février 2008 14:06
À : solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Objet : Re: Proposition of a new feature: Dynamic Field Types
Why can't you choose the proper field in your application and keep
separate fields per language? Putting them all
] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008 11:52:07 AM
Subject: RE: Proposition of a new feature: Dynamic Field Types
Thanks for your response Grant.
You are right, depending of the language we could index the text in a
specific field. At request
On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 9:38 PM, Otis Gospodnetic
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't quite follow everything here (examples?), but I believe IDF of a term
is not a per-field value, but index-wide.
I think Nicolas meant that idfs are field specific, and that is the
case (index-wide, per field).
Dynamic field types are field types that act as proxies to other field
types. The choice of the field type to use is done on a per document basis
and is dependent of the values of the document's fields.
The use case that led us to this feature is the indexation of documents in
different
Why can't you choose the proper field in your application and keep
separate fields per language? Putting them all in the same field,
regardless of language, is not a good idea in my opinion because it is
more than likely going to skew your statistics and lower your relevance.
That being
Ingersoll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : vendredi 29 février 2008 14:06
À : solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Objet : Re: Proposition of a new feature: Dynamic Field Types
Why can't you choose the proper field in your application and keep
separate fields per language? Putting them all in the same
