@rulinma:
I've analyzed all your messages and noticed you keep sending useless "mark"
and "good". Are you trying to spam the mailing list? Could you please stop
doing this?
E-mail clients these days have bookmarking / staring in case you want to
save the "good" post for later reading or "mark" it
mark.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-High-GC-issue-tp4138570p4139785.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
BTW, memory usage is _much_ better in Solr 4.x, if it's at all an option
you might consider upgrading. See:
http://searchhub.org/2012/04/06/memory-comparisons-between-solr-3x-and-trunk/
Best,
Erick
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Toke Eskildsen
wrote:
> bihan.chandu [bihan.cha...@gmail.com]
bihan.chandu [bihan.cha...@gmail.com] wrote:
> I am Currently using solr 3.6.1 and my system handle lot of request .Now we
> are facing High GC issue in system.
Maybe it would help to get an idea of what is causing all the allocations?
- How many documents in your index?
- How many queries/sec?
-
Agreed, that is a LOT of options.
First, check the defaults and remove any flags that are setting something to
the default. You can see all the flags and the default values with this command:
java -XX:+PrintFlagsFinal -version
For example, the default for ParallelGCThreads is 8, so you do not
Hi All
Thanks for the Suggestion. I will implement this changes and let us know the
update
Regards
Bihan
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-High-GC-issue-tp4138570p4138694.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
From: Otis Gospodnetic
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 07:20
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr High GC issue
Hi Bihan,
That's a lot of parameters and without trying one can't really give you
very specific and good advice. If I had to suggest something q
Hi Bihan,
That's a lot of parameters and without trying one can't really give you
very specific and good advice. If I had to suggest something quickly I'd
say:
* go back to the basics - remove most of those params and stick with the
basic ones. Look at GC and tune slowly by changing/adding para
