Re: Solr 3.6 optimize and field cache question

2013-07-10 Thread Marc Sturlese
Not a solution for the short term but sounds like a good use case to migrate to Solr 4.X and use DocValues instead of FieldCache for faceting. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-3-6-optimize-and-field-cache-question-tp4076398p4076822.html Sent from the

RE: Solr 3.6 optimize and field cache question

2013-07-08 Thread Michael Ryan
I'm 99% sure that the deleted docs will indeed use up space in the field cache, at least until the segments that those documents are in are merged - that is what an optimize will do. Of course, these segments will automatically be merged eventually, but it might take days for this to happen,

Re: Solr 3.6 optimize and field cache question

2013-07-08 Thread Otis Gospodnetic
Hi, 70 GB heap and still OOMing? H sure, 14 fields for faceting, but still - 70 GB heap! Don't have source handy, but I quickly looked at FC src here - http://search-lucene.com/c/Lucene:core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/FieldCache.java - I see mentions of delete there, so I would