Hi Markus,
SPDY does provide lower latency in the case when I have multiple requests to
the same server/domain. It compresses the header and reduces the number of
connections. But since it uses tls I am not sure if it will be faster than http
1.1. That is why I wanted to test SPDY with solr
Hi Harsh,
Does SPDY provide lower latency than HTTP/1.1 with KeepAlive or is it
encryption that you're after?
Markus
-Original message-
From:harspras prasadta...@outlook.com
Sent:Tue 13-05-2014 05:38
Subject:Re: Solr + SPDY
To:solr-user@lucene.apache.org;
Hi Vinay,
I have been
Hi Vinay,
I have been trying to setup a similar environment with SPDY being enabled
for Solr inter shard communication. Did you happen to have been able to do
it? I somehow cannot use SolrCloud with SPDY enabled in jetty.
Regards,
Harsh Prasad
--
View this message in context:
Hi Otis,
While the main goal of SPDY is to reduce page load times - i think we could
benefit from it in Solr context as well.
The transport layer is still TCP - but SPDY allows multiplexing of
requests. It also uses compression and reduces the overhead of http
headers.
An excerpt from
I'm rusty on SPDY. Can you summarize the benefits in Solr context? Thanks.
Otis
Solr ElasticSearch Support
http://sematext.com/
On Oct 25, 2013 10:46 AM, Vinay Pothnis poth...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Couple of questions related to using SPDY with solr.
1. Does anybody have experience
